Options

Children In Need Thread 07

1575860626375

Comments

  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 3,180
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    What was that "oh no" from Terry about?!
  • Options
    gemmaovwales03gemmaovwales03 Posts: 7,183
    Forum Member
    Yep that sums up the night Mr Wogan!
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 65
    Forum Member
    blah blah blah
  • Options
    dsnikdsnik Posts: 6,800
    Forum Member
    I thing Den and Ferne should change places
    But without ferne singing
  • Options
    Amy SlymouseAmy Slymouse Posts: 7,416
    Forum Member
    terri21 wrote: »
    no matter what you think of denise VO shes a good singer

    I like Denise, but she's an average singer. Not in Dusty's class.

    She'd have been better off giving a fun performance of I Only Want to Be With You.
  • Options
    Merry HappyMerry Happy Posts: 8,228
    Forum Member
    At least she admitted she was only there to plug her show.
  • Options
    SarnSarn Posts: 6,318
    Forum Member
    Wow!! Denise Van O looks so different!! :eek: She looks a bit anorexic, don't ya think?

    This style really suits her - I didn't recognise her at first :eek:
  • Options
    mikehadfieldmikehadfield Posts: 2,221
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    For a supposed "entertainment extravaganza", tonight has been way off the mark.

    Doctor Who, Dragons Den and the Eastenders Beatles bits have been the highlights - and that is it.

    Wogan should reture from doing this now - hand it over to someone who can breath a bit of life and energy (Graham Norton or Jonathan Ross spring to mind).

    I've never missed a Children In Need - believe in the cause - but never have I seen such a dreadfully thrown together mess as this! No-one seems to have any passion for it - maybe all the BBC cuts have caused morale to drop and no one cares?

    Even the audience looked bored and bemused most of the time.

    The clips showing the reason for donating have been poor. Little emotional impact. And there only seems to have been about 4 or 5 of them that they keep repeating. Over the years I remember many haunting and touching clips which stayed with me long after watching - where are they this year?

    BBC - you should be ashamed. You have got to do better next time.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 65
    Forum Member
    wacko wogans back
  • Options
    djonshoredjonshore Posts: 4,759
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    What they are repeating Doctor Who, Eastenders and Dragon's Den? What the hell
  • Options
    SexbombSexbomb Posts: 20,005
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Is that really denise van outen? :eek:
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 73
    Forum Member
    Wooo back to Doctor Who!!!
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 6,259
    Forum Member
    "Oh no!" Haha! Brilliant! :D

    Anyone remember that bollocks saturday night show Denise did a few years ago?
  • Options
    MixstarMixstar Posts: 9,290
    Forum Member
    Yay Doctor Who!
  • Options
    eggshelleggshell Posts: 4,416
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Quality of this years show has been naff.

    Performances have been mailed in from most people except Kylie, The Doctors and the Sugar Babes.

    Buzzcocks piece was atrocious. Message to the Beeb and to the DJ's themselves. DJ's are slow burn, they have a three hour show to build rapport in, that is then on every day. Not one of them can go on a half hour tv show and instantly entertain in that format. Surely any half wit can see that.

    I think Wogan and Moyles are great at what they do on the radio but neither one should be allowed within a million miles of a TV show.

    Maybe Jonathon Ross can double up and do Comic Relief and CIN.
  • Options
    dsnikdsnik Posts: 6,800
    Forum Member
    I'm sorry children in need
    You have nothing to offer

    I'm out
  • Options
    Merry HappyMerry Happy Posts: 8,228
    Forum Member
    djonshore wrote: »
    What they are repeating Doctor Who, Eastenders and Dragon's Den? What the hell

    The only three things that people generally didn't hate that much.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 73
    Forum Member
    Oh look they included Peter Davison's name in the credits...how cool.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 6,786
    Forum Member
    I like Denise, but she's an average singer. Not in Dusty's class.

    She'd have been better off giving a fun performance of I Only Want to Be With You.

    I agree. She's better at the presenting stuff than this leading lady bit.
  • Options
    SarnSarn Posts: 6,318
    Forum Member
    I notice Kerplunksky isn't there this year helping out Mr W!:rolleyes: Thank goodness for that - she was just awful last year!

    Mind you, Mr W is getting worse as the years toll on - he's just not funny anymore, especially since I found out that he gets paid bundles to do this show :rolleyes::mad:
  • Options
    Drew PeacockDrew Peacock Posts: 12,164
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Sexbomb wrote: »
    Is that really denise van outen? :eek:

    Did you think it was Denise van Tits Outen......sorry had to be said ;)
  • Options
    SystemSystem Posts: 2,096,970
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Well I'm going to watch DW again and then I'm going to have to give in and go to bed, Goodnight folks! :)
  • Options
    djonshoredjonshore Posts: 4,759
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    So I guess the BBC have started on their cut backs as they said there would be more repeats on the BBC :D
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 65
    Forum Member
    oh great now its f**king doctor who i hate it i dont get the fasination with this show
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 6,786
    Forum Member
    The only three things that people generally didn't hate that much.

    I hated DW, I'm afraid. :o

    David Tennant makes me cringe.
Sign In or Register to comment.