Originally Posted by RichmondBlue:
“I agree entirely. Rachel was overmarked ( again ) for doing a simple routine extremely well. I am not anti-Rachel, her Rumba a couple of weeks ago was magnificent, probably the first dance of the series worthy of a couple of 10's.
It strikes me that judges should take into account the "degree of difficulty" of any routine..that will encourage more ambitious choreography. Just performing the " basics" faultlessly is great, but the purpose of SCD is to entertain.
The public love the couple who can "sell" a dance. It doesnt necessarily have to be highly dramatic but it must make some kind of emotional connection, rather than look like someone just "going through the motions".”
I disagree that Rachel got it easy. Her Waltz may be understated because it's slow, so it looks deceptively simple. That's the beauty, to make difficult choreography look easy. You obviously did not pay attention to Strictly when they perform a technically good Waltz and an okay (i.e. simpler) one with lots of 'mood'.
Her Paso, ironically, was panned by Len for the very same reasons that Austin was panned. Lack of content. But I recalled Len giving Gethin 10 for his Paso even though the other three judges gave him an eight. So Gethin tried Spanish lines, Apels, twist turns and the lot, and many more. But he didn't do any of those that well so the other three 'non-technical' judges slated him. Speak about irony - to get a ten from Len (and eights from the other three), or to get tens from the other three, and eight from Len?