Home› Doctor Who
Click here to check out Digital Spy's Doctor Who section for the latest breaking news, rumours and updates.
Options

Cameo appearence. [SPOILER]

cherbrinkleyfancherbrinkleyfan Posts: 1,939
Forum Member
✭✭✭
in Doctor Who #1
Rose/Donna/Martha cameo appearence.

Apparently this is due to happen in this half of the series..whether it's in "Let's kill Hitler" I don't know.

I hope this is true. None have been reported on set though have they? Unless it's flashbacks...but what for?
«1

Comments

  • Options
    jimbo_bobjimbo_bob Posts: 1,935
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #2
    cherbrinkleyfan wrote: »
    Apparently this is due to happen in this half of the series..whether it's in "Let's kill Hitler" I don't know.

    I hope this is true. None have been reported on set though have they? Unless it's flashbacks...but what for?

    Before anyone else says it a little less politely: you may want to change the thread title due to potential spoliers - just saying :)

    Anyway, they appear as holograms, so I've heard.
  • Options
    temperaretemperare Posts: 3,869
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #3
    jimbo_bob wrote: »
    Before anyone else says it a little less politely: you may want to change the thread title due to potential spoliers - just saying :)

    Anyway, they appear as holograms, so I've heard.

    I hope this is the case. As much as I love Rose and Donna.. All 3 of their stories have been told and ended.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 1,114
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #4
    jimbo_bob wrote: »
    Before anyone else says it a little less politely: you may want to change the thread title due to potential spoliers - just saying :)

    Anyway, they appear as holograms, so I've heard.

    THIS!

    Come on folks, I know the news and rumours are flying left right and centre but at the very least PLEASE resist putting spoilers in the thread title. That way there's at least a chance for those of us trying to avoid them.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 35
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #5
    It is for Lets Kill Hitler because it says it on the teasers. I really hope that it is new footage instead of flashbacks!
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 35
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #6
    I read somwhere that they are definatly coming back in a hologram and they will not make the doctor happy
    But there are so many speculations at the moment that i'm just ignoring them. We will find out on saturday :):):)
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 7
    Forum Member
    #7
    Could their appearance in the forthcoming episode be linked to events in episodes written by Moffat that they were in during previous seasons of the show? I can very well believe he's been dropping hints about what's going to happen over years of his writing for the show. Maybe a review of those episodes (such as The Empty Child (Rose), Blink (Martha), Silence in the Library (Donna) (just examples)) would give us some clues?
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 259
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #8
    Another thread with spoilers in the thread title... :rolleyes:

    Perhaps it's time the Mods put out a reminder of how to post spoilers in tags and avoid them in thread titles if possible?
  • Options
    daveyboy7472daveyboy7472 Posts: 16,445
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #9
    LauraDrake81 wrote: »
    Another thread with spoilers in the thread title... :rolleyes:

    Perhaps it's time the Mods put out a reminder of how to post spoilers in tags and avoid them in thread titles if possible?

    I agree. I actually thought this thread was about these companions in The End Of Time Part 2. Yet again it's another thread title without spoiler tags on it. When will people actually get the message? :rolleyes:
  • Options
    cherbrinkleyfancherbrinkleyfan Posts: 1,939
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #10
    Sorry ma'am
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 259
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #11
    I really wasn't being rude for the sake of being rude either. :)

    It just gets frustrating when you see a spoiler in a thread title. What you have now changed it to is an example of what's fine, it means someone who is avoiding spoilers knows to simply avoid clicking into this thread.
  • Options
    cherbrinkleyfancherbrinkleyfan Posts: 1,939
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #12
    I'm so excited to see our'Rose again!
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 35
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #13
    cherbrinkleyfan wrote: »
    I'm so excited to see our'Rose again!
    Same! I really really hope it's new footage and not flashbacks.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 259
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #14
    Robert Casey wrote: »
    Same! I really really hope it's new footage and not flashbacks.

    You'll be disappointed.
  • Options
    DoctorQuiDoctorQui Posts: 6,428
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #15
    daveyboy7472 wrote: »
    I agree. I actually thought this thread was about these companions in The End Of Time Part 2. Yet again it's another thread title without spoiler tags on it. When will people actually get the message? :rolleyes:

    No time soon it seems!
  • Options
    performingmonkperformingmonk Posts: 20,086
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #16
    If it was just Donna then I think we could guess which episode that would be from.....

    Not sure why we need to see Rose and Martha again.
  • Options
    Scorpio2Scorpio2 Posts: 5,632
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #17
    I think the eyepatch lady is Donna.
  • Options
    cherbrinkleyfancherbrinkleyfan Posts: 1,939
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #18
    LauraDrake81 wrote: »
    You'll be disappointed.

    Prove it.
  • Options
    MarkBluemelMarkBluemel Posts: 1,781
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #19
    Scorpio2 wrote: »
    I think the eyepatch lady is Donna.

    I can't even begin to imagine why you would think that.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 259
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #20
    cherbrinkleyfan wrote: »
    Prove it.

    Watch it on Saturday.

    I can categorically say that
    Rose, Martha and Donna do NOT appear in person.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 35
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #21
    LauraDrake81 wrote: »
    Watch it on Saturday.

    I can categorically say that
    Rose, Martha and Donna do NOT appear in person.


    How do you know that?
  • Options
    sertonserton Posts: 730
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #22
    Well they were spot on
  • Options
    EaglestrikerEaglestriker Posts: 3,559
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #23
    Loved the 'cameos'!

    "Is there somebody whose life I haven't screwed up yet?"
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 226
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #24
    Well, technically, he didn't screw up any of their lives.

    Rose - She has her mum and dad AND the love of her life.

    Martha - She has Mickey (maybe the exception lol)

    Donna - She's married AND she's rich.

    Still, a nice continuity moment. A bit like the old TARDIS set and Ten's "I'm the Doctor" moment in the Flesh two parter.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 1,114
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #25
    AshDybala wrote: »
    Well, technically, he didn't screw up any of their lives.

    Rose - She has her mum and dad AND the love of her life.

    Martha - She has Mickey (maybe the exception lol)

    Donna - She's married AND she's rich.

    Still, a nice continuity moment. A bit like the old TARDIS set and Ten's "I'm the Doctor" moment in the Flesh two parter.

    Plus it finally puts to bed that annoying "Rose was the love of his life" perma-ship stuff that's been going on. This makes me a very, very happy Whovian :D
  • Options
    DiscoPDiscoP Posts: 5,932
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #26
    Much like seeing the seeing the old TARDIS set, the cameos left me wanting to see more. It would have been great to see a few companions from the "classic" series as well as his three latest ones, but perhaps they don't have suitable images/footage they could have used for that. It would been great to see Sarah Jane, by way of a tribute to the late, great Elizabeth Sladen,
Sign In or Register to comment.