|
||||||||
Still better with Sky HD ? |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,783
|
Quote:
Not at all. It isn't mentioned because it's absolutely obvious. This is not a DSat newbie forum. It's for people who know what Freesat+ is otherwise they would not know to come here.
I suggest you try reading the other threads in this forum, many of which you will find completely disprove your theory. By assuming everyone knows everything you are giving completely misleading replies, only you know if you're doing this deliberately, or if it's just accidental on your part?. Nothing is 'absolutely obvious', it may be to you, but not to the majority of readers. My sole concern is to try and correct such misleading posts, regardless of which 'side' they may be on. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,460
|
Quote:
But which you were deliberately NOT mentioning, in an attempt to make Freesat look better than it is - a completely biassed and misleading opinion.
Everyone knows Sky is a pay TV service that offers gazillions of channels, why do you not understand that some people simply don't want to pay a subscription or want such a large number of channels?Quote:
I'll repeat again, for the third time - if you DON'T want to pay anything, you want a PVR, and you're not bothered about HD - the the Freesat PVR is not only the BEST choice, it's the ONLY choice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 252
|
Minimum of Sky sub is 18months i think mate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,783
|
Quote:
Minimum of Sky sub is 18months i think mate.
jzee/tern - looks like we'll have to agree to disagree, have a nice weekend both of you. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,324
|
Quote:
I wasn't aware this was a closed forum?, with only experienced and competent members allowed to read it?.
I suggest you try reading the other threads in this forum, many of which you will find completely disprove your theory. By assuming everyone knows everything you are giving completely misleading replies, only you know if you're doing this deliberately, or if it's just accidental on your part?. Nothing is 'absolutely obvious', it may be to you, but not to the majority of readers. My sole concern is to try and correct such misleading posts, regardless of which 'side' they may be on. Your opinion of other forum members: that they are so cretinously stupid that they need you to tell them, time after time, that they get more content with a subscription service than they do with a free one speaks volumes about your attitude. |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 20,371
|
Quote:
Your opinion of other forum members: that they are so cretinously stupid that they need you to tell them, time after time, that they get more content with a subscription service than they do with a free one speaks volumes about your attitude.
With Freesat you're buying a piece of hardware, whereas with Sky's £49 deal you're paying for the hardware and SD/HD content for a year. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:00.



Everyone knows Sky is a pay TV service that offers gazillions of channels, why do you not understand that some people simply don't want to pay a subscription or want such a large number of channels?