Originally Posted by Bob_Cat:
“Non-freesat mode has never been a priority for us because we do not yet have extensive feedback that it is an important feature to a wide range of consumers. If people consider it to be a truly significant then they should email support some encouragement, we will note this feedback and consider the resources for development. Please respect that resources cost money, only where a feature is important to a majority of consumers is it worth applying resources and if resource is applied here another feature could be delayed.”
With respect, isn't that the wrong way round to look at this?
If a low priority function is negatively impacting a core function, I would say that fixing it should be considered important.
It's not the fact that non-freesat mode may or may not be important to customers, it's the fact that it's screwing up something that is.