|
||||||||
ITT: It's a hard life as a judge! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 22,219
|
Yea, the REALLY believe we are that stupid.........now thats even more worrying...
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,876
|
Quote:
So on one thread the judges have their own favourites and consistently over mark them. On another they are inconsistent. Make your minds up folks.
There's nowt like a conspiracy is there? BTW the idea that someone of John's calibre could be bullied by sdome judges comments is laughable. Time to move on me thinks. ![]() Quote:
This show has become a farce.....
In the John Barrowman backstage footage Len said each 'week a good dancer will go'. Then in the phone-in today he said deciding who should go last Saturday, was a 'no brainer'. Which indicates the choice last saturday was not difficult. Clearly the producers are rattled by last weeks events, hence the video CV of the judges dancing careers? Quote:
ITT was hilarious. Talk about lack of subtlety. The rehabilitation of the judges. For God's sake, I wish they didn't insult my intelligence. As if, that piece is going to undo all the crap they have come out with, oh poor them, how they have been misunderstood.
Anyway I'm so glad that some people are soooooorilliant that they know exactly what a judge does. If those people would like to let me know what you do then I will happily pull your own occupations apart (ie Coal Miner? All you do is go down a hole and pull out some rocks. Not exactly difficult is it? So you cry about geting a bit dirty etc etc) Take it nobody here has been a central part of a live television series? Thought not. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,826
|
Quizmike, it wasn't what the judges said on ITT last night that was so hilarious, it was the fact that it was so obvious the producers were trying to do damage limitation. At any other time it would have been quite interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,876
|
Quote:
Quizmike, it wasn't what the judges said on ITT last night that was so hilarious, it was the fact that it was so obvious the producers were trying to do damage limitation. At any other time it would have been quite interesting.
![]() I was pointing out to the poster that they were wrong to say that Len said that tonight. Sometimes the truth goes astray in the middle of a hoohah. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 43
|
I guess a hastily put-together puff-piece for the poor hard-done-by judges was their idea of a response
to JS's delicious verbal put-down on Saturday, but as such it was pretty feeble and just ended up making them look a bit desperate. |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 999
|
Quote:
This show has become a farce.....
In the John Barrowman backstage footage Len said each 'week a good dancer will go'. Then in the phone-in today he said deciding who should go last Saturday, was a 'no brainer'. Which indicates the choice last saturday was not difficult. Clearly the producers are rattled by last weeks events, hence the video CV of the judges dancing careers? to make over the dance off. It's all bullshine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Green Room
Posts: 1,165
|
Quote:
I thought it was rather hilarious
Subtle as a sledge hammer I'd be happy earning £90K doing a job as difficult as theirs
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,073
|
Quote:
But on the show the judges saying how difficult a decision to make over the dance off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 68,698
|
Quote:
I guess a hastily put-together puff-piece
Quote:
for the poor hard-done-by judges was their idea of a response to JS's delicious verbal put-down on Saturday, but as such it was pretty feeble and just ended up So there are instances where verbal put-downs are acceptable? making them look a bit desperate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,943
|
Quote:
More or less have said just the same on the ITT thread........Len does not have to go over to the US every week,he CHOOSES to,no excuse
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
I guess a hastily put-together puff-piece for the poor hard-done-by judges was their idea of a response
to JS's delicious verbal put-down on Saturday, but as such it was pretty feeble and just ended up making them look a bit desperate. I believe they were ripping it out of those people who, when presented with pantomime characters, can't understand that when you 'boo' and 'hiss' at them it's supposed to be a bit of a laugh. So they subvert the illusion and emphasise the gullibility and prick the pompousness in a deliberately heavy-handed, patronising way by presenting an alternative, opposing and excessively sympathetic 'reality'. Maybe it was subtler than I thought at the time. |
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,321
|
Quote:
More or less have said just the same on the ITT thread........Len does not have to go over to the US every week,he CHOOSES to,no excuse
![]() The beeb should ask us the public if we want FOUR new judges ? They'd get more voting for that than they did for John !! ![]() As for a hard life....well thinking up those "great" put-downs really does take some doing |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 669
|
Personally, I really don’t the Judges job is all that difficult and they are very well paid. I know they get a bit of flak but I feel they have courted the media’s attention and brought this upon themselves. If this piece on ITT was trying to paint them in a more positive light, then for me it failed…..badly!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 8,856
|
If I got paid that much for the job they do then I certainly wouldn't complain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 948
|
I really hope that this slot means that the producers of this show realise that they were taking it in the wrong direction. The undertones were getting too much like X-Factor with the pathetic arguments between judges & downright nasty personal comments from the judges. OK - the judges said the stuff but the producers were clearly happy about it. Also the VT's this year showing the competitive nature of 'some' of the contestants hasn't helped the show. All the stuff about Tom/Austin didn't play well - it is only an entertainment show for god sake.
It would be great if this show can get back to its roots. Light hearted fun based around dance. Judges criticise the dancing but nothing else. Contestants having fun learning to dance. Let X-Factor do all the competitive stuff / nasty fall-outs between judges. I see a contestant in USA has committed suicide after being ridiculed by the judges on American Idol. I do fear something similar could happen here & then the press will turn big time. |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 4,492
|
It was very funny....why o why do they HAVE to talk by phone to Len...poor old Len as they tried to make us believe.
Poor well paid judges they love the power. Mmmmm do we all love the judges now? This viewer says NO....especially Len.....who has really got away with the knicker comment. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 100
|
Note to Aunty:
Idea for new reality gameshow - "So you wanna be a Strictly Judge?!" Get a bunch of wannabees (enough kicking around here to be going on with probably) and put them through a bunch of humiliating rounds each followed by a public vote. Last one standing (and still sane) gets to be a strictly judge. |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,943
|
I do have to say that Steve Guttenberg had a good response to the questions asked him about his experience on Dancing with the Stars. Asked if it was hard - he said "no coal mining is a hard job - this was fun" and if the judges comments upset him he seemed to understand that it was part fair critism part in the spirit of coming out with soundbites for entertainment value. Being a judge is not hard work on Strictly but then the celebs shouldn't be so precious about critism either - in fairness JS never was it was it was his fans who got annoyed and used words like bullying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 4,492
|
Quote:
I do have to say that Steve Guttenberg had a good response to the questions asked him about his experience on Dancing with the Stars. Asked if it was hard - he said "no coal mining is a hard job - this was fun" and if the judges comments upset him he seemed to understand that it was part fair critism part in the spirit of coming out with soundbites for entertainment value. Being a judge is not hard work on Strictly but then the celebs shouldn't be so precious about critism either - in fairness JS never was it was it was his fans who got annoyed and used words like bullying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 55
|
Quote:
Quizmike.How much intelligence do you have to actually insult? Can you please tell me what crap you think they have come out with?I look forward to your answer.
Quote:
Quizmike Take it nobody here has been a central part of a live television series? Thought not.
Wow there is really no call for that. Apologies for keeping you waiting for my answer. Anyway, how ironic would it be if I was a Coal Miner, I'm not however even more ironic than that I do work in post production so I know how programmes are put together , but what I do isn't relevant. The point I was making, and I'm sorry if I wasn't clear was that the piece on ITT about what a difficult job the judges have was so obviously an attempt to rehabilitate them in some of the public's minds after the JS debacle. That was what I meant by, don't insult my intelligence. As for the crap they have come out with. I accept here I was not clear, I meant concerning JS. For example Arlene on ITT last Monday week, saying that JS just read a paper all day, in my opinion it wasn't fair. Quote:
Quizmike Anyway I'm so glad that some people are soooooorilliant that they know exactly what a judge does.
Eh on SCD,they spend a day in the studio, they sit in front of the performers , comment on some of the dances and then give them marks. It isn't more complicated that that. If they do anymore than that I'd like to knowI agree Hayfever. Why I loved SCD was because of the fun and entertainment, not the nasty comments, judges fighting and insulting each other, which I know is all pantomime, but I don't like it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 68,698
|
Quote:
It would be great if this show can get back to its roots. Light hearted fun based around dance. Judges criticise the dancing but nothing else. Contestants having fun learning to dance.
Let X-Factor do all the competitive stuff / nasty fall-outs between judges. |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 22,219
|
Quote:
So would I - money for old rope - they must be laughing all the way to the bank and the bank must be really grateful in this economic climate.
![]() They think we are too stupid to have sussed it out. ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 68,698
|
Quote:
I do have to say that Steve Guttenberg had a good response to the questions asked him about his experience on Dancing with the Stars. Asked if it was hard - he said "no coal mining is a hard job - this was fun" and if the judges comments upset him he seemed to understand that it was part fair critism part in the spirit of coming out with soundbites for entertainment value.
Quote:
Being a judge is not hard work on Strictly
Although, unless we have tried it under similar circumstances, it would be difficult to say that - it looks easy, but ..... (in the same way that sitting at a newsdesk reading an autocue looks easy, or driving a train looks easy )Quote:
but then the celebs shouldn't be so precious about critism either - in fairness JS never was it was it was his fans who got annoyed and used words like bullying.
Yes, and the second part of that point is something that we should all bear in mind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 22,219
|
in total, it works out to be about 50 hours work in 13 weeks.....90 grand
Sign me up.............lol |
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,073
|
3 threads are simultaneously bubbling away:
in stereo? No. In quadrophone? No. Is there such a thing as trilophone? For those exhausted by keeping up, here is a precis in 3 sentences: ITT: it's a hard life as a judge. ![]() Are the judges worth 90 grand? :yawn: BBC may axe Arlene and Craig.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:49.






