Ah! confessions, love it i can include that in the unified atheist alliance script..book. Something like you can fess up some sins and stuff and then get away scot free. Now need some sins, something about covering the neighbours wife, need that in there, and i don't know i like the idea of having Sundays off so no working on a Sunday, that will give us time to not praise anyone, any other ideas? i reckon we need a good 10 commandments at least.
Thou shalt not post anything ending in tard. Not even leotard, ok?
I think we should also say some stuff about killing to, just to spice things up a bit.
OK, what are we going to say about it? is everyone allowed to do it or not allowed to do it? we could duck it a bit if we're not to sure and either; say early on in the book, dont do it! naughty! but later we could have a guy who could be a kind of main guy, and he could be a bit more.. well... hmm maybe its ok, you know really ambiguous the f**k out of it. or we could just mention it once but just be really non commital on the whole issue? either way i really cant see it causing any problems.
OK, what are we going to say about it? is everyone allowed to do it or not allowed to do it? we could duck it a bit if we're not to sure and either; say early on in the book, dont do it! naughty! but later we could have a guy who could be a kind of main guy, and he could be a bit more.. well... hmm maybe its ok, you know really ambiguous the f**k out of it. or we could just mention it once but just be really non commital on the whole issue? either way i really cant see it causing any problems.
I think the best thing to do would be to say if you do it you will go to the bad guys house and he will tell you off, but then later on get the hero of the piece to do it a heck of a lot, but really its a metaphor for how you are supposed to no do it. Honestly.
Who said it isn't? Not me. I used it as a mild rebuke to describe somebody dim-witted or idiotic. Typically, it gets fixated on though so the other righteous DS contingent can get all huffy about it.
1. retard - a person of subnormal intelligence
changeling, cretin, half-wit, idiot, imbecile, moron
mongoloid - a person suffering from Down syndrome (no longer used technically in this sense) simpleton, simple - a person lacking intelligence or common sense
Comments
One sick puppy...and you expect us to take you seriously??
oh no, i'm not meant to like them am i. god damn it. no i mean just damn it.
I think we should also say some stuff about killing to, just to spice things up a bit.
But, of course, it's your choice, and I was just explaining what the issue was.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RTKU-xomjI
Asshole being most appropriate...In your video
You just made Darwin cry, you can't tell because of the beard but he is.
Nietzsche is doing a sketch of it. He will sing it in blood
Wait, let me see if I care.........................................just got to blow the cobwebs away and i will get back to you.
OK, what are we going to say about it? is everyone allowed to do it or not allowed to do it? we could duck it a bit if we're not to sure and either; say early on in the book, dont do it! naughty! but later we could have a guy who could be a kind of main guy, and he could be a bit more.. well... hmm maybe its ok, you know really ambiguous the f**k out of it. or we could just mention it once but just be really non commital on the whole issue? either way i really cant see it causing any problems.
Not the leotards
You must have confused me with someone who gives a f what you think!
I think the best thing to do would be to say if you do it you will go to the bad guys house and he will tell you off, but then later on get the hero of the piece to do it a heck of a lot, but really its a metaphor for how you are supposed to no do it. Honestly.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WNrx2jq184
Who said it isn't? Not me. I used it as a mild rebuke to describe somebody dim-witted or idiotic. Typically, it gets fixated on though so the other righteous DS contingent can get all huffy about it.
I don't care about insults. I just think you're kinda schitzo for claiming it isn't an insult.
What, if any, is the atheist viewpoint on such usage?
Simply reinforces what I thought.
I never said it wasn't an insult, I said it wasn't offensive. Can't you read?
Can't speak for everyone but I find spazz a pretty nasty word with a very nasty history.
My little lad spazzes out if he has too much sugar.