• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Tom getting through to the final is bad for SCD
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
tutti_frutti_79
12-12-2008
Originally Posted by teewoods:
“Its obvious if he gets to the final there would be no point as he would win regarldess of how horrible he dances. Thanks to the biased female public vote

Lisa vs Rachel would be a better final and something worth looking forward to as no one knows who would win fo certain”

Get over yourself love. You are so up your own a**e if you think that. Who are you to presume to know how everyone else thinks???

I really can't stand Tom or Lisa. I really do believe Rachel deserves to win.

However, my hubby, dad and lots of my male friends all think Tom should win and will be voting for him.

Lets stop with all the silly, stupid sexist opinions shall we.
Servalan
12-12-2008
Originally Posted by thenetworkbabe:
“The reason why Rachel might top the judges leaderboard is that she might well outperform everyone else. its not engineered - except by who does better and who has a bad night. I doubt if Len and Craig fixed it months ago for some people to get lousy music and poor dances in the wrong weeks.


The rules don't need changing. All the rules do is stop the most popular dancer getting to the final automatically if he is worst on the night. He gets through if he is second or better or if the best dancer is the least popular. A top dancer who is second with the public ought by any logic to go through easier than someone who danced weakest and who ought to face the dance off. The worst dancer going in the dance off idea is there to ensure that the final isn't between the best and worst or the best dancer sits out the final and makes it pointless. Thats logical too. All the most popular dancer has to do is not be worst - which isn't much to ask someone who will otherwise win.”

That depends on what you mean by 'outperform', doesn't it?

I'm sure Rachel will be technically excellent. She always is. But while this may be important to the judges, the public watch with different eyes - look at John Sergeant, if you want the most extreme example of that. Strictly isn't just a dance competition - it's a reality show ... but the judges seem hellbent on ignoring that.

The public vote is being negated by the judges. Over and over again this series. Overmarking and overhyping have skewed the board and the playing field has been anything but level - leaving us with a final three where the public aren't particularly interested in two of the contestants.

I don't think Len and Craig fixed the choice of dances BUT I think you will find a LOT of people on here who feel the 'different dance each week' system has been used by the producers to help influence who stays or goes.

You'll also find a LOT of people arguing for the dance-off to be either feature the lowest-voting dance or to be dropped entirely. You may not agree with that - but there is a real call for change building, and the BBC would do well to start listening ...
katmobile
12-12-2008
Originally Posted by teewoods:
“Its obvious if he gets to the final there would be no point as he would win regarldess of how horrible he dances. Thanks to the biased female public vote

Lisa vs Rachel would be a better final and something worth looking forward to as no one knows who would win fo certain”

So we should just get the final the judges think we should have is that it?

I'm sorry but rack off with the female biased vote - I voted for both Jodie (twice) and Heather with year but I don't want a female final because I think it would be wrong to have a final between two contestants that the public don't care about and I don't want the over-rated Lisa to win.
Fairynuff
12-12-2008
Will the dance off work the same way as last week i.e. dance off with best scoring dance?
Both Tom and Lisa being very bold going for dances they didn't score that well in. Not sure how Rachel's AS was marked.
mossy2103
12-12-2008
Originally Posted by jill1812:
“And maybe, this is a wild and wacky theory, they will vote for who they think dance's the best. ”

Oh please, that is far too sensible a theory surely.
Tissy
12-12-2008
Tom`s jive 33
Rachel`s AS 35
Lisa`s QS 35 <is she doing the QS tomorrow night?>

So Lisa and Rachel playing safe, Tom taking a gamble - hope it pays off for him!
dancingbearbear
12-12-2008
Originally Posted by SCD-Observer:
“You did say ALL. But you say the 'biased female votes', which is a sweeping generalisation. If you say some or MANY, you may still have a point. ”

From what I've seen of this poster he favours sweeping, deliberately provocative statements about what he sees as female failings. His pathetic (and now locked ) thread about Flavia & Vincent is a case in point.

Add this troll to your ignore list and wait for the inevitable ban
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map