DS Forums

 
 

Sky feeling the heat?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-02-2009, 15:24
theShadowman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: St Albans
Posts: 282

What Sky depend on is that the average punter can't be bothered to spend hours on a 0871 line trying to cancel their sub and direct debit
You're telling me. I cancelled my subscription on January 2nd, it took half a morning and when I got the bill it was for nearly 4 quid - glad I did though - Humax is much better
theShadowman is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 02-02-2009, 16:49
SWIZZ?
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cambs
Posts: 874

You're telling me. I cancelled my subscription on January 2nd, it took half a morning and when I got the bill it was for nearly 4 quid - glad I did though - Humax is much better
I'd heard of long waits on 087 numbers so I
1 Told my bank to stop the Direct Debit.
2 Sent an email to Sky telling them so

No phone bill, no wasted time & no argument !
SWIZZ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 16:58
Andrue
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Brackley, UK
Posts: 16,657
Now the snow they forcasted has started, lets see how my Freesat handles it, better then Sky I hope
Why should it be any different? They both tune in the same frequencies, you know. Anything that knocks out part of the Sky service will knock out Freesat as well.

There might be minor differences in sensitivity amongst the electronics of the receiver but I doubt it makes much difference. When you watch BBC One your box tunes in exactly the same transmission as your neighbour does using Sky.
Andrue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 17:14
Nigel Goodwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,782
There might be minor differences in sensitivity amongst the electronics of the receiver but I doubt it makes much difference.
No difference worth mentioning - drop out due to snow is basically down to too little signal at the LNB, not at the input to the receiver.
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 18:19
nigelbb
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 834
I'd heard of long waits on 087 numbers so I
1 Told my bank to stop the Direct Debit.
2 Sent an email to Sky telling them so

No phone bill, no wasted time & no argument !
A Recorded Delivery letter would be a more foolproof method. Sky can easily deny receiving an email & may even be telling the truth as sending an email is no guarantee that the addressee will actually receive it.
nigelbb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 18:36
sadbiker
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 54
I cancelled my Sky.. Not because that HD Freesat is a killer service which it isn't compared to sky, simply because I couldn't justify the price I needed to pay to go SKY HD and to be honest had felt for a while I was throwing away good money for something I wasn't really utilising.

Went for the HDR simply because I knew I would miss SKY+ recording and wasn't going to pay £5 a month to sky to keep that. Plus I wanted to get the chance to watch the odd BBC HD viewing.

My feelings so far - Haven't missed SKY. HDR has been quite good and excellant replacement to the sky+ box. Just be glad to see more HD content to show off my LCD.

Do I think HDR is going to effect SKY, well er no as people will still pay SKY's prices if thats what they want. Yes the HDR will attract people like myself but we are a minority.
sadbiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 20:33
rjay60
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 70
Why should it be any different? They both tune in the same frequencies, you know. Anything that knocks out part of the Sky service will knock out Freesat as well.

There might be minor differences in sensitivity amongst the electronics of the receiver but I doubt it makes much difference. When you watch BBC One your box tunes in exactly the same transmission as your neighbour does using Sky.
Lol it was just a joke Once up on a time it only had to look like snowing or raining and people would moan that their Sky picture would drop out, as I said just a joke.

As for the cost; that is why I would never sub to Sky. I do not agree in having to pay to use something you have paid good money for.

I know a couple of Sky+ users who would love HD but object to having to pay Sky an extra £10 a month for the privilage of using it and are thinking about FSHD. When I got my Humax a friend of mine who has Sky+HD asked how much it cost. I said £299 + £149 for installation. He said not cheap then. I said how much did you pay for yours, £299? He said yes at least that. I said how long have you had it 2 years? He said about that if not a little longer. I said £539 so far then, not cheap aye? After explaining to him how I got to that figure he agreed what I paid wasn't too bad after all.
rjay60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 20:50
dazbear
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kent
Posts: 691
A Recorded Delivery letter would be a more foolproof method. Sky can easily deny receiving an email & may even be telling the truth as sending an email is no guarantee that the addressee will actually receive it.

Actually emails are legally binding contracts, far more than a phone call and even a letter.

ok - coming to the end of my Sky HD contract and to be honest all I ever watch HD wise is BBC HD and C4HD. The killer for me in terms of switching is GOLD and Paramount 1/2. Also the cost of the Freesat PVR is shocking, may just get out my old Toppy.

Just out of interest as I have the dish etc, would it just be a case of buying the box and swapping over?

Thanks

D
dazbear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 20:57
niall campbell
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Aberfeldy
Posts: 7,035
why not just cancel the HD part then?
niall campbell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 23:06
SWIZZ?
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cambs
Posts: 874
I posted,
I'd heard of long waits on 087 numbers so I
1 Told my bank to stop the Direct Debit.
2 Sent an email to Sky telling them so

No phone bill, no wasted time & no argument !

A Recorded Delivery letter would be a more foolproof method. Sky can easily deny receiving an email & may even be telling the truth as sending an email is no guarantee that the addressee will actually receive it.
Dazbear's response---
Actually emails are legally binding contracts, far more than a phone call and even a letter.

---This can be confirmed by anyone who has been sacked for, in an email, describing his/her boss as something I could not repeat here.

Some ways of ensuring proof are
1---use web-based email e.g. Hotmail, Gmail etc. proves sending easily & lack of a "could not deliver" shows arrival.
2---Send as a "reply" to an earlier email.
3---Send to multiple Sky recipients ( remember Oscar Wild's "losing one parent is unfortunate losing 2 smacks of carelessness!)
4---provoke a response! If I say how I did it, then it wouldn't work for you !!

SWIZZ?
SWIZZ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 23:16
jon41
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,343
Email proof can easily be done, use www.readnotify.com - I do for every email I send. it tells you the time, date, IP and headers of the machine it was opened on and requires no input from the recipaint.
jon41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 00:09
BKM
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,288
Email proof can easily be done, use www.readnotify.com - I do for every email I send. it tells you the time, date, IP and headers of the machine it was opened on and requires no input from the recipaint.
It's still nowhere near proof! Any Linux mailer could easily avoid this.
BKM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 01:19
performingmonk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 18,064
Most people who I know who have Sky seem to have it just to seem 'cool' or just because they CAN have it. They're hardly at home to watch it, and when they do it's never anything that you'd consider worth the £50 odd quid. Only Sky Sports is worth it, and only then if you watch it a lot.
performingmonk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 08:33
Bob_Cat
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 1,302
If you wanted to take them to court over an email you could, because like all corporates BSkyB is obliged to record and store all emails arriving and leaving.

Bob
Bob_Cat is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 14:29
Tern
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,324
No.

You are bigging up Freesat.

Just look at what Freesat is supposed to provide.
Mario, I'm sure we can help you out here as you seem to have a bit of a problem.

Sky want as many customers as possible for obvious commerical reasons.

Many people now are giving up Sky (or not subscribing in the first place) because they realise that they do the vast majority of their viewing on the channels that are available on Freesat (even more do so because they can get what they want on Freeview).

If you can just tell us which aspect of 'competition' you are having trouble with I'm sure someone will be able to explain it to you.
Tern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 14:37
BKM
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,288
Many people now are giving up Sky (or not subscribing in the first place) because they realise that they do the vast majority of their viewing on the channels that are available on Freesat (even more do so because they can get what they want on Freeview).
That's total wishful thinking! Sky are doing extremely well at the minute and getting masses of new subscribers - especially for HD (all from their report last week). They are well ahead of their target to get 10 million households by 2010!
BKM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 14:48
Tern
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,324
That's total wishful thinking!
ROFLMAO!

'Total' wishful thinking? (Whatever that means ).

I'm afraid you are a little out of touch with reality. I was a Sky subscriber for many years before Freesat came along and I 'gave them the finger'. I know a fair few other people who have done the same. No matter how much it upsets you, Sky ARE being affected by competition form Freeview and Freesat. Sorry, that's just the way it is.
Tern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 15:34
Nigel Goodwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,782
I'm afraid you are a little out of touch with reality. I was a Sky subscriber for many years before Freesat came along and I 'gave them the finger'. I know a fair few other people who have done the same. No matter how much it upsets you, Sky ARE being affected by competition form Freeview and Freesat. Sorry, that's just the way it is.
Hardly a very accurate sample, you and a few friends have acancelled - the facts are simple, more people are subscribing than are cancelling - numbers are increasing.

Neither Freeview nor Freesat are competitors, as Sky is a subscription service, and they aren't - Sky's only real competitor is VM. But even counting VM, the ONLY place to get HD is Sky HD, all other HD offerings are too pitiful to be counted.
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 16:07
Blueberryman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 65
Ask the man in the street "Have you heard of Freesat ?" The reply is usually "No".

I've told several people that I have Freesat, and they mostly say "What's that ?"

The country generally thinks that Satellite = Sky, and that's the way it is.

Apart from the odd page in Radio Times, I can't remember seeing any adverts for FS.

With DSO in progress now, surely this is the best time to PUSH, PUSH, PUSH ?
Blueberryman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 16:12
jzee
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,460
Apart from the odd page in Radio Times, I can't remember seeing any adverts for FS.
Actually I've seen plenty of ads in the Times/Sunday Times, none on TV though that I can remember.
jzee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 16:26
Nigel Goodwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,782
Actually I've seen plenty of ads in the Times/Sunday Times, none on TV though that I can remember.
As you can't get the boxes, what would be the point in advertising?.
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 17:09
Tern
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,324
Neither Freeview nor Freesat are competitors
There seem to be quite a few people here who either do not understand what competition is or are in denial about the competition Sky face from various sources.

As long and anyone might consider Sky but ultimately reject it in favour of another source, that source is competition for Sky. That is such a simple concept a child of five should be able to understand it.

Apart from the odd page in Radio Times, I can't remember seeing any adverts for FS
Originally Posted by Nigel Goodwin
As you can't get the boxes, what would be the point in advertising?.
Not sure which planet you are living on, Nigel, but here on Earth standard Freesat boxes are in plentiful supply.
Tern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 17:14
Nigel Goodwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,782
Not sure which planet you are living on, Nigel, but here on Earth standard Freesat boxes are in plentiful supply.
I'm living on the planet where SD Freesat boxes aren't available (and haven't been for many weeks), and the one where Alba are designing a new one rather than having any more of the old ones manufactured.

There are small numbers of SD boxes left in the shops, but once stocks have gone there are no more until a new model is released.

As for the Freesat PVR, that's never even reached 'being available' at all yet

So I don't know where you're imagining a 'plentiful supply' from?.
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 17:40
Tern
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,324
I'm living on the planet where SD Freesat boxes aren't available (and haven't been for many weeks),
OK, so not Earth then as I've seen them in Argos this weekend.

Plus, a little look at their website: Shows this (Just one example of boxes they have available).

Or do you have a non-standard definition of 'available' as you do for 'competition'?
Tern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 18:58
jzee
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,460
Actually I've seen plenty of ads in the Times/Sunday Times, none on TV though that I can remember.
Actually to correct myself I think there was a Panasonic TV ad for the Freesat TVs, though that is not specifically a Freesat ad. Presumably cost of TV advertising is what is holding them back, but you'd think Freesat, Alba, Humax and Panasonic might have been able to combine forces to afford it.
jzee is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:09.