I had a text message from BB yesterday saying that Paul had been advised by a psychologist to ask the other housemates why they keep voting for him. The response was silence!
I think it would be really funny this week if no-one nominated him, or if he didn't receive enough votes to be on the eviction list. That would really confuse the poor chappy. Shame though cos I quite like him - yes his stories are boring, long winded and most unbelievable but I can't help laughing when I see how often he checks his hair in the mirrors.
Maybe the other five will realise there's no point nominating Paul because the great British public won't let him out!
Vote Paul out though and which guys are we left with:
Dean: boring, irritable, dull (with the great exception of his impression of Narinder during the soap opera).
Josh: a complete let down. Pleasing on the eyes but all the things he promised to bring to the house (nudity, nocturnal activity - not that I particularly wanted those things and in fact didn't vote him in) was just a pack of lies. He's done nothing except sleep, sunbathe, play backgammon and give Brian even more of an insecurity complex than he already had.
Brian: OK, the novelty of him has worn off. He's even more childish than Helen (who I think is great) and his over-active use of the word "evil" is really being to p me off.
Katie.