It's front page of the mirror... I thought my eyes were playing up lmao.
From those pics I bet anything you like she knew the paps would be there.
But many women in their 40s have given birth after successful IVF treatment with private clinics costing from £3,000 per cycle. However, experts say it is rare for a woman in their 50s to become *pregnant from IVF.
And if it doesn't work, they've 'discussed the possiblity of adoption'. Who in their right mind would let those two feckless fools adopt a puppy, let alone a child?
So Denise, Why would you think anyone would turn down a 54 year old, alcoholic, druggie, depressive, unfaithful and exhibitionist women to have fertility treatment or adopt a baby?
I do think that a strong eye should be kept on the relative who works at the fertility clinic to see that strings wont be pulled.
Proof, if any were needed, that this woman is an utterly selfish, irresponsible moron. Having a child is a privilege, not a right. Just an idea Denise: How about turning your attentions to your existing children rather than being a middle aged soak pratting about with your toyboy????:rolleyes:
So Denise, Why would you think anyone would turn down a 54 year old, alcoholic, druggie, depressive, unfaithful and exhibitionist women to have fertility treatment or adopt a baby?
I do think that a strong eye should be kept on the relative who works at the fertility clinic to see that strings wont be pulled.
She was at a fertility clinic in Manchester gilliedew, the relative works at one in LIverpool.
The Wail piece also says a friend says 'a newborn wouldn't faze her at all'. What a prime load of old cack. Newborns are hard work for anyone, never mind a fifty-plusser. My mum had my sister at 42, never mind 54, and found it very hard indeed.
:eek::eek:
Somebody should get her existing children to talk to her before she inflicts herself on any further poor unsuspecting offspring. What kind of idiot would allow this to happen? Hopefully common sense will prevail. She's ghastly
Proof, if any were needed, that this woman is an utterly selfish, irresponsible moron. Having a child is a privilege, not a right. Just an idea Denise: How about turning your attentions to your existing children rather than being a middle aged soak pratting about with your toyboy????:rolleyes:
Well, if its true I hope they are paying for it and not us. there was an article in the paper today about a woman of 38 not allowed to have IVF because she is too old. I can't imagine denise will be allowed to adopt unless they go abroad.
FFS! We have the menopause for a reason! Too many defects could occur because of Welsh's age - that's providing she manages to get pregnant at 54 in the first place!
Stupid, selfish bint is doing a Chantelle and having a baybeeee for magazine covers and money.
FFS! We have the menopause for a reason! Too many defects could occur because of Welsh's age - that's providing she manages to get pregnant at 54 in the first place!
Stupid, selfish bint is doing a Chantelle and having a baybeeee for magazine covers and money.
To be fair, some women go through the menopause while they are still of child-bearing age - under 40 & even younger.
That said, my first thought when I saw this headline was 'what a selfish cow.'. I have 3 kids and my youngest is about to turn 18 and I'm years younger than Welch, it's been hard work and I can't imagine wanting to start again, even if I could.
To be fair, some women go through the menopause while they are still of child-bearing age - under 40 & even younger.
That said, my first thought when I saw this headline was 'what a selfish cow.'. I have 3 kids and my youngest is about to turn 18 and I'm years younger than Welch, it's been hard work and I can't imagine wanting to start again, even if I could.
She won't have even considered the poor child with an old mother. she will hand it over to someone else to look after.
To be fair, some women go through the menopause while they are still of child-bearing age - under 40 & even younger.
My friend started her menopause at 33 and had IVF (which they paid for - not NHS). But that's different to someone who is at the *normal* age for menopause wanting IVF imo.
If she was 10 years younger, I'd actually say 'go for it' but being 54 and wanting IVF just to have a child with her younger partner is wrong imo. She's already got 2 kids and really should count her blessings there.
Hasn't she traumatised the two she has enough with her antics ? Now this. The woman is selfish to the core. It smacks of needing to please the toyboy & show him she can fulfill his every need....even a baby.
I give the relationship two years.....one if she gets pregnant.
Comments
I'm sure she'll be hawking the miracle baby stories to the highest bidder if it's a success
From those pics I bet anything you like she knew the paps would be there.
And if it doesn't work, they've 'discussed the possiblity of adoption'. Who in their right mind would let those two feckless fools adopt a puppy, let alone a child?
I do think that a strong eye should be kept on the relative who works at the fertility clinic to see that strings wont be pulled.
She was at a fertility clinic in Manchester gilliedew, the relative works at one in LIverpool.
The Wail piece also says a friend says 'a newborn wouldn't faze her at all'. What a prime load of old cack. Newborns are hard work for anyone, never mind a fifty-plusser. My mum had my sister at 42, never mind 54, and found it very hard indeed.
Somebody should get her existing children to talk to her before she inflicts herself on any further poor unsuspecting offspring. What kind of idiot would allow this to happen? Hopefully common sense will prevail. She's ghastly
Well, if its true I hope they are paying for it and not us. there was an article in the paper today about a woman of 38 not allowed to have IVF because she is too old. I can't imagine denise will be allowed to adopt unless they go abroad.
Stupid, selfish bint is doing a Chantelle and having a baybeeee for magazine covers and money.
To be fair, some women go through the menopause while they are still of child-bearing age - under 40 & even younger.
That said, my first thought when I saw this headline was 'what a selfish cow.'. I have 3 kids and my youngest is about to turn 18 and I'm years younger than Welch, it's been hard work and I can't imagine wanting to start again, even if I could.
She won't have even considered the poor child with an old mother. she will hand it over to someone else to look after.
My friend started her menopause at 33 and had IVF (which they paid for - not NHS). But that's different to someone who is at the *normal* age for menopause wanting IVF imo.
If she was 10 years younger, I'd actually say 'go for it' but being 54 and wanting IVF just to have a child with her younger partner is wrong imo. She's already got 2 kids and really should count her blessings there.
I give the relationship two years.....one if she gets pregnant.
I think/hope so.
She can then sell the heartbreak of the failed IVF and how she let her fella down:rolleyes::mad: