Hold only your hat Eejay... Lol!! Bear with me - the Daily Star if full of Big Brother stuff today. (for those who haven't heard of the phrase "wood" or "a woody" it's an erection)

Star (26/10/03 page 26)

Not Another Woody!

"Brekkie TV babe Kate Lawler has blamed her famous gaffes on soccar star lover Jonathan Woodgate...because he can RI:SE all night.

She says Big Woody's score card leaves her so knackered that she hardly knowns what she's doing at the Channel 4 studios.

She sighed "Things are going so well with Johnathan but he likes to keep me up all night. And, well, sometimes the tiredness affects my concentration".

Kate, 23 met Woodgate on holiday in Ibiza in July. They've been unseparable since. But viewers had noticed that something was distraction the Big Brother blonde. Her catalogue of blunders include declaring Hitler "a great leader", flicking a V-sign at the crew when she thought the cameras were off, flashing her knicks and declaring Venice "a country". She even read her own name from the autoque as "Keet".

Ri:se will fall off the scedules on Dec 19 so she's not got long to go.

Meanwhile Woodgate, 23, has a stomach strain.Or at least that's what the official bulletin says."

Thoughts?
Last edited by Emzi : 26-10-2003 at 13:25

Well now I have heard it all. It's not just because you are a cr*p TV co-presenter then Kate.

I don't know, it's said 'A bad workwoman always blames her tools .

Speechless!

It's a conspiracy

Woody-Gate

You've got to hand it to Kate she's a seriously classy lady.

And what's her excuse for the pre-Woodenhead period?

I thought it...but Susanne said it first....It's because she's crap.....

WHAT ! WHAT!

PAGE 26!

Thanks Emzi, you're a pal. I now have my own copy of this!

So not only is Kate a crap TV presenter but by making comments like this, she has admitted that she is as common as muck which of course some us spotted a long time ago. I wonder what her precious daddy is going to think of this.

So what part of this do you find amusing Mr Cinic?

I would really like to know.

(It seems to be page 27 but I guess for a reporter that is close enough eh?)

I also do not like the word common by the way myself.

Right -wait for it.......


My fiend is a missionery....


Er i can use some help from Alastair on this one


Hold on-I see something interesting -does anyone else?

I find it all highly & delightfully entertaining. It has confirmed what many of the more enlightened members of this Forum have been saying for a long time.

PS - I am not a reporter.

In what way?
Can you manage anything specific - like a fact or something-or perhaps another vague general comment.

PS -i never said you were but presumably the post originator is.

No it's not acceptable. Not for this reporter anyway. Sorry if I got the page number wrong, folks.

I can't even tell you what the page number now as I've just used the paper to mop up a load of turpentine!!

Where did the toe-rag go?

Answering my own posts –how sad.

THE STRANGE CASE OF THE TATTOO THAT GOT UP AND MOVED SIX INCHES.

Well my dear Watson my suspicions were alerted when I studied the photo-which we all know –or do we?

I noticed the well known , strangely erotic and inexplicable tattoo is on the wrong side in this photo.
So why no original photo with article? And why lift it from the original papping at the Mirror-they have forgotten to copy it back once more to get the right side-rather shoddy.

Only point is has KLL provided this story or not?
Seems the key point.
Obviousely I have no idea and can only work on evidence.
Your hysterical and rude reaction shows you see and believe what you want to-given your biased and wierd opinions which rarely have any factual basis.

I could have written this story myself from various bits in the past on public record ie made it up
The only new bit is the quote in the 3rd paragraph which could also have been made up to make it look like KLL has inspired it.
Other small mistakes repeated from previous souces -this V sign-like to know when that was given-date please-and the fact that they do not use autocue. I am also not sure his nickname is Woody but maybe makes a good story.And if it is a jokey plant story to explain so called mistakes that have been made-why not explain that less mistakes are made now than in the past-it seems to me.
Why not check the facts with the implied source and get the facts right and make it kinder to the source.

Also and most tellingly they have been ultra discrete since the suspicious papping in the original Mirror some time ago.Where are the articles?Has it made OK-"Our New Love"-well maybe it will next week but there has been little in the media.So why p27 of the Daily Star?
Also last week KLL was teased a couple of times by Iain and Dougie separately but refused to be drawn.
It is at least consistent that given his history and desire to keep out of the papers and the fact that he is recovering from an op and lives and has treatment 400 miles way that they do not see each other very often which makes it hard to explain the story.

Maybe KLL did provide the quote –which is a little cheeky-and has been built around to say something it does not say. It seems to me a hatchet job even so.

What disappoints me is that what I thought was a more intelligent and fair minded forum of people should have been so crass in choosing to believe something because it is in the paper.

It will be interesting to see what occurs-she cannot sue can she. And presumably may just roll with it and keep it quiet or large it up but that does not much matter –your reaction to what was in front of you still exists.

It is halfway possible this sort of stuff could even feasibly split them up because of the difficulties (–but maybe I am being sensitive as I like her to be happy as I did in the BB3 house-she seems a nice person and my admiration is undiminished.)

Presumably that would make you even more happy for some reason.

It is a small story and is maybe irrelevant to her and she may even have had input into it-but it shows more about a few people around here in my eyes.

OK rant over.

Apologies are acceptable. Hopefully they might come in time.

Goodnight.



:yawn: :yawn: :yawn: :sleep:

"My career is f**ked because I'm getting f**ked too much"

1 I have to disagree with your claim that Kate is making fewer mistakes now than before. I have seen no evidence of that.

2 The people who have posted in this thread do not necessarily believe every word written in the tabloids. They are just having a bit of fun.

3 I really don't think that Kate splitting up with this footballer person would make a single FM happy. I'm sure nobody cares one way or the other (apart from you).

it would make me a little bit happier 'cos he's a rotter and nowhere near good enough for her

Dump him, Katie !!

I agree with Vilt on this one. I have it on tape.

Quote:
“2 The people who have posted in this thread do not necessarily believe every word written in the tabloids. They are just having a bit of fun.”

I largely agree with you, but I would add that a few fms may have extra or even different motives.

Quote:
“3 I really don't think that Kate splitting up with this footballer person would make a single FM happy. I'm sure nobody cares one way or the other (apart from you).”

I think I'm with swing on this one.

[quote]Originally posted by lulu g
1 I have to disagree with your claim that Kate is making fewer mistakes now than before. I have seen no evidence of that.

I've seen plenty. For evidence may I suggest Channel 4 between the hours of 7.00 A.M. and 9.00 A.M. on any weekday she happens to be working.

2 The people who have posted in this thread do not necessarily believe every word written in the tabloids. They are just having a bit of fun.

True.......That story about Cameron was true though.

3 I really don't think that Kate splitting up with this footballer person would make a single FM happy. I'm sure nobody cares one way or the other (apart from you).

It wouldn't ruin my day.....

Hee Hee................just about says it all dont it ??

Pedro

Oh no! RG has wheeled out his weapon of mass destruction (as coached by Mystic, darling, et al)! I'm sure you know that I have never taped RI:SE, nor am I ever likely to, but my eyes and ears are in working order, so we will have to agree to disagree on this one (again ).