Originally Posted by Veri:
“Perhaps we're talking about different things. There's portraying character and emption (which seems to be what you're talking about, given how your post is worded), and then there's portraying a specific character / type of character / role (the gaucho or whatever), which is what I had in mind.
I don't think the character (in that sense) is as big a part of the dance as they made out then, or that John was so far off. He portrayed character and emotion, but it wasn't quite the "right" character for that dance.”
Morning All
ok got to comment on this issue as whilst I'm a bit of novice on the old DOI front, I do know about dance.
In Ballroom Tango the character is supposed to actually 'provide' the emotion of the dance. They are inextricably linked.
Sorry it's late and I can't remember who said what

so please forgive me.
Yes, John was actually a pretty competant ballroom dancer, but unfortunately he was unable to convey the gravitas in his tango which is why he was marked down. His facial expression was virtually the same throughout the competition no matter what he was performing, and that clearly shows his lack of characterisation.
The impact of the tango is in the definition of the shapes created by angular lines - think of the two dancers like a tree, glued from the hip down and arching away from each other from the hip up, and definitely no grinning ( incidently JS not the only one who got marked down for lack of characterisation - seem to remember Christine did too as well as her floppy core lol )
anyhow hope that helps
peace out