Originally Posted by gslam2:
“She can be overly critical but I love her commentaries - they are always great fun and the banter between her and Davison is always amusing.
She normally has interesting things to say about the way making TV has changed over the years as well.
Even when Waterhouse and Sutton do say something it tends to be stupid or pointless in his case and dull and bland in hers so I'm quite happy to have Fielding & Davison there to liven things up.”
I disagree.
I would certainly concur that the Peter Davison era was not a golden age of the programme, but even I was staggered by what a low opinion Peter and Janet obviously have of the show. When they aren't criticising the stagey sets, they are criticising the effects, the other actors' performances, the producer, the directors. It's got even worse since New Who came along, which they obviously both would rather be in. I couldn't believe it on the Warriors of the Deep DVD when she basically dismissed JNT as a producer, the man who gave her the only significant job of her acting career, and said that Russell is so much better because he's a writer and a genius. She then went on to say "look at the difference" between old Who and New Who because the old show never had writers as producers. I thought to myself "the old show lasted for 26 years Janet. They must have been doing something right". I just thought it was so insulting and nobody, except Matthew Robinson on the Resurrection DVD, ever stands up to her when she's talking out of her hat.
I do find it amazing that Janet Fielding does nothing but slag the show when it's actually the only reason she's famous. She never had much of a career in anything else.
I'm not against people spotting the flaws in the show, because it always had flaws, and other commentaries also have that. But I get the sense from other commentaries from most eras that the people working on the show had some respect and affection for the show they were making. I don't get that feeling from Janet Fielding at all. Peter's not much better but at least he occasionally says something nice. I've heard enough Fielding commentaries now and they've become rather predictable. I'd prefer to hear other people on future Davison era DVDs.