I caught the end of today's show and saw Sharron Davies on as a guest... 
Definitely a case of Beauty & the Beast on this show! 
Definitely a case of Beauty & the Beast on this show!
Countdown - so much better these days!
42 of 165
Originally Posted by Tejas:
“I caught the end of today's show and saw Sharron Davies on as a guest... Definitely a case of Beauty & the Beast on this show! ”
“I caught the end of today's show and saw Sharron Davies on as a guest...
Definitely a case of Beauty & the Beast on this show! ”
Well who is the beauty ?? I will vote for Jeff !!
Originally Posted by Gulftastic:
“I agree. Never seen the appeal of Ms Davies.”
“I agree. Never seen the appeal of Ms Davies.”
She's got a couple of good points.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_8M4A38LyBB...Cf0/s400/4.jpg
It's a tad disappointing how Sharron doesn't seem to feel confident enough to deliver the usual end-of-part-one piece to camera on her own like the other DC guests do (or maybe the producers don't think she is); this section becoming an "interview" with Jeff.
Have they done this with other guests?
Have they done this with other guests?
Originally Posted by davads:
“It's a tad disappointing how Sharron doesn't seem to feel confident enough to deliver the usual end-of-part-one piece to camera on her own like the other DC guests do (or maybe the producers don't think she is); this section becoming an "interview" with Jeff.
Have they done this with other guests?”
“It's a tad disappointing how Sharron doesn't seem to feel confident enough to deliver the usual end-of-part-one piece to camera on her own like the other DC guests do (or maybe the producers don't think she is); this section becoming an "interview" with Jeff.
Have they done this with other guests?”
This happens very often. I have a feeling it is when the guests have not prepared anything substantial for the slot. Or that they have been draughted in at short notice. It can be quite informative at times.
Originally Posted by Flyboy152:
“This happens very often. I have a feeling it is when the guests have not prepared anything substantial for the slot. Or that they have been draughted in at short notice. It can be quite informative at times.”
“This happens very often. I have a feeling it is when the guests have not prepared anything substantial for the slot. Or that they have been draughted in at short notice. It can be quite informative at times.”
I suppose so. On reflection some of the pre-prepared bits can be a bit flat. With the exception of Paul Zenon's performance pieces obviously
I managed to catch a bit of this mornings early repeat. Rachel, a short, tight, backless, 'tutti frutti' dress and 'messy' hair.
Fabulous.
Fabulous.
Originally Posted by David McMahon:
“More discussion!
Merge??
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s...1#post42774223”
“More discussion!
Merge??
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s...1#post42774223”
I think one discussion started out about Countdown being better these days and the other is about what dresses Rachel wears!!!!
Originally Posted by MrsRobinson:
“I think one discussion started out about Countdown being better these days and the other is about what dresses Rachel wears!!!!”
“I think one discussion started out about Countdown being better these days and the other is about what dresses Rachel wears!!!!”
Countdown is Rachel!
http://www.youtube.com/user/WhiteAng...v?blend=2&ob=1
Originally Posted by David McMahon:
“Countdown is Rachel!
http://www.youtube.com/user/WhiteAng...v?blend=2&ob=1”
“Countdown is Rachel!
http://www.youtube.com/user/WhiteAng...v?blend=2&ob=1”
You bet it is
Also, Susy is looking sexy again
Originally Posted by FlaviaCacake:
“Looking lovely as usual in short tight backless dress. Wow.”
“Looking lovely as usual in short tight backless dress. Wow.”
Is she wearing anything under it?
Jeff Stelling looking very tanned today, from a certain angle it looks like he's doing an impression of Adam Ant.
Nice dress on Rachel.
Nice dress on Rachel.
Originally Posted by eugenespeed:
“Nice dress on Rachel.”
“Nice dress on Rachel.”
Certainly is
Would look even better off though
42 of 165
