Forums
 

Are Twitter sponsoring BBC radio or what?


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-02-2009, 15:52   #1
darls3000
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 917
Are Twitter sponsoring BBC radio or what?

Apologies firstly if this thread exists but I searched and couldn't find it.

Can anyone tell me why the BBC radio DJ's have gone bananas for Twitter suddenly - 2 years after it launched? Richard bacon has turned the last 3 weeks of his show into an extended advert for Twitter and it's spread to others on Five Live and now Radio One and even when he;e on TV with Something for the Weekend.

If this kind of thing went on at a commercial station, money would have had to change hands so can anyone explain what's going on. I am so sick of it, I miss the way his show used to be without the constant Twitter this Twitter that stuff.
darls3000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 07-02-2009, 16:54   #2
Matt-08
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Services: Virgin Media VIP Package - 2 V+
Posts: 6,258
I was listening to Kiss the other day, and Jez never stopped mentioning it either.

Popularity just seems to have jumped recently, what with Philip Schofield and his "That's my Hedge" nonsense.
Matt-08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 17:20   #3
Imus
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 432
I did notice that, too. I signed up to it yesterday. I can't see the point.

12.09pm 'I've just boiled the kettle.'

12.11pm 'I'm stirring my coffee'

12.15pm 'I'm rinsing the mug'

12.19pm 'I'm scraping snow off my car'

Sweet Jesus, does the world need this nonsense?
Imus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 17:32   #4
mj_32510
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Brighton
Services: Vigin Media-TV , Phone & Broadband, DAB, Xbox 360, Wii
Posts: 793
It was the same with facebook and myspace, they will get bored of it in a few weeks
mj_32510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 17:42   #5
R300
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Scunthorpe
Services: Virgin TV and 10mb Broadband also Virgin phone
Posts: 2,325
I did get a pit peeved with the amount of airtime that Richard Bacon was giving over to the subject. Seemed that he had not long been part of it and then couldn't shut up about it for the rest of the week.

Same for Simon Mayo yesterday. Started with a few followers and then by the end of the show was mentioning the followers were now in the hundreds. Once again Dotun on UAN was also going on about it for the football phone in.
R300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2009, 00:27   #6
wns_195
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Dewsbury, England
Services: FM, AM, longwave, shortwave, DAB, freeview, online
Posts: 5,094
The BBC just likes jumping on bandwagons. First it was blogging, then Facebook, now Twitter. It’s as if they’re paranoid that they’ll be out of touch with their audience if they don’t sign up to what they think is the latest craze.

There’s another reason:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditor...ching_out.html

The BBC wants to be aware of opinions that are being expressed elsewhere on the internet, and interact with people who don’t interact on the BBC website by posting comments. By using Twitter, the BBC can engage with people on other platforms.

Of course Twitter and Facebook have competitors, and the BBC is certainly giving those two websites more publicity than their rivals. In my opinion that is unfair, and as a public service broadcaster that doesn’t sell advertising, the BBC shouldn’t be endorsing specific companies. They wouldn’t behave in this manner towards offline companies such as supermarkets, furniture stores, etc.
wns_195 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2009, 00:42   #7
mikw
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,943
The presenters are just moving with the times and representing social trends, nothing more.

No-one has said "plug Twitter and Facebook".
mikw is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2009, 12:44   #8
Toxteth O'Grady
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,250
Quote:
Originally Posted by wns_195 View Post
Of course Twitter and Facebook have competitors, and the BBC is certainly giving those two websites more publicity than their rivals. In my opinion that is unfair
But then how many times have you heard any media outlet mention:

An auction site that's not Ebay
A search engine that's not Google
An MP3 player that's not an Apple
A PVR that's not Sky+
... or going back 20 years: A portable cassette player that's not a Sony Walkman
Toxteth O'Grady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2009, 12:55   #9
djgeeza
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,751
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toxteth O'Grady View Post
But then how many times have you heard any media outlet mention:

An auction site that's not Ebay
A search engine that's not Google
An MP3 player that's not an Apple
A PVR that's not Sky+
... or going back 20 years: A portable cassette player that's not a Sony Walkman
You could even take this further;
A vacuum cleaner that's not Hoover
djgeeza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2009, 14:13   #10
mbessex
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,169
Quote:
Originally Posted by djgeeza View Post
You could even take this further;
A vacuum cleaner that's not Hoover
Actually academically its a dry suction cleaner.
mbessex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2009, 16:43   #11
wns_195
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Dewsbury, England
Services: FM, AM, longwave, shortwave, DAB, freeview, online
Posts: 5,094
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toxteth O'Grady View Post
But then how many times have you heard any media outlet mention:

An auction site that's not Ebay
A search engine that's not Google
An MP3 player that's not an Apple
A PVR that's not Sky+
... or going back 20 years: A portable cassette player that's not a Sony Walkman
Not as often as I hear and read mentions of Twitter and Facebook on the BBC.
wns_195 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2009, 09:21   #12
darls3000
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 917
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikw View Post
The presenters are just moving with the times and representing social trends, nothing more.

No-one has said "plug Twitter and Facebook".
But that's my point, they aren't moving with the times as twitter was around 2 years ago and very popular when it first launched (at least that was when I used to do it for all of 10 minutes) so I am baffled at the sudden popularity. A bit like them going crazy for Friends Reunited now after it's been long dead and buried. That was why I was suspicious.
darls3000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2009, 09:44   #13
The Phazer
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,815
Quote:
Originally Posted by darls3000 View Post
But that's my point, they aren't moving with the times as twitter was around 2 years ago and very popular when it first launched (at least that was when I used to do it for all of 10 minutes) so I am baffled at the sudden popularity. A bit like them going crazy for Friends Reunited now after it's been long dead and buried. That was why I was suspicious.
It's certainly been now it's moved into the mainstream - Twitter's UK takeup went up over 4000% after Philip Schofield and Jonathan Ross signed up in a week.

To pretend that things don't take time to reach a critical mass is silly.

Phazer
The Phazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2009, 19:30   #14
katrinap
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,524
No need for the OP to be suspicious, this is just a reflection of what's going on in the world today. The only difference is a few shows on the BBC have got on board a bit quicker than normal. Online social networking is now woven into society, and I expect to see that reflected more and more in the media. It's already started, I just think the BBC are going quicker than the rest on this one.

Of course, it's cool and fashionable at the moment to be cynical about the BBC, but that's largely irrelevant, the moaners will move onto something else when the media lead them there. In the meantime, I'm quite enjoying the novelty of the BBC being ahead of the curve for once
katrinap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 10:53   #15
Radio Vet
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: England
Posts: 746
Well worth reading what Gillian Reynolds had to say about Twitter and the BBC in the Daily Telegraph this week....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/t...-the-news.html
Radio Vet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 11:04   #16
mfr
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Inverness
Services: Grampian TV; Freeview; ADSL Broadband
Posts: 2,385
Quote:
Originally Posted by darls3000 View Post
A bit like them going crazy for Friends Reunited now after it's been long dead and buried. That was why I was suspicious.
It's nothing like that at all. Twitter has just become mass market - of course it has been around for years, and I was an early adopter, but the actual number of users was tiny.

Twitter is an amazing tool for an audience to connect directly with presenters. It's not always banal - try reading Stephen Fry. In the past SMS was largely one way, and one-to-one. Chat rooms never gained much popularity and were impossible to use with thousands of users.

Of course there are rivals, but it doesn't make much sense for the BBC to spread itself thinly when those rivals have a tiny fraction of the users. In any case, it appears to be the personal choice of presenters, both on the BBC and commercially.

Twitter has become the leader, in the same way as Flash was the obvious choice for iPlayer (why not Silverlight? Should they support both?).

I spoke to JackFM in Oxfordshire the other day - they're loving the contact with listeners!
mfr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 11:07   #17
mfr
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Inverness
Services: Grampian TV; Freeview; ADSL Broadband
Posts: 2,385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radio Vet View Post
Well worth reading what Gillian Reynolds had to say about Twitter and the BBC in the Daily Telegraph this week....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/t...-the-news.html
Interesting take, but I don't see why in-depth reporting, entertaining short comments, listener feedback and a genuine two way conversation can't co-exist.
mfr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 13:56   #18
Radio Vet
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: England
Posts: 746
I think that's Gillian's point mfr - they can exist side by side, but let's have a better balance
Radio Vet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 14:58   #19
alanwarwic
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Services: Citizen Smith TV
Posts: 19,814
It is for Twits who Witter.

Decode that to 'Twits who make us suffer' for the radio presenters.
alanwarwic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2009, 20:13   #20
TelevisionUser
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Storbritannia
Services: DAB digital radio, WiFi radio, Freesat, Freeview & Spotify
Posts: 16,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by darls3000 View Post
Apologies firstly if this thread exists but I searched and couldn't find it.

Can anyone tell me why the BBC radio DJ's have gone bananas for Twitter suddenly - 2 years after it launched? Richard bacon has turned the last 3 weeks of his show into an extended advert for Twitter and it's spread to others on Five Live and now Radio One and even when he;e on TV with Something for the Weekend.
Yes, darls3000, I noticed that as well. There are constant references to Twitter. Maybe he's just recently joined or something and it's new to him so he keeps mentioning it.

Like you said, he also goes on about it on Something for the Weekend on BBC2 on Sunday morning. There's Simon Rimmer demonstrating some new cod frying technique or something meanwhile Richard is talking about...Twitter! Still, I guess it makes a change because football usually gets a mention or two when Tim Lovejoy was presenting the programme.

As for the rest of us who don't use Twitter...
TelevisionUser is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2011, 06:02   #21
rmorrison100
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: FL
Posts: 2
What happen to the two of them now? Any updates?
rmorrison100 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2011, 07:40   #22
occy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sussex
Posts: 18,145
Sky & ITV News Presenters do Tweat too. They all do it.
occy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2011, 12:31   #23
Gordon Sparks
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Plymouth
Posts: 33
Everyone's at it. It's a disgrace!

Shouldn't be allowed.

www.twitter.com/SparksyOnRadio
Gordon Sparks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2011, 17:02   #24
Vectorsum
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Uist, Western Isles
Services: Sony XDR-S1, Pure One Flow, Freesat Radio and a cherished Sony 2001D
Posts: 272
Hmm...

"...Twitter has become part of “citizen journalism”, the instant relaying of fact."

This would be true if by "citizen journalism" she actually meant "useless generation of data" and "fact" was a typo and should have been "rather pointless opinion" instead.

It's probably a sign of the onset of Victor Meldrew syndrome that I'd rather be accosted with a red hot poker that engage in any of the social drivel sites, but at least Twitter has received the ultimate accolade of a rant from inside der Bunker.
Vectorsum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-05-2011, 21:07   #25
rmorrison100
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: FL
Posts: 2
I see. I will follow them on Twitter now to get updated. Thanks again!



_________________________
Rascall
How Women Attract Men and How to Talk to Girls blog reader.
rmorrison100 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:23.