|
||||||||
N85 vs. N96 vs. C905 |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Not far enough
Posts: 12,248
|
N85 vs. N96 vs. C905
Its upgrade time fast approaching! I think I've whittled it down to a choice of three phones, the n85, n96 or the se905. Reading reviews of the n96 it seems to have some issues with a slow processing speed leading to locking up and just taking an age to do anything..? The 905 seems to have a common fault with the earpiece. The n85 might just have the edge for reliability, and is a little cheaper p/m - they all seem to have very similar features - and I'm not sure that an 8mp camera is a necessity!
And would the lack of xenon flash make a huge difference to picture quality..? Which would you choose..? I want mainly from a phone a good camera, ease of texting, internet access (wifi would be great, not had that before), a decent mp3 ability - with good volume on earphones, bluetooth everything, some good java games (and the ability to download and install extras) and - oh yes! I need to be able to make and take calls on it
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Spalding Lincolnshire
Posts: 3,927
|
C905 defo awesome phone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 43,524
|
speaking of cameras again i feel the need to post these taken with my n95-2 (i presume the n96 is the same camera.)
http://nigelcoldwell.co.uk/test/10032008036.jpg http://nigelcoldwell.co.uk/test/24052008200.jpg http://nigelcoldwell.co.uk/test/24052008201.jpg http://nigelcoldwell.co.uk/test/24052008204.jpg I personally think that 8mp is not necessary with a phone, it just makes the files harder to handle, and the quality of an image is not defined by res but the optics and sensor. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Not far enough
Posts: 12,248
|
fletchem that Samsung looks very interesting! Not available on o2 yet, why o why o why? Same with the n85! Tsk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 12,983
|
Quote:
fletchem that Samsung looks very interesting! Not available on o2 yet, why o why o why? Same with the n85! Tsk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Billingham
Posts: 1,165
|
I'm putting a vote in for the N85. I've had it for a week and am extremely impressed. Used to have the N95
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Camberely, Surrey, UK
Posts: 515
|
Quote:
I'm putting a vote in for the N85. I've had it for a week and am extremely impressed. Used to have the N95
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Not far enough
Posts: 12,248
|
Cullimore, was the dust issue the only thing that made you unhappy with the handset?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:43.

And would the lack of xenon flash make a huge difference to picture quality..? Which would you choose..? I want mainly from a phone a good camera, ease of texting, internet access (wifi would be great, not had that before), a decent mp3 ability - with good volume on earphones, bluetooth everything, some good java games (and the ability to download and install extras) and - oh yes! I need to be able to make and take calls on it 