DS Forums

 
 

nomination giveaways?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-07-2001, 05:47
bb
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: In front of the computer
Posts: 297

When watching the nominations on E4 yesterday, it may have been possible to second guess who voted for who by watching where the cameras were focusing on the two live feeds.
Not including times when cameras moved to pick up conversations, the cameras focused as follows:

Brian in diary room - focused on Paul & Elizabeth
Dean - Paul & Josh
Elizabeth - Paul & Helen
Helen - Brian & Josh (but could have been Dean)
Josh - Brian & Helen
Paul - Brian & Josh

So nominations could be Brian (with 3), Josh (3), and Paul (3).
But if I am wrong with Helens vote, it will leave Paul versus Brian (or in other words, Me Me Me Me Me Me Me Brian versus 5th time unlucky Paul).
bb is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 10-07-2001, 09:00
Harlequin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London
Posts: 215
Damn! The only two people who really irritate me.

Get them both out!

[COLOR=purple]H.[/COLOR]
Harlequin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2001, 09:20
Mike2964050
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 291
Good work BB-oh if only -lets start the Get Brian out campaign now-spoilt brat-attention seeking-selfish-up his own a*** -careful got to stay politically correct
Mike2964050 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2001, 10:36
AxeVictim
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,644

Dean said in the diary room yesterday he would not be voting for Paul this week.Also said there were 2 people he would never vote for ( Brian & Betty ) i think .So only leaves Helen and Josh for Deans votes this week.
AxeVictim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2001, 10:39
Harlequin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London
Posts: 215
Stuff political correctness! I'm happy with plain old consideration and politeness[*] (although the latter isn't always deserved by particular individuals) .

(If you were implying that there's some strong correlation between homosexuality and anal sex, however, I've pointed out elsewhere that more heterosexuals are into buggery than homosexuals).

Are you sure that the second person Dean wouldn't nominate is Brian, AxeVictim? Also, ISTR that Dean said he probably wouldn't nominate Paul (or that he was thinking about not nominating him).

[COLOR=purple]H.[/COLOR]
[*] Two qualities that I noticed in Bubble, despite his being perhaps the least PC male in the house.
Harlequin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2001, 05:51
bb
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: In front of the computer
Posts: 297
Oh well, after seeing who really nominated who last night, it just goes to show how pants my original theory was.
Nice for Paul to get a break though for a week.
bb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2001, 06:33
Harlequin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London
Posts: 215
You only got three wrong out of twelve. I don't think a 75% success rate is to be sniffed at. Perhaps the cameras couldn't get a good angle on Helen .

Well done!

[COLOR=purple]H.[/COLOR]
Harlequin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2001, 10:23
Mike2964050
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 291
Harlequin -i hope i would never be so unimaginative as to suggest a correlation between buggery and homosexuality. Although I imagine some may have found the phrase applied to Brian humourous (does that make me and them homophobic?)
Up his own arse is a phrase meaning self-obsessed. Perhaps it comes from the idea of being an anal retentive -I don't know.
Any incidental image of someone who hasn't properly worked out their sexuality experimenting tentatively with a candle is nothing to do with me!
Mike2964050 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:01.