I currently have an archos 605 30GB multimedia player and have never liked it. The only good thing about it is the screen size for viewing photos.
I am looking to purchase a new multimedia player, and am considering an ipod. I like the colours of the nano, but the memory of the classic is attractive to me.
In an attempt to make up my mind, I looked at the specs of both and found that the nano has flash memory, while the classic has a hard drive.
Flash memory seems to have quite a few positives to it - easy to erase, for one.
Is it worth getting the nano to get the flash memory, or should I go with my gut instinct and get the classic?
I am interested in other people's opinions on the fors and againsts of both players.
Thanks in advance.
I am looking to purchase a new multimedia player, and am considering an ipod. I like the colours of the nano, but the memory of the classic is attractive to me.
In an attempt to make up my mind, I looked at the specs of both and found that the nano has flash memory, while the classic has a hard drive.
Flash memory seems to have quite a few positives to it - easy to erase, for one.
Is it worth getting the nano to get the flash memory, or should I go with my gut instinct and get the classic?
I am interested in other people's opinions on the fors and againsts of both players.
Thanks in advance.