• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • Past Reality Shows
  • Dancing On Ice: All Stars
Ray's skating: flashy but overrated. Will he peak too soon?
<<
<
4 of 6
>>
>
Veri
02-02-2009
Originally Posted by reclinewithme:
“I don't get the Ray becoming boring because he's already so good thing. Does that make the professional skaters boring to watch, or mean they have "nowhere else to go"? Doesn't matter what point he started out at, Ray is learning, just like everyone else.”

Professional skaters can be boring to watch.

Originally Posted by tabithakitten:
“Okay I was a bit flippant before. However, all these "Ray is so good where on earth can he go" comments don't make sense.

I think anyone who has ever watched any proper skating (that's "proper" in the technical sense ) knows that Ray still has a fair way to go before he can rival even the more mediocre skaters in the competitive world.

Therefore, even a celeb who starts out (relatively) brilliantly still should have one hell of a journey in front of them if they're really that good.

Look at it this way. There's a fantastically gifted sprinter out there that has never tried his/her luck over 100m, let alone put on proper kit or worn running spikes.

I reckon that sprinter would still be able to make incredible progress (and not just over a couple of races) once they'd received coaching.”

But, using your analogy, Ray's already put on proper kit, and running spikes, and received coaching. He's already past that period of rapid progress.

Suppose Ray were enough better that he didn't have that little mess up he had tonight. Would that make his performance a better one? Yes. Would it make his performance much more interesting? No. Or suppose he became able to move faster over the ice (which one of the judges suggested as a goal). Would that make his routines better and more difficult? Of course. Much more interesting? No, not really.

There are more things he can learn, and some of them might be very impressive, but most likely he's going to stay at roughly the level he's at now.
surfie
02-02-2009
The thing for me though is this. Had the selection of this years contestants been better would Ray now be under more more pressure to perform better.

Judging by the majority of the contestants I feel this is the weakest line up they have ever had on Dancing on Ice, including Michael Underwood, whom if you discount being a reserve in series two was still bad given all the training he has had. And I suspect the line up they have has been chosen to boost the likes of Ray and Jessica's chances of getting to the final because they are so poor.
National Park
02-02-2009
Originally Posted by Veri:
“flashy but overrated”

I don't think Ray is either flashy nor overrated.

He is exceptionally good and his performances are more understated than flashy.

The only contestant in any of the series whose skating I would describe as flashy but overrated is Chris Fountain.

Originally Posted by kaycee:
“I think that without doubt Ray is better than any of the others at this stage; with Jessica the one with the most potential (strange, they are also the 2 with most experience)!!”

No, actually Michael is the most experienced.

Having trained for the series this year, last year and the year before.

Originally Posted by janymac:
“What the profrssionals are on about is Ray's ability to interpret the music and to effortlessly present it - it less about stunning moves and lifts. He has what Andrew Llyodd Webber would call the "ability to to tell the story", and making a performance believable, which is something Jessica was not really doing, even though she was technically skating well.”

I don't agree and have never agreed with this. In all honesty, the vast majority of the studio audience are bemused every time the judges make this criticism of her. I think they basically have to criticise her for something and there isn't really anything else to criticise her for.

Jessica has a genuine fear of falling and seriously hurting herself and it is holding her back from actually enjoying what she's doing. Ray does not or at least does not appear to have this fear.

Originally Posted by Kopite1763:
“Yes, Ray is a very good skater but......... I thought the whole point of the show was for celebrities who have never skated before, learn to do so and compete in an even contest.
Quite clearly Ray has skated before, as has Jessica. How is this a fair contest? How can the likes of Todd, who has clearly never put skates on before, be expected to compete with the likes of Ray & Jessica?
All the celebrities should be of the same standard when they start so at least it's a fair competition!”

Ray is a dancer (hence why he will never be allowed to enter SCD) but there is a huge difference between dancing on level, dry ground and on ice. Ray has roller bladed which is a totally different skill to ice skating (it's like comparing tennis to squash or badminton or sprinting to long distance running).

Jessica trained for a show that involved just one performance. Hardly prolonged, intensive training. David Seaman trained for and won the same show. Why was the same fuss not made about him when he entered DOI a couple of years ago? Despite the fact that he clearly had experience of basic skating even before then as a result of his ice hockey days. Likewise, Greg Rusedski.

John Barrowman is a dancer with prior experience of skating. Why was his right to participate in the series not questioned?

Chris Fountain made no secret of the fact that he had skated regularly with his friends since childhood? Why was he not deemed to have too much experience for the show?

All the above (with the exception od Chris), together with Michael Underwood who has trained for three series, only prove that you've either got it or you haven't.

Why is it only Ray and Jessica who are deemed to be "too experienced" for the show? Could it be because other contestants' supporters know that they have little chance against either of them?
The Swampster
02-02-2009
I agree. He has a natural elegance on the ice that is lovely to watch. It was a real shame about the stumble yesterday.
Pinkvelvet
02-02-2009
Originally Posted by SliverOfDiamond:
“I suspect that Ray is one of those very very talented people who would shine in no matter what field they were interested in. He has dance training, and already roller bladed, so he had the skills and balance in place, he only has to transfer those skills to the ice. He is also fearless.

If you are going to ban everyone with as much previous ice skating experience as he has, I suspect you wouldn't have any celebrities at all out there. Where do you stop? Exclude anyone who has ever put a pair of skates on for whatever reason? Exclude all dancers? Exclude anyone young and athletic for already being fit? Exclude everyone who seems to have a degree of recklessness for their own safety?

There's not many people left is there, and they wouldn't be worth watching anyway.”

Great Post

I completely agree, Ray would shine at most things to do with performing, seems he was simply born to do so. It's such a shame that someone so talented gets criticised fo rnatural ability.
water_carrier
02-02-2009
I thought Ray was very good yesterday. I must say I prefer his skating to his singing. The only criticism I would give would be that T&D or whoever choreographs his routines should not try to make it overly complicated. I think that is why he stumbled yesterday. I think the routine was very complicated. He has no immediate competition, Jessica, although very good, is not on the same level. Therefore wouldn't it be better to do a simpler routine (with perhaps a few intricate moves) than to do an overly complicated routine that will be too much for him?
While I was watching him I thought, the only way he'll be out of this competition is if he does something wrong, falls down or something because I cannot see anyone skating better than him. I think they should simplify his routine a bit.
GillT07
02-02-2009
Originally Posted by tabithakitten:
“I think anyone who has ever watched any proper skating (that's "proper" in the technical sense ) knows that Ray still has a fair way to go before he can rival even the more mediocre skaters in the competitive world.”

True.
I suspect that whatever he does over the next few weeks, he won't get higher than a 5. They'll save the 6s for the semi final/final (assuming he does get that far.)

I was surprised that Jason gave him a 4 last night, but that was good - shows that he's not always guaranteed top marks.
Rayforever
02-02-2009
Originally Posted by water_carrier:
“I thought Ray was very good yesterday. I must say I prefer his skating to his singing. The only criticism I would give would be that T&D or whoever choreographs his routines should not try to make it overly complicated. I think that is why he stumbled yesterday. I think the routine was very complicated. He has no immediate competition, Jessica, although very good, is not on the same level. Therefore wouldn't it be better to do a simpler routine (with perhaps a few intricate moves) than to do an overly complicated routine that will be too much for him?
While I was watching him I thought, the only way he'll be out of this competition is if he does something wrong, falls down or something because I cannot see anyone skating better than him. I think they should simplify his routine a bit.”

it's funny because the bit he trippd on he got fine all week watch the mid week clip and he is perfect at it.
His childhood sweet heart sold a story on him yesterday so i think maybe that could have been playing on his mind which affected him a tiny bit.

I thought he was good and was not the only one to trip or slip last night but because he is use to perfection it was noticed more.

I think he will be back to normal happy Ray next week
GillT07
02-02-2009
Originally Posted by water_carrier:
“I thought Ray was very good yesterday. I must say I prefer his skating to his singing. The only criticism I would give would be that T&D or whoever choreographs his routines should not try to make it overly complicated. I think that is why he stumbled yesterday. I think the routine was very complicated.”

I think they wanted to challenge him and see what he was able to do.

I think Ray has no problem with speed; maybe he'd find a slower routine more of a challenge. I wonder if they'd let him try Bolero?
Passoa
02-02-2009
Ray has a natural flair and guts on the ice which NONE of the others have.

He is given much much much harder routines than any of the others yet still outscores them. I like her, but he deserved much more than a 0.5 more than Coleen.

He's actually a very good skater by the looks of it.
Psychosis
02-02-2009
Originally Posted by National Park:
“Why is it only Ray and Jessica who are deemed to be "too experienced" for the show? Could it be because other contestants' supporters know that they have little chance against either of them?”

It seems to me that past experience only counts if you're talented. If you had three years of training (a la Michael) and still aren't very good, it doesn't count. You only get it in the neck if you have natural aptitude to pick it up.

Originally Posted by surfie:
“The thing for me though is this. Had the selection of this years contestants been better would Ray now be under more more pressure to perform better.

Judging by the majority of the contestants I feel this is the weakest line up they have ever had on Dancing on Ice, including Michael Underwood, whom if you discount being a reserve in series two was still bad given all the training he has had. And I suspect the line up they have has been chosen to boost the likes of Ray and Jessica's chances of getting to the final because they are so poor.”

Are you trying to say that Ray and Jessica are "so poor" and need help to get to the final? Or is your "so poor" directed to the other contestants?
Veri
02-02-2009
Originally Posted by National Park:
“I don't think Ray is either flashy nor overrated.

He is exceptionally good and his performances are more understated than flashy.”



There are flashier moves in Ray's routines than in any of the others, apart from a few of the lifts that a couple of the women do with their professional partners.

(I agree with you about Jessica, btw.)

Quote:
“Ray is a dancer (hence why he will never be allowed to enter SCD) but there is a huge difference between dancing on level, dry ground and on ice. Ray has roller bladed which is a totally different skill to ice skating (it's like comparing tennis to squash or badminton or sprinting to long distance running).”

Rollerblading is not totally different, though. I encountered them in the other direction (ie, skating 1st), but either way, some things do carry over.

Ray's dance experience is very evident in all of his skating performances. In the past, the point that dance experience helps has been made repeatedly (often to counter claims that someone's skating experience gives them an unfair advantage).

However, I agree that Ray's experience shouldn't bar him from participating in the show.

There's certainly no clear line that he alone has crossed.

Still, I think it creates problems for the show to have someone in it who is so much better than the others. For one thing, it removes a lot of interest and excitement from the competition to know who's going to win if from day 1. (And that interest and excitement will have already been lost even if Ray somehow doesn't win.)
Veri
02-02-2009
Originally Posted by National Park:
“...

All the above (with the exception od Chris), together with Michael Underwood who has trained for three series, only prove that you've either got it or you haven't.

...”

Both training and natural ability are involved. The idea that it's all down to talent would mean that no amount of training, of any sort, should be a bar. Even professional figure skaters could enter the show and be defended on the grounds that "you've either got it or you haven't" and look how little training helped Michael and Greg.
National Park
02-02-2009
Originally Posted by Veri:
“Both training and natural ability are involved. The idea that it's all down to talent would mean that no amount of training, of any sort, should be a bar. Even professional figure skaters could enter the show and be defended on the grounds that "you've either got it or you haven't" and look how little training helped Michael and Greg.”

All the training in the world, in anything, is not going to bring the average person up to the same standard as someone who has a natural aptitude for it.

Some people take longer to discover what they can and can't do (usually to do with confidence) but most people will just never reach the same level because they simply can't.
BuddyBontheNet
02-02-2009
Originally Posted by surfie:
“The thing for me though is this. Had the selection of this years contestants been better would Ray now be under more more pressure to perform better.

Judging by the majority of the contestants I feel this is the weakest line up they have ever had on Dancing on Ice, including Michael Underwood, whom if you discount being a reserve in series two was still bad given all the training he has had. And I suspect the line up they have has been chosen to boost the likes of Ray and Jessica's chances of getting to the final because they are so poor.”

How much better do you need him to be???? I think Ray puts plenty of pressure on himself and would be trying to make sure he doesn't let his partner and T&D down.

I don't understand why you think the line up was chosen to get Ray and Jessica to the final?
Sallyforth
02-02-2009
I must admit I was a bit cynical about Ray's expressions of concern in the VT before his performance. I also failed to see any real increase in difficulty in the routine for him last night compared to last week (although admittedly I am no expert). So I was a bit surprised when he put in a less than perfect performance and am a bit confused as to why.
BuddyBontheNet
02-02-2009
Originally Posted by National Park:
“All the training in the world, in anything, is not going to bring the average person up to the same standard as someone who has a natural aptitude for it.

Some people take longer to discover what they can and can't do (usually to do with confidence) but most people will just never reach the same level because they simply can't.”

I agree 100% - that's life!

I do think there is a problem with Ray's routines though, because although we can all tell a badly skated routine from a well skated routine, we can't always tell what makes the choreography more complex than the other skaters are skating. The judges refer to it, but is not obvious to the general public.
Veri
02-02-2009
Originally Posted by National Park:
“All the training in the world, in anything, is not going to bring the average person up to the same standard as someone who has a natural aptitude for it.”

it's not clear that that's true. Indeed, it's false in many cases if the person with natural aptitude hasn't had much (or any) training. But even if it were true, it would not invalidate my point.

Quote:
“Some people take longer to discover what they can and can't do (usually to do with confidence) but most people will just never reach the same level because they simply can't.”

That's probably right, but it also does not invalidate my point.
petertard
02-02-2009
Ray is great but the choreography did not suit him - and this was a bit of a reality check - but back to exceptional next week with more suitable moves, playing to his gracefulness.
Lorelei Lee
02-02-2009
For once Jason made a decent point by saying the routine wasn't really suited to Ray's style, and Ray whole-heartedly agreed with him when given the chance to speak about his performance.

Nonetheless, he made a creditable job of a routine that looked pretty tricky to keep to the music and didn't make mistakes any worse than some of the others, despite the complexity of his routine being greater than Donal, Todd, Michael, Melinda or anyone else who made a mistake first time through.

Plus, the whole episode served to show that Ray is his own worst critic and will be keen to keep improving, which I think's the key to him remaining top of the pile and avoiding Austin Healey/John Barrowman 'coasting' syndrome.
ibeca
02-02-2009
Originally Posted by Lorelei Lee:
“I think's the key to him remaining top of the pile and avoiding Austin Healey/John Barrowman 'coasting' syndrome. ”

I don't think either of them coasted. John just wasn't as good as he and his fans thought he was and when he found himself in the bottom two, he and his fans thought the judges would save him due to his God-given right. Austin was unlucky to find himself in the bottom two (at a stage in the competition where there should no longer be a bottom two) against the judges's and the Beeb's chosen one.
The Swampster
02-02-2009
Who was the Beeb's "chosen one" - and why on earth would they have a "chosen one"?
Of all the reality show cliches (and there are many), surely this has to be the most infantile?
minxymoo
02-02-2009
i dont agree Ray will peak too soon and hes definitely not ovverated,the judges were falling over themselves to praise Zoe when Ray is clearly head and shoulders above the rest...even on a (for him)bad week.
One stumble does not mean he wont continue to improve.
I believe he will.ive never seen anyone skate so well outside of their comfort zone,it would be an absolute travesty if he didnt win.
Psychosis
02-02-2009
Originally Posted by ibeca:
“I don't think either of them coasted. John just wasn't as good as he and his fans thought he was and when he found himself in the bottom two, he and his fans thought the judges would save him due to his God-given right. Austin was unlucky to find himself in the bottom two (at a stage in the competition where there should no longer be a bottom two) against the judges's and the Beeb's chosen one.”

Austin was unlucky to find himself in the bottom two against a better dancer
Merity
02-02-2009
Shame about Ray's stumble in an otherwise great routine.

But it just goes to show that he is as much a learner as anyone else when it comes to "dancing on ice" and has to work hard all week to try and get all the moves right.

He's very young - and it's a big pressure to cope with everything and try to keep bringing out great routines every week.

He is totally fabulous to watch....

I know it's probably unfair on some - but I love to see good skating and the better the contestants are the more enjoyable it is to watch.
<<
<
4 of 6
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map