• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Why couldn't Tess get her leg up on Saturday?
Easylistener
08-12-2008
I missed the start of Saturday's show but noticed on ITT that Tess seemed to have difficulty getting her leg up at the end of her introductory dance with Bruce. Was there any reason?
bitchy_me
08-12-2008
Her dress was too tight. I don't mean too tight for her, it looked lovely, but too tight to enable her to lift her leg.
JamieHT
08-12-2008
She's not been very sensible with her dress choices this year, wearing long ones on the Sat show and short ones on the Sunday show, should be the other way round. I would like to add that this week's dresses were dreadful and were too tight on here for sure. She looked awful. I love Tess, but please don't wear dresses like that again.
cosmic dancer
08-12-2008
Yes, the white one was terribly unflattering. Doesn't she look in a mirror before going on television?? Overall, though, her dresses are much nicer this year than all the tin foil wrappings she wore previously.
jjackson42
08-12-2008
Better ask Vernon!
mariafitz
08-12-2008
Originally Posted by jjackson42:
“Better ask Vernon!”

Well if there was a bookies taking bets...Then Tess is with child..IMHO..without a doubt and that dress did nothing to hide the fact...i shall await the happy news..
Last edited by mariafitz : 08-12-2008 at 22:41
Fudd
08-12-2008
Why couldn't Tess get her leg up on Saturday?

Because she was trying to get it over?
Ignazio
08-12-2008
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“Why couldn't Tess get her leg up on Saturday?

Because she was trying to get it over? ”

You took the words right out of my mouth

But not even Tess would try to get her leg over Brucie.
WelshShell
08-12-2008
Originally Posted by mariafitz:
“Well if there was a bookies taking bets...Then Tess is with child..IMHO..without a doubt and that dress did nothing to hide the fact...i shall await the happy news..”

I 100% agree. I had a text the week before from a friend asking if she was with child, both dresses this weekend did nothing to dispell this idea!
BlackOpal
08-12-2008
I don't think she is pregnant, just a way too fitting dress and not wearing the right undies
samiskim
08-12-2008
Originally Posted by Ignazio:
“You took the words right out of my mouth

But not even Tess would try to get her leg over Brucie.”

Brucie is a happily married man and is married to a former Miss World - why would he want mince when he has steak at home?
FarmLoon
08-12-2008
It was quite long. She didn't keep hold of the train part of the dress. She stood on it. That's why she couldn't get her leg up.
Geeny
09-12-2008
On it taked two the day before Im sure she wore a bandage
ESPIONdansant
09-12-2008
There are only 2 useful words in the title of this thread. In the wrong order though.


It should read:

Tess




why?
kassieq
09-12-2008
Originally Posted by ESPIONdansant:
“There are only 2 useful words in the title of this thread. In the wrong order though.


It should read:

Tess




why?”



Like a few others I read leg over, what minds
trevvytrev21
09-12-2008
Originally Posted by cosmic dancer:
“Yes, the white one was terribly unflattering. Doesn't she look in a mirror before going on television?? Overall, though, her dresses are much nicer this year than all the tin foil wrappings she wore previously.”

Having flashbacks to last year's shiny gold foil dress with a big tacky ribbon on her bust. Horrendous fashion sense but have liked nearly all her dresses this year.
Stella Street
09-12-2008
Originally Posted by cosmic dancer:
“Yes, the white one was terribly unflattering. Doesn't she look in a mirror before going on television?? Overall, though, her dresses are much nicer this year than all the tin foil wrappings she wore previously.”

Unfortunately that's true. As unflattering as the dresses have been this year, they are actually an improvement.
As for the short ones she sometimes wears on Saturday I think they look really tacky.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map