DS Forums

 
 

Foxsat-HDR 1080p support coming soon?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 19-01-2009, 16:27
wjharing
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Surrey
Posts: 79

Hi, I know there is no setting on the Foxsat-HDR to switch to 1080p mode yet, however when looking closely at the LCD, you can notice a 1080p mode indicator, next to the 1080i one.

Can we assume that in the near future, this device will be upgraded (firmware hopefully) to support 1080p as well?

It would be a welcomed bonus, as I now notice that some of the upscaled SD content (to 1080i), sometimes switches between a focused frame and somewhat blurry frame (or maybe sharp vs. less sharp).

Wouter.
wjharing is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 19-01-2009, 16:38
Flyer 10
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,556
No one broadcasts in 1080p so theres no point in supporting it.
Flyer 10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-2009, 16:40
mwardy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,919
I think it will be a very long time before this happens as it would take significant upgrades in the broadcasting chain.

The 1080p input is for blu ray or upscaled images from a domestic source.
mwardy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-2009, 16:46
wjharing
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Surrey
Posts: 79
No one broadcasts in 1080p so theres no point in supporting it.
I should have clarified indeed...

I realize broadcasting in 1080p is not likely to happen very soon, however playing back content in 1080p mode could have benefits from an upscaling perspective. (The PS3 upscaler is still one of the best in my views)

The question remains applicable, although slightly modified, why has Humax added an 1080p indicator on the LCD, and when will they plan using it (and for what)...

Wouter
wjharing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-2009, 16:53
Flyer 10
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,556
Its always good to be future proof, might as well have it in there even if there arent any immediate plans for any broadcaster to use it.

Also, it would be good if external content can be copied to it in the future.

I would highly doubt you will give a decisive answer on this though.
Flyer 10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-2009, 16:55
mwardy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,919
Sorry, I misunderstood which LCD you were referring to.

Its presence *is* intriguing--unless it just means they picked a suitable part which happened to have that display option on it. Hope not!
mwardy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-2009, 18:07
Nigel Goodwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,783
Its presence *is* intriguing--unless it just means they picked a suitable part which happened to have that display option on it. Hope not!
I would have thought that's almost certainly the case - it's a standard display they have used.

I would never have considered any other reason, and still wouldn't.
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-2009, 19:18
Automan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: South Coast, UK
Posts: 4,952
See http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s...31&postcount=3

Please note, the product potentially supports 1080p25 not 1080p50, also a broadcaster would have to be able to broadcast in the format for the device to handle it.

Bob
Automan.
Automan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-2009, 22:30
KDH
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 563
This is the chip in the HDR

http://www.broadcom.com/products/Cab...utions/BCM7403

......revealing its capabilties
KDH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-2009, 23:44
mwardy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,919
Phew! So it does look like it's all dressed up but has nowhere to go...
mwardy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-01-2009, 01:08
White-Knight
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,494
Pity it doesn't seem to make a great job of upscaling - my tv is visibly far better.

I wonder if a future firmware update will improve the quality?
White-Knight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-01-2009, 10:29
Nigel Goodwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,783
Pity it doesn't seem to make a great job of upscaling - my tv is visibly far better.

I wonder if a future firmware update will improve the quality?
Supposedly it's because it uses a low-cost scaler, so it's doubtful a software update could improve it?.

BTW, what make is your TV?.
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2009, 10:27
Nikodemus
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Southampton
Posts: 41
KDH, are you certain the chip you've quoted is the one in the HDR? The reason I ask is that on the web site says"It combines a data transport processor, high-definition AVC/MPEG-2/MPEG-4/DivX/VC-1 video decoder" Which means there's no reason that DivX support cannot be added so we can add our own movies to the DVR for playback. In other posts people have commented that there is no native support for DivX so impossible to add later.

If you read this Bob_Cat, perhaps you can shed some light?!

Cheers all

Nik
Nikodemus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2009, 11:24
KDH
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 563
KDH, are you certain the chip you've quoted is the one in the HDR? The reason I ask is that on the web site says"It combines a data transport processor, high-definition AVC/MPEG-2/MPEG-4/DivX/VC-1 video decoder" Which means there's no reason that DivX support cannot be added so we can add our own movies to the DVR for playback. In other posts people have commented that there is no native support for DivX so impossible to add later.

If you read this Bob_Cat, perhaps you can shed some light?!

Cheers all

Nik

Read it here

http://www.avforums.com/forums/frees...nder-hood.html


...may not be right?
KDH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2009, 12:58
Nikodemus
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Southampton
Posts: 41
Well, if the what's under the hood article is rght, there seems no sensible reason that the functionality for DivX playback cannot be added with a software update.
On reading through, this seems right as the BCM7403 is a Multiformat HD Digital Video/Audio SoC for Satellite, IP and Cable DVR STBs with Watch-and-Record DVR, and we certainly know the IP will be activated when iPlayer is ready to go live.

Come on Bob_Cat, give us some feedback on this, or get one of ur tech guys on the case.

Thanks again KDH

Nick
Nikodemus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2009, 14:18
nwhitfield
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London
Posts: 4,517
While the chip can decode it, I don't know whether or not simply buying the chip gets you a license to market your product as DivX capable - so there may be addtional cost involved in that, besides of course the development in the UI side of things, to actually get the avi files fed to the chip.

The iCord is based on the 7401, which is a very similar chip, but without the DivX decoding, as far as I can recall.

Nigel.
nwhitfield is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2009, 15:21
Nikodemus
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Southampton
Posts: 41
Good point Nigel, but to be fair, most companies have a universal DivX license, and market all their products accordingly. I cannot believe that this is a real issue, after all my DVD player plays DivX, and the codec for playback is free on the net for all Mac, PC Linux O/S's etc If there was a heavy cost involved, this wouldn't be the case, so I don't think this is an issue, but I may be wrong.

Regards

Nick
Nikodemus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2009, 20:36
Bob_Cat
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 1,302
All I will say is that DiVx would cost us money, and any cost must be carefully considered.

Bob
Bob_Cat is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2009, 20:56
Nikodemus
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Southampton
Posts: 41
Bob_Cat, as always we bow to your insider knowledge, non the less, this would be a great additional feature because there would be no need for the "hacking community" to then work tirelessly to crack the 3 file format currently used for archiving. We appreciate that cost must always be factored in, but if anyone from DivX is reading this, have a heart and make this happen!!! You guys at Humax have created a piece of kit that clearly has outstanding development potential. Just hope your development team can see the potential too. Thanks again for your input. Good to see that you take this community seriously enough to keep in touch.

Finally, any heads up on what's next

Nick
Nikodemus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2009, 22:45
Flyer 10
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,556
All I will say is that DiVx would cost us money, and any cost must be carefully considered.

Bob
x264 in an open source mkv container would be your friend then.
Flyer 10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2009, 09:44
Bob_Cat
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 1,302
H.264 in a TS container would be my preference, but there are wider issues.
Bob_Cat is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 26-01-2009, 21:07
zoltexuk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 13

All I will say is that DiVx would cost us money, and any cost must be carefully considered.

Bob
DIVX may cost money but you need have the toppings if you want to sell? What was the TOP requested item on the PS3 after launch. Even Sony eventually caved in to provide divx support and they are the world preachers of DRM (short of Apple) so if Sony saw it as a big + I cant see why Humax are even having to think of this one.

My second point - Humax are obviously trying to make this device a media hub, you can say no but then why the support for Photos, Music etc... Any £20 dvd player on the shelves now can play DIVX. Why can the Humax not play the most widely adopted format? you may as well remove MP3? In fact Yes remove MP3 and the costs you save you can put in DIVX, I think that will be more acceptable than nothing


PS Humax if you ever read this - PLEASE fix the EPG messing up the darn buffer.

Last edited by zoltexuk : 26-01-2009 at 21:10. Reason: Missed sentence
zoltexuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-01-2009, 23:03
marcdavis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 4,520
DIVX may cost money but you need have the toppings if you want to sell? What was the TOP requested item on the PS3 after launch. Even Sony eventually caved in to provide divx support and they are the world preachers of DRM (short of Apple) so if Sony saw it as a big + I cant see why Humax are even having to think of this one.
It looks as though they are (see post 18) but there is a cost element to it. I wonder if there is something else other than cost that prevents Divx support. Humax dropped the launch promise of divx for the icord-HD in Germany for some reason even though demand high and sales successful. So, I wonder if a potential technical or support issue has been identified.

The thing with Sony Playstation 3 is its in a different market. It has slightly different volumes. And it is having to play catch up to its major competitor Microsoft.


My second point - Humax are obviously trying to make this device a media hub, you can say no but then why the support for Photos, Music etc...
All the Set top box manufacturers that sell receivers with a USB port for displaying photos or music dont ever seem to push that aspect. None that come to mind. Why I am not sure; they are normally rather clunky or limited in implementation yes, but that shouldn't necesserily stop at least some manufacturers over selling the little extras that just happen to come free with the chipset like MP3 and jpeg.

Any £20 dvd player on the shelves now can play DIVX. Why can the Humax not play the most widely adopted format?
I think that it can but it comes down to cost which Humax will need to consider. If they were to produce this product in volumes like a DVD manufacturer making for many different customers and brands, selling in all EU countries and around the world, it could have been a no brainer.
marcdavis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2009, 07:46
zoltexuk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 13

The thing with Sony Playstation 3 is its in a different market. It has slightly different volumes. And it is having to play catch up to its major competitor Microsoft.
PS3 play catchup - Snigger Laugh..... I dont think so but thats for another forum. (unless you are on XBOX where you will need to pay for that online ability...

Re the Humax - I dont care just put DIVX and make everyone happy.
zoltexuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2009, 10:35
Nikodemus
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Southampton
Posts: 41
Looking at Bob_Cat's previous comments, having had a look at the spec, H.264 in a TS container would also be an acceptable alternative as from our point of view, it's fairly easy to find a suitable converter. The real issue is being able to load our own vids onto the device & play them at as high a quality as is possible. I hope that isn't too much to ask.

Nick
Nikodemus is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:43.