DS Forums

 
 

Tommy's Accident ... True Or False ?


Closed Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 21-10-2003, 21:43
weymel
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dorset,UK
Posts: 98
But thats like me asking you "prove you are you" and if you think that's easy, then do it!
weymel is offline  
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 21-10-2003, 21:47
Goodfella
 
Posts: n/a

they dont need to prove anything if they dont want to. Especially if they are genuine.

I personally wouldnt want to join that NG if the new posters last night were anything to go by.

I wasnt meaning you. I didnt notice you in the threads with the posts removed so dont know if you were involved.

I wasnt that botheres by your sceptical post but I can understand anyone with inside info getting fed up at being pressurised or whatever.

Who wants to hang around for abuse or for constant scepticism ? if they are who they are then they dont need to prove anything. Its up to us to believe them or not.

And if they feel welcome they will keep posting.
 
Old 21-10-2003, 21:49
weymel
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dorset,UK
Posts: 98
I have asked admin if they can help with the proof bit, and now I suppose you want to see the reciept from them!
weymel is offline  
Old 21-10-2003, 21:53
KriZ
Banned User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: SE England
Posts: 4,200
Originally posted by weymel
It's not in the press because Tommy doesn't want it in the press, it's that simple, if you want something in the press you have to tell them, Tommy has chosen not to, it;s that simple.

As for proof of who we are, I think it is a shame that the bandits from the NG have made you question us but there you go, thats life, I mean Yidaho cares about nothing, couldn't give a fig about anything, and yet has alot to say for somebody whos not interested!

Ok Kriz, do you have somewhere where I can upload a picture of Tommy with any words of your choice on a piece of paper, then perhaps we can do that, and basically leave the forum, because this just ain't worth it!
Hi!
I can put up a picture if you would like - no problem!
And if you want to put some words with the picture, also no problem!!!

If you send me an email with what you want to say and attach the pic to it, I'll upload it to my website and then let you know the URL - then you can post that URL wherever you wish!

Send anything you want to-

CDM@dsl.pipex.com

But there is no reason to leave here!

KriZ is offline  
Old 21-10-2003, 21:53
yidaho
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 1,449
[quote]Originally posted by weymel
Yidaho, I passed a comment that you have admitted several times, and that is, you don't care about Teen BB, you don't care about anything else, and I made what I thought to be a reasonable observation, and that is basically why are you bothering then?

Can you point these posts out to me?

where is the aggression in that? You have posted a name a few times that I have never heard of, and it's reasonable in my opinion to ask what your problem is?

Are you now denying that you are 'Reformat'? That you posted (in fact, trolled) in free.uk.tv.bigbrother claiming to be Tommy's dad, and more or less invited us over here to DS:BB as, and I quote "I tell you what this NG is already been ridiculed on a big brother forum as a waste of space and full of idiots who have no interest in BB, so I will go back there and enjoy ripping you apart"? You really expect us to ignore that? You truly have me perplexed. Neither I, nor other posters of free.uk.tv.bigbrother deserved the unprovoked barrage of foul-mouthed abuse that you dished out. So, I have to ask myself, "Why would Tommy's dad do that?" Is that sounreasonable?
yidaho is offline  
Old 21-10-2003, 21:54
Goodfella
 
Posts: n/a
you dont need to prove anything Weymel of course.

Im sure admin will keep your privacy etc. They seem to be a good lot.

Only do whatever you feel comfy with. Not many people would put up with being made unwelcome.
 
Old 21-10-2003, 21:55
yidaho
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 1,449
Originally posted by weymel
But thats like me asking you "prove you are you" and if you think that's easy, then do it!
I'm not claiming to be anyone!
yidaho is offline  
Old 21-10-2003, 22:05
weymel
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dorset,UK
Posts: 98
KriZ you have mail
weymel is offline  
Old 21-10-2003, 22:07
yidaho
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 1,449
Originally posted by Goodfella
you dont need to prove anything Weymel of course.

Im sure admin will keep your privacy etc. They seem to be a good lot.

Only do whatever you feel comfy with. Not many people would put up with being made unwelcome.
*Sigh* No-one is making Weymel [feel] unwelcome.

Personally, I am questioning whether:

(a) Weymel is Tommy's father
(b) how true the 'fixing' allegations are

What is so wrong in that?
yidaho is offline  
Old 21-10-2003, 22:07
Goodfella
 
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by yidaho
I'm not claiming to be anyone!
He is whoever he is.

If he isnt who we think he is then its all been made up. If he is who he is then he can say whatever he wants to. He doesnt need to prove himself to us. If we dont believe him then thats our problem.
 
Old 21-10-2003, 22:11
weymel
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dorset,UK
Posts: 98
Originally posted by yidaho
I'm not claiming to be anyone!
Clever, It's a shame you can't answer a straightforward question

Never heard of a 'reformat' lets turn the tables, YOU prove that is me!!!!!!!

As Tommys dad I have no reason to go to a NG that I KNOW does not deal with BB, you are right it makes no sense, does it?
weymel is offline  
Old 21-10-2003, 22:12
Goodfella
 
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by yidaho
*Sigh* No-one is making Weymel [feel] unwelcome.

Personally, I am questioning whether:

(a) Weymel is Tommy's father
(b) how true the 'fixing' allegations are

What is so wrong in that?
well heres your original post.

<< Quite. I'm astounded that so many people on this forum appear to have been sucked in by the mad ramblings of a couple people claiming to be members of the contestants' families. I suggest they ought to take their 'fix' stories to the national papers, if there be any truth in the allegations, which I doubt. In fact, the only thread, as far as I can tell, that dared to question the credibility of these bizarre claims, has been removed. I'm also surprised that the DS moderators allow these defamatory posts to continue with such incessancy. Really. >>

not very welcoming is it ?
 
Old 21-10-2003, 22:14
yidaho
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 1,449
Originally posted by Goodfella
He is whoever he is.

Nice one, Sherlock.

If he isnt who we think he is

...who he claims he is..

then its all been made up.

You don't say..

If he is who he is then he can say whatever he wants to.

He can say whatever the hell he wants to (within TOS), no matter who he is!

He doesnt need to prove himself to us. If we dont believe him then thats our problem.

Indeed. And if we chose to question his identity then he should accept that we might be suspicious and not act in such an aggressive manner. That seems fair.
yidaho is offline  
Old 21-10-2003, 22:16
weymel
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dorset,UK
Posts: 98
Again I will say for the last time, I have NEVER used the words "fix, fixed or fixing" , It's a fact James, Jade and Tommy were excluded from winning, I have never said it was fixed.
weymel is offline  
Old 21-10-2003, 22:19
Goodfella
 
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by yidaho
Originally posted by Goodfella
He is whoever he is.

Nice one, Sherlock.

If he isnt who we think he is

...who he claims he is..

then its all been made up.

You don't say..

If he is who he is then he can say whatever he wants to.

He can say whatever the hell he wants to (within TOS), no matter who he is!

He doesnt need to prove himself to us. If we dont believe him then thats our problem.

Indeed. And if we chose to question his identity then he should accept that we might be suspicious and not act in such an aggressive manner. That seems fair.
thanks for mentioning the TOS bit. I forgot about that

Otherwise, you have just said what I said

if he is who he is then he is who he is

if he is CLAIMING to be someone else then he isnt who we think he is.

He doesnt need to prove who he is to us. But once he has, all these posts over the last hours are clogging up the threads.
 
Old 21-10-2003, 22:22
yidaho
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 1,449
Originally posted by Goodfella
well heres your original post.

<< Quite. I'm astounded that so many people on this forum appear to have been sucked in by the mad ramblings of a couple people claiming to be members of the contestants' families. I suggest they ought to take their 'fix' stories to the national papers, if there be any truth in the allegations, which I doubt. In fact, the only thread, as far as I can tell, that dared to question the credibility of these bizarre claims, has been removed. I'm also surprised that the DS moderators allow these defamatory posts to continue with such incessancy. Really. >>

not very welcoming is it ?
Nor is it unwelcoming. How do you suggest one might broach the subject, then? You did read Weymel's welcoming message on the forum that I frequent, I take it? This considered, I believe I was rather restrained.
yidaho is offline  
Old 21-10-2003, 22:22
weymel
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dorset,UK
Posts: 98
Did you get them KriZ, are they clear enough ?
weymel is offline  
Old 21-10-2003, 22:23
weymel
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dorset,UK
Posts: 98
This is the only forum I go on!
weymel is offline  
Old 21-10-2003, 22:28
Goodfella
 
Posts: n/a

well I have to say I am not surprised he said what he said (if it was him) and I would have probably said worse.

You did read the post he was replying to ?
 
Old 21-10-2003, 22:28
yidaho
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 1,449
Originally posted by weymel
Again I will say for the last time, I have NEVER used the words "fix, fixed or fixing" , It's a fact James, Jade and Tommy were excluded from winning, I have never said it was fixed.
Would it be fair to say that we, the public, were "deliberately misled", in that case? It was never revealed to the public that Jade and Tommy were excluded from winning. It's still something that would be of interest to the cheaper national papers, I feel. Have you approached them with your story?
yidaho is offline  
Old 21-10-2003, 22:33
yidaho
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 1,449
Originally posted by weymel
This is the only forum I go on!
So it is purely coincidental that someone is posing as Tommy's dad in free.uk.tv.bigbrother?

And that the poster claiming to be Tommy's dad in free.uk.tv.bigbrother also claims to post in this forum?

And that you have also mentioned free.uk.tv.bigbrother (if not by name) and have, in fact, recognised the people that have posted in this forum that originated from this newsgroup?

It's there for all to see.
yidaho is offline  
Old 21-10-2003, 22:35
weymel
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dorset,UK
Posts: 98
I don't even know if the public were misled, in the full sense of the word, they would argue that it was "just not shown in the edited highlights"
As for the press, do you honestly not think that I would love to? But you have to remember it is not about me, it is Tommy, and he is happy the way it is, now if you believe what I say about knowing the prize beforehand, then what I say now will make sense, Tommy was GLAD he didn't win, he hates travelling, he has turned down two prime time TV shows because it involved a fair amount of travel!
weymel is offline  
Old 21-10-2003, 22:38
Goodfella
 
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by yidaho
Would it be fair to say that we, the public, were "deliberately misled", in that case? It was never revealed to the public that Jade and Tommy were excluded from winning. It's still something that would be of interest to the cheaper national papers, I feel. Have you approached them with your story?
I think you believe Weymel is genuine too.
 
Old 21-10-2003, 22:39
KriZ
Banned User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: SE England
Posts: 4,200
Maybe true! - but he could have given the prize to me and I like going on TV as well
KriZ is offline  
Old 21-10-2003, 22:39
weymel
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dorset,UK
Posts: 98
Originally posted by yidaho
So it is purely coincidental that someone is posing as Tommy's dad in free.uk.tv.bigbrother?

Why not, are you saying that doesn't happen?

And that the poster claiming to be Tommy's dad in free.uk.tv.bigbrother also claims to post in this forum?

See above + has it not occured to you that someone in this forum doesn't like me and impersonated me?

And that you have also mentioned free.uk.tv.bigbrother (if not by name) and have, in fact, recognised the people that have posted in this forum that originated from this newsgroup?

I mentioned it because someone told me about it and how crap it was

It's there for all to see.
Only if you are blind
weymel is offline  
 
Closed Thread



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:09.