I'm hardly a female anatomy expert but I'm not sure... 'fat bums' for example, are just that - bums full of fat. It's however entirely possible to not have a fat bum, by exercising it to minimise the natural accumulation of that there and to instead accentuate the natural muscles there (the largest in the human body apparently). But are there muscles in tits I know some of the female Gladiators had somewhat unconventially-delineated mammaries.
There are no muscles in breasts. Men and women have pectoral muscles and women have boobs on top, which are made of mammary glands and fat. The reason you see femal body builders with oddly shaped boobs is that they have no fat.
No, that girl would have had small tits anyway.
I don't dislike small tits btw
That is surely impossible to say. As the breasts store fat, they normally increase in size along with body fat. Every woman has a different pattern of fat storeage, but that would be the most typical pattern. Men as well of course can store fat in their breasts. Both genders tend to lose breast fat when they lose weight. Plenty of women have mourned the loss of their cleavage after a successful diet. Hence the success of the (somewhat misleading) "hip and thigh diet" books, which suggested that breast fat was somehow different from, you know, fat.
That is surely impossible to say. As the breasts store fat, they normally increase in size along with body fat. Every woman has a different pattern of fat storeage, but that would be the most typical pattern. Men as well of course can store fat in their breasts. Both genders tend to lose breast fat when they lose weight. Plenty of women have mourned the loss of their cleavage after a successful diet. Hence the success of the (somewhat misleading) "hip and thigh diet" books, which suggested that breast fat was somehow different from, you know, fat.
Its the shape not the dress size, thing is a dress size is measured to encompass all the frame so it means nothing.
You can have a tiny little waist, huge tits, big bum etc as men like and fit into the dress, because its measured as a box shape, same time a girl with wide back, big gut and no arse will be the same size.
Marilyn Monroe was a size 16, she does not have same body as a girl with a big fat belly.
That said I like a little pot belly on a girl with big norks .
I saw This Morning a while ago and they had a display of Marylin's dresses and some geeky super fan talking Phil and Fern through it all, and he said that Marylin being a size 16 is a bit of a myth - nowadays her measurements would make her a size ten. And looking at the reasonably narrow waist on the dresses they had on show, I can believe it. I think sizes have changed over the years - even in the last ten years. I have clothes that are size 10 now, and clothes from about ten years ago that fit exactly the same and are a 12. Maybe it is just to accommodate the general increase of body size in our culture and not make everyone feel like supersized fatty boom booms.
Size 14 on a woman who is 5ft 8 or taller looks good though. Size 6-8 not good, too skinny.
Size 14 on a woman who is only 4ft 11 not so good but a size 6-8 would look in proportion.
It's all relative.
I agree, there's different body shapes and everyone's different. So it's impossible to say that every woman who's a size 14 is going to look like a whale.
I saw This Morning a while ago and they had a display of Marylin's dresses and some geeky super fan talking Phil and Fern through it all, and he said that Marylin being a size 16 is a bit of a myth - nowadays her measurements would make her a size ten. And looking at the reasonably narrow waist on the dresses they had on show, I can believe it. I think sizes have changed over the years - even in the last ten years. I have clothes that are size 10 now, and clothes from about ten years ago that fit exactly the same and are a 12. Maybe it is just to accommodate the general increase of body size in our culture and not make everyone feel like supersized fatty boom booms.
She did not buy dresses from primark did she? Isn't that the point about dress sizes, women have to buy them to cover their biggest asset, if she had a size 10 wais and a size 14 ass, she woul dhave to buy a size 14 dress off the rail - but she had all her clothes made to fit.
Comments
There are no muscles in breasts. Men and women have pectoral muscles and women have boobs on top, which are made of mammary glands and fat. The reason you see femal body builders with oddly shaped boobs is that they have no fat.
I think all 3 look lovely and in proportion.
I certainly wouldn't kick any of the out of bed for farting.
I dont know. My other half is in his bedroom on his pc Is that you darling?
That's a common misconception. She was a size 8-10.
You certainly wouldn't call any of them fat. The one on the right could easily be a 14.
All three are very nice.
No, I'm in the kitchen.:D
On purely physical matters it would depend how she holds the weight if you get my drift.
That is surely impossible to say. As the breasts store fat, they normally increase in size along with body fat. Every woman has a different pattern of fat storeage, but that would be the most typical pattern. Men as well of course can store fat in their breasts. Both genders tend to lose breast fat when they lose weight. Plenty of women have mourned the loss of their cleavage after a successful diet. Hence the success of the (somewhat misleading) "hip and thigh diet" books, which suggested that breast fat was somehow different from, you know, fat.
She's alright, but she's all tits. Not hot in the traditional sense
You are certainly not my husband then
If these were real, unretouched pictures, you would probably find that all three of them hated their body shape.
Really? I think the one one the right is too fat, the one in the middle is about right and the one on the left is a bit too thin.
I wouldn't call her fat but she's a big girl, she carries the weight very well though. She looks lovely.
It feels different when you squeeze it gently:o
No, she wore custom dresses and had a tiny waist like an 8-10 but here tits and ass were 14+
Thats what men like which is why the thead about dress size is unhelpful
I saw This Morning a while ago and they had a display of Marylin's dresses and some geeky super fan talking Phil and Fern through it all, and he said that Marylin being a size 16 is a bit of a myth - nowadays her measurements would make her a size ten. And looking at the reasonably narrow waist on the dresses they had on show, I can believe it. I think sizes have changed over the years - even in the last ten years. I have clothes that are size 10 now, and clothes from about ten years ago that fit exactly the same and are a 12. Maybe it is just to accommodate the general increase of body size in our culture and not make everyone feel like supersized fatty boom booms.
I've just loaded the dishwasher. If I do some of her wifely duties, she has more time to concentrate on others;)
Yep, and I've met women who ooze sex appeal, yet still hate the way they look. Paradoxical, as they often don't realise just how attractive they are.
I agree, there's different body shapes and everyone's different. So it's impossible to say that every woman who's a size 14 is going to look like a whale.
You arent him but you sound very like him
She did not buy dresses from primark did she? Isn't that the point about dress sizes, women have to buy them to cover their biggest asset, if she had a size 10 wais and a size 14 ass, she woul dhave to buy a size 14 dress off the rail - but she had all her clothes made to fit.