Originally Posted by CaroUK:
“David Seaman has done both shows and beat Jessica in the BBC show - she was top with the judges and he was top with the public so won!
He was a hockey jock and she had skating lessons as a child so both had experience before the show - however her publicity says she hadn't skated since childhood when she did Strictly Ice Dancing (which involved 4 weeks training and one show), and hasn't skated since she did that.
I'd imagine she is pretty rusty if that is true, and while she might have an advantage at the beginning, we'e seen complete non skaters come through to win 2 out of the 3 series. David Seaman only managed 4th place in DOI 1 despite winning SID (although had it been on scores and votes only with no skate off (against Bonnie) - he would probably have made the final.”
Depends how SID was decided - was it largely down to the public and how good was the competition? I agree coming behind David doesn't suggest Jessica was that good.
The betting odds though are heavily in favour of the people who have skating experience (Ray and Jessica) plus anyone with a current ITV show or evidence of past support in a talent show) - not as far as we know leaks of who looks most physically or artistically enabled.
Its going to be important for anyone else good to start pretty well and make an impact. if they don't, they may find they are in a pack of similar people competing for whats left of the votes as people get behind people who start with what may turn out to be an important advantage - more so this year when a lot of the girls are similar in age and probably ability.