|
||||||||
Software/Firmware update Foxsat HDR |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Redditch Worcs
Posts: 17,289
|
Quote:
Hi,
As a newcommer to the HDR, I search the net to discover more about the device and came across this forum. I read with interest that a new firmware is being written and, it would seem, many are champing at the bit for its release. However, I am unsure about the 'bugs' that have been aired in these pages. Surely, something like, not being able to delete whilst another recording is in progress, is a feature that doesn't exist, not a bug. Is there an extensive list of bugs i.e. things that don't work as intended and a list of 'nice to have's'? And, out of these lists, what is being tackled in development. I don't know why, but I have to admit to having a sneaking suspision that the new release will be a jaw dropper. PJ |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Surrey
Posts: 71
|
Quote:
It's not a bug in itself but deletion while recording was possible in v01 firmware which was removed in v02 due to a bug that could corrupt the file system.
PJ |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hawkwell, Essex
Posts: 2,186
|
Quote:
Hi,
As a newcommer to the HDR, I search the net to discover more about the device and came across this forum. I read with interest that a new firmware is being written and, it would seem, many are champing at the bit for its release. However, I am unsure about the 'bugs' that have been aired in these pages. Surely, something like, not being able to delete whilst another recording is in progress, is a feature that doesn't exist, not a bug. Is there an extensive list of bugs i.e. things that don't work as intended and a list of 'nice to have's'? And, out of these lists, what is being tackled in development. I don't know why, but I have to admit to having a sneaking suspision that the new release will be a jaw dropper. PJ Welcome to the forums, and being a new HDR owner. There are various threads that you can find which list Bugs, and others list Feature Requests. There is no list, that I know, of things that are being worked on (not publicly available, anyway). A good source of information is available over at Hummy.org, especially the FAQs here, are worth a good read. Rgds. Les. |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Redditch Worcs
Posts: 17,289
|
Quote:
Hi,
As a newcommer to the HDR, I search the net to discover more about the device and came across this forum. I read with interest that a new firmware is being written and, it would seem, many are champing at the bit for its release. However, I am unsure about the 'bugs' that have been aired in these pages. Surely, something like, not being able to delete whilst another recording is in progress, is a feature that doesn't exist, not a bug. Is there an extensive list of bugs i.e. things that don't work as intended and a list of 'nice to have's'? And, out of these lists, what is being tackled in development. I don't know why, but I have to admit to having a sneaking suspision that the new release will be a jaw dropper. PJ |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 972
|
Quote:
I don't know why, but I have to admit to having a sneaking suspision that the new release will be a jaw dropper. PJ |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Rossendale Valley
Posts: 106
|
Quote:
Hi,
I don't know why, but I have to admit to having a sneaking suspision that the new release will be a jaw dropper. PJ I love my PVR but always like it when new software is released. I can wait as long as required though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Durham
Posts: 73
|
Does anyone else feel that the advent of firmware updates (like patches for games) has made manufacturers a bit lazy? It used to be that if you released a product with bad firmware, that reviews and word of mouth meant you had to either recall the product or release a follow-up. Now bugs in firmwares are greeted with reports of patches and updates which often never appear. The manufacturers will always bring out the "adding new features" lines - although these often add new bugs. It also leads to angry people who purchased the unit only after hearing the bugs would be sorted out via an update.
I have just bought a feesat HD box. I was looking at getting a pvr, but the current bugs convinced me not to get one. Promises of patches mean nothing to me until they are released. |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 62
|
Whatever happened to being able to download the firmware and update from a usb stick? I'm sure this was supposed to be available again - or can you only get it if you contact Humax direct?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Bucks
Posts: 90
|
The HD schedule problem should be addressed as quite important, if anything is updated like channel line-ups etc the HD schedules get scrubbed out to me that is quite a serious issue, I only discovered this once I had purchased the unit so I didn’t do my homework very well did I. (Humax FoxSat)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,494
|
radioFab every box has issues.
I believe some people have reported some teething problems with the Panasonic on here, which is considerably more expensive than the Humax and a Japanese name you associate with absolute quality. The cheaper boxes than the Humax have their own set of problems - many of the SD boxes allegedly have reliability issues, many of the HD boxes allegedly have recording restrictions (channel scanning restrictions) that the Humax doesn't have. No amount of research would have got you a better box than the Humax. Even the Sky boxes allegedly have reliability issues. How many people do you know who's box has allegedly self destructed within a day or two of the end of the warranty? I know a few along with many who's boxes never made it through the warranty period. As for the Humax, when you look at the length of the list of reported bugs / feature requests, is it any surprise that it takes a long time to work through them all? I for one would rather Humax took their time and fixed everything and added many wanted features and beta tested it all thoroughly before release than rushed it out full of further bugs. I used to play online games a lot and the number of times on a big name game that a big name gaming company rushed out patches that fixed 1 bug but caused 4 others for every one fixed was unbelievable. We really don't want that to happen with Humax. The lack of an update is frustrating but I'll take frustration over a buggy release anyday. The Humax is perfectly usable as it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Bucks
Posts: 90
|
White-Knight I didn’t mean for my post to be taken that I was thinking the Humax is rubbish far from it, there is plenty of pluses 2 off the top of my head is how cool it runs & how sensitive the tuners are, I was purely voicing that it will be nice when that’s ironed out, I also record the SD as well as the HD at the same time so if it fails at least I can watch the programme.
I also totally agree that every unit has it’s bugs / faults my Sky HD which is a Thompson, I needed to replace the components in the power supply because of missing channels and it got as hot as a toaster, and before the EPG was changed it froze all the time but I must admit the new EPG works fine now |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: South Coast, UK
Posts: 4,952
|
Quote:
As for the Humax, when you look at the length of the list of reported bugs / feature requests, is it any surprise that it takes a long time to work through them all?
![]() Also if Humax knew they were working on a new model for early 2010 why on earth did they worry about iPlayer support for the HDR? The new model having full iPlayer support would have been another reason a consumer may wish to upgrade his/her old HDR to the new one. Instead this long, long, long wait for any progress I suspect will have the opposite effects on sales with users suspecting the new box will also never have any firmware updates like our HDR model. Automan. |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,494
|
Quote:
So far in ten months they have not resolved a single one
![]() Quote:
...Humax took their time and fixed everything and added many wanted features and beta tested it all thoroughly before release than rushed it out full of further bugs.
I used to play online games a lot and the number of times on a big name game that a big name gaming company rushed out patches that fixed 1 bug but caused 4 others for every one fixed was unbelievable. We really don't want that to happen with Humax. The lack of an update is frustrating but I'll take frustration over a buggy release anyday. The Humax is perfectly usable as it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 821
|
Quote:
Does anyone else feel that the advent of firmware updates (like patches for games) has made manufacturers a bit lazy? It used to be that if you released a product with bad firmware, that reviews and word of mouth meant you had to either recall the product or release a follow-up. Now bugs in firmwares are greeted with reports of patches and updates which often never appear. The manufacturers will always bring out the "adding new features" lines - although these often add new bugs. It also leads to angry people who purchased the unit only after hearing the bugs would be sorted out via an update.
I have just bought a feesat HD box. I was looking at getting a pvr, but the current bugs convinced me not to get one. Promises of patches mean nothing to me until they are released. As for being put off buying the PVR due to the issues list, its a REALLY excellent (if not completely flawless product), having a PVR changes the way you live your life - unless you've had one you really don't know what you're missing. Ultimately I think that was a bad call. |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 253
|
Quoting white-night..
As for the Humax, when you look at the length of the list of reported bugs / feature requests, is it any surprise that it takes a long time to work through them all? no none whatsoever - there are so many of them.. The lack of an update is frustrating but I'll take frustration over a buggy release anyday. I am not saying it is going to happen but what about the following - also possible scenario - frustration and a buggy release? Unfortunately there is just so much to fix, what if we are left with a buggy release because Humax have moved on? Taking time to do something doesn't mean as much if they are struggling with a lack of resources..I think it would have been better to have had several good releases up to now and if they can't afford an over the air upgrade to have put them on their website. ! The Humax is perfectly usable as it is. Now here - I am not sure what you mean by "perfectly usable"? I agree it is usable, yes - but perfectly?? Depends on what you expect I suppose. The very minimum I expect is for a PVR to record reliably with a minimum of babysitting - if a pvr doesn't do that, then for me it is less than perfectly usable.. Patrick |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: South Coast, UK
Posts: 4,952
|
Quote:
Because they're doing a single release and its better:
Surely the more things you change at once the greater the chance for a unforseen side effect. Automan. |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Bucks
Posts: 90
|
Quote:
Quoting white-night..
The very minimum I expect is for a PVR to record reliably with a minimum of babysitting - if a pvr doesn't do that, then for me it is less than perfectly usable..[/b][/i] Patrick I did mention to Humax technical that the favourite channels list was also a little bit strange to get used to and they said a few people have mentioned this (the sky is just one button) the Humax is a bit of a fiddle to get it out of automatic mode which I don’t like, maybe it’s me not sure. Also when Sky updates the station line up etc it just does it with no fuss but the Humax prompts you with a box e.g. 1 new station added do you want to update the channels or something similar to that, why don’t the Humax just do it without the fuss. |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cradley, Halesowen, W.Mids
Posts: 1,047
|
Quote:
The Humax is perfectly usable as it is.
Now here - I am not sure what you mean by "perfectly usable"? I agree it is usable, yes - but perfectly?? Depends on what you expect I suppose. The very minimum I expect is for a PVR to record reliably with a minimum of babysitting - if a pvr doesn't do that, then for me it is less than perfectly usable.. Patrick |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: West Riding of Yorkshire
Posts: 1,100
|
Quote:
As for the Humax, when you look at the length of the list of reported bugs / feature requests, is it any surprise that it takes a long time to work through them all?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,330
|
Quote:
Quoting white-night..
Now here - I am not sure what you mean by "perfectly usable"? I agree it is usable, yes - but perfectly?? Depends on what you expect I suppose. The very minimum I expect is for a PVR to record reliably with a minimum of babysitting - if a pvr doesn't do that, then for me it is less than perfectly usable.. Patrick It strikes me that anybody that praises the HDR gets there opinion criticised. So I agree with White Knight. it is perfectly usable. Thats got nothing to do with my expectations. Just a bit of patience learning the boxes quirks. Lets not get into another pointless argument again because peoples opinions differ. |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cradley, Halesowen, W.Mids
Posts: 1,047
|
Quote:
Thats got nothing to do with my expectations. Just a bit of patience learning the boxes quirks.
However my expectations for a PVR is that it should record following a power cut and should not remove programs from its recording schedule all on its own. I have had a Freeview PVR for many years and have got used to the fact that it would just sit there and record everything I set and did not require baby sitting. |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants (New Forest)
Posts: 1,665
|
Quote:
Agreed - A PVR that that wipes scheduled timers following a rescan and also that fails to record following a power cut is far from perfectly usable.
ISTM that if it was not, the problem of lost timers are not Humax's fault. If I am wrong a reasoned explanation would be appreciated by me, at least, and possibly others. |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cradley, Halesowen, W.Mids
Posts: 1,047
|
Quote:
Can someone remind me, whether ITV's HD being on the red button was known about soon enough in HDR's development?
ISTM that if it was not, the problem of lost timers are not Humax's fault. If I am wrong a reasoned explanation would be appreciated by me, at least, and possibly others. *Bit of brain fade here - can't remember whether it was Mid October or November 2008 the HDR was available
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 28,527
|
I'm not a humax employee, but I am a subscribed member of the HDR fan club. Mine is in the loft, so opportunities for fiddling are limited. It has never been restarted in a year, and has performed far more reliably than the skyHD box it replaced. I am of the opinion that some members here need a sense of perspective. There's a kind of gang histeria that takes hold on DS, and the HDR has been mugged by it. I am a reseller, and I have also not had a single return of a HDR, not one. I daresay it'll come, as they age, but I can only speak as I find.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cradley, Halesowen, W.Mids
Posts: 1,047
|
Quote:
It has never been restarted in a year.
It's the quite obvious bugs (power cut and losing scheduled programs) that bothers me as these can't (easily) be worked around* and IMHO should have been given a higher priority and fixed already (or perhaps temporarily bodged somehow as per the disabling of delete in the v02 firmware). * Here I am specifically thinking about when the HDR has to be left alone for several days/weeks with noone around to monitor it. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:01.




