I missed this last night and wondered what all the fuss was about

.
Having just watched it on iplayer (and hoping it's Sky+'d as I set it!), I wonder why, together with all the criticism levelled at Brendan (and yes, he was a little -erm - blunt! -although I could see where he's coming from and I am
definitely not a fan of his!!!

) no-one has actually commented on the fact that he said he was upset for Austin and Erin (as in having mixed emotions - which Lisa reiterated) in that they have got through at the expense of someone else.
In fact, what he actually intimated at this point was that they were gutted for Austin and Erin (seeing the heartbreak in their eyes) and that
he didn't want to be the one to ruin someone else's 6 months of hard work (yes, that's what he said - not a reference to the other two having danced for longer or indeed anything else). And Lisa agreed wholeheartedly with him at this point.
Instead, everyone is focusing on the negative aspects of his comments about the judging (whether we agree or not about the marks,
that is what he was commenting on; not Austin and Erin personally). You'd think we could give him a
little credit for actually owning to being upset for the others and saying how close everyone is.
And nowhere did I hear them say that they were under the impression that Austin and Erin thought they had it in the bag. What I heard them
acknowledge was that these two had been favourites with
everyone else to win. And, of course, A&E
wanted to win it - as they all did!!! It was not in any way (at least to me - as an unbiased viewer, who is, as I say, not even a Brendan fan!!) a comment aimed AT Erin and Austin or any accusation that they themselves thought they were definite shoe-ins for the title.
If I had time I'd do a transcript so we could all see what was actually said, but maybe someone else will do that and we can judge things a bit better.
I'm in no way defending Brendan - I think he was a little bit TOO honest and could have couched things better.
However, so
many posters on this forum this year have complained about the judges' marking (as happens every year, incidentally!

) - there have been threads galore about this topic alone! So it seems a tad disingenuous of us to then make a big song and dance about it when one of the pros actually comes out and agrees with us!!!

(Albeit in relation to the scores of someone else and not themselves - although I would like to point out that Brendan also said that
he thought their '9' from Bruno for the jive was very generous and that the rest of them - '8's - were right).
I do agree that Brendan was a little too honest. However, it does seem that there is one rule for those on TV/media(not just relating to SCD but anywhere) and one rule for
us here.
It does appear (to me), that we as posters on DS (and those on other forums, too, presumably) are allowed to express our opinions (in whatever manner - from polite criticism to downwright villification in some cases!

) about those in the limelight but they themselves are not accorded the same right - to the first option, obviously! I would be leaping on that soapbox myself if any of them were nasty about the other contestants. That's not what I saw, though!!
They're people too. With as many flaws as the rest of us (who here can claim to be perfect?). So why are they not allowed to have the same right to freedom of speech?
Just a thought!