Originally Posted by fatskia:
“I wasn't trying to put down Zoe's Tango. She danced it better in the final and got the same score, so I could have linked that one, which had less errors. Both were great performances.
This was Rachel's first attempt so I thought that was fairer.
I'm no dancer, but I just love the precision of Rachel's dancing. She is small, which can help with sharpness, which I think was there when there were sharp moves to do.
Some people prefer performance and dont worry about details, but for me, the extra trouble and skill required to get the details right, gives a dance a kind of wow factor.”
I agree with this. I would say that the VERY best dances combine both technical excellence and performance.
I think that too manny errors - or a posture problem (for example) actually detracts from the 'wow' factor of a dance.
I would also argue that a high level of technical ability (it doesn't have to be absolutely perfect -Allesha's latin-) gives the dancer the tools to deliver the emotion and performance in a dance.
As a poet has the ability to communicate emotion through their understanding and artistic use of words. Most dancers need a framework of reference and technical understanding.
It's no good just to feel it - the feeling of the dance has to be communicated to its audience.