I think Brendan expressed a quite reasonable opinion on the subject. The 'reporter' stuck in the usual 'ranted' etc. to try to spice it up and make it look worse.
The difference with James, apart from him being more vehement and less eloquent, was that he also accused John of wanting to make the show about John. That was an unwise thing to say.
If you accept the article Brendan did say that John had other things to do, which is a subtle way of hinting at why he thinks he left. Much more diplomatic.
The difference with James, apart from him being more vehement and less eloquent, was that he also accused John of wanting to make the show about John. That was an unwise thing to say.
If you accept the article Brendan did say that John had other things to do, which is a subtle way of hinting at why he thinks he left. Much more diplomatic.




