• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Am i right in thinking
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
Paperbag_Writer
17-12-2008
Originally Posted by gorlagon:
“I think it will be very interesting if Tom *did* win the public vote last week, even with some (we don't know how many) votes not being cast by people savvy enough to see the waste and some more (we don't know how many more) votes being cast by people savvy enough to see the waste AND vote tactically for one the girls instead.

Either way, he'll have had fewer votes and the girls will have had more than they otherwise would have. So, if Tom still tops the viewer league then, as far as I can see, if the tie hadn't happened, he'd have had a 50% chance of going through without dancing off last week. And if he had, he'd have won the whole thing by a country mile.

Therefore, for me, it's a 50% chance Tom is going into this final with an unfair handicap.”

That's not necessarily the case, gorlagon. It wasn't just Tom's supporters who may have felt it a waste of time to vote last Saturday. I'd imagine fans of either Rachel or Lisa would have had to have been supremely confident that their girl would have survived a dance-off against Tom. For that not to happen, Rachel or Lisa would have needed a near meltdown situation to occur in their routines. Possible, of course, but not probable.
gorlagon
17-12-2008
Oh yes! Ha. As soon as you think you've worked it out, another possibility slaps you in the face with a wet fish! It really is a right royal b4lls up, isn't it?!

So. Every competitor, by the rules of the competition, not by rough justice, opinion, or anything else, but by the rules of the competition, must have a chance of being saved by the public.

That, basically, is the thing I think that the people who think an eventual Tom win would be tarnished, are missing.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map