It's also been overlooked how the Frost brood have caused so much damage to their current home. The carnage around the exterior of the property, the fact the neighbours loathe them and how the tenants of the adjoining property moved soon after their arrival.
Hands up if you think the feckless Frost's will treat their new eco-home any differently.
According to the Left though, we should embrace these free-choice lifestyles. How many of them would like to live next door to the Frost's?
I have an obvious solution.
The Government should match up the problem families in the UK - and move them all next door to the people on the Guardian newspaper's mailing list (starting with Polly Toynbee). I would be happy to pay a little more tax to fund the housing benefit costs. Polly Toynbee and Heather Frost as next door neighbours would be a sight to behold - as long as Polly isn't allowed to flee to her Tuscan villa.:D
The Government should match up the problem families in the UK - and move them all next door to the people on the Guardian newspaper's mailing list (starting with Polly Toynbee). I would be happy to pay a little more tax to fund the housing benefit costs. Polly Toynbee and Heather Frost as next door neighbours would be a sight to behold - as long as Polly isn't allowed to flee to her Tuscan villa.:D
Aye - and build some more houses in Downing Street too.
Let them know what's its like :cool:
But you have ignored or were not aware of the wider benefits provided by taxpayers to poor/unemployed people who have children, thus not fully understanding the potential motivation to continue to breed.
I'm sure there are some apologists on here who think it would be against her human rights to not have flying lessons, and that anyone who this was an abuse of public funds is in some way akin to Eichmann. :rolleyes:
The level of intelligence, not to mention compassion, amongst some in this country is worrying to say the least. Some folk seem to lap up these stories in the media, pontificate upon high about how wrong they are then vilify them for being victims of government policies. I dread to think how any children they have are being brought up. Children don't see colour, disability, illness, they interact and play happily with whoever they are around. To have that replaced by hate, scorn, racism or xenophobia learnt from their parents is a tragedy. The government and media have an awful lot to answer for...
Eh? There's a government policy to have 11 kids in 15 years?
She's not a victim of government policies - the taxpayer is the victim of her lifestyle choice.Now she's going on telly saying that she's considering turning down a property that's being specifically built and designed to accomdate her and her kids. I'm struggling to see how appearing on ITV is her "keeping a low profile for a while" and I struggle to see why she thinks she can mess an authority around who are bending over backwards to house her.
"I'm 50/50 whether or not I'll take it..."
Who does she think she is? I'd give a straight choice now that the local authority have chucked £400,000 at this. Take it or **** off.
Eh? There's a government policy to have 11 kids in 15 years?
She's not a victim of government policies - the taxpayer is the victim of her lifestyle choice.Now she's going on telly saying that she's considering turning down a property that's being specifically built and designed to accomdate her and her kids. I'm struggling to see how appearing on ITV is her "keeping a low profile for a while" and I struggle to see why she thinks she can mess an authority around who are bending over backwards to house her.
"I'm 50/50 whether or not I'll take it..."
Who does she think she is? I'd give a straight choice now that the local authority have chucked £400,000 at this. Take it or **** off.
If her children are at risk of being victamised and hassled over this what do you think she should do.?
I'm sure there are some apologists on here who think it would be against her human rights to not have flying lessons, and that anyone who this was an abuse of public funds is in some way akin to Eichmann. :rolleyes:
And I'm sure some on here who would like to see her dragged into the street and stoned :rolleyes:
If her children are at risk of being victamised and hassled over this what do you think she should do.?
Who's threatening them? I live in the same neighbourhood as they do. Nobody around here is threatening her kids - that's just an attempt to deflect attention and scorn away from Frost herself.
It's okay condemning her now but if 22 years ago (when she become pregnant for the first time at the age of 14) her parents and the local authorities had done something about it this situation may never have arisen. So maybe they should take a good look at themselves and ask why did they allow it to happen. At 14 years old most people are considered to be children.
Who's threatening them? I live in the same neighbourhood as they do. Nobody around here is threatening her kids - that's just an attempt to deflect attention and scorn away from Frost herself.
By the media.
So you are saying we have to be selective about which reports we believe and which we don't believe depending on what they are reporting ?
Comments
If you click on the link in post 200 you will see there are no dead bodies anywhere there's not much rubbish about either
I put 'IF' at the start of my post.
So you did
Sorry.
I notice it's the other neighbour who's got the car in front of their front door. Blatant lies, indeed!
Who are you accusing of telling lies
I have an obvious solution.
The Government should match up the problem families in the UK - and move them all next door to the people on the Guardian newspaper's mailing list (starting with Polly Toynbee). I would be happy to pay a little more tax to fund the housing benefit costs. Polly Toynbee and Heather Frost as next door neighbours would be a sight to behold - as long as Polly isn't allowed to flee to her Tuscan villa.:D
Aye - and build some more houses in Downing Street too.
Let them know what's its like :cool:
But you have ignored or were not aware of the wider benefits provided by taxpayers to poor/unemployed people who have children, thus not fully understanding the potential motivation to continue to breed.
Any idea what jobs they have?
Not according to the Telegraph....she paid for microlight lessons for her partner
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/9884775/Jobless-mother-of-11-with-council-mansion-and-horse-now-said-to-have-bought-flying-lessons.html
I'm sure there are some apologists on here who think it would be against her human rights to not have flying lessons, and that anyone who this was an abuse of public funds is in some way akin to Eichmann. :rolleyes:
Minor correction - we paid for microlight lessons for her partner
If the daughter has enough spare cash to keep a horse maybe she should think of finding her own place to live
True
What does not appear to be true is that "we have or are are currently paying for HER to have flying lessons"
Did they take the horse?
Eh? There's a government policy to have 11 kids in 15 years?
She's not a victim of government policies - the taxpayer is the victim of her lifestyle choice.Now she's going on telly saying that she's considering turning down a property that's being specifically built and designed to accomdate her and her kids. I'm struggling to see how appearing on ITV is her "keeping a low profile for a while" and I struggle to see why she thinks she can mess an authority around who are bending over backwards to house her.
"I'm 50/50 whether or not I'll take it..."
Who does she think she is? I'd give a straight choice now that the local authority have chucked £400,000 at this. Take it or **** off.
If her children are at risk of being victamised and hassled over this what do you think she should do.?
And I'm sure some on here who would like to see her dragged into the street and stoned :rolleyes:
Am I right
That's what I thought.
Take a long hard look at herself
Who's threatening them? I live in the same neighbourhood as they do. Nobody around here is threatening her kids - that's just an attempt to deflect attention and scorn away from Frost herself.
It's okay condemning her now but if 22 years ago (when she become pregnant for the first time at the age of 14) her parents and the local authorities had done something about it this situation may never have arisen. So maybe they should take a good look at themselves and ask why did they allow it to happen. At 14 years old most people are considered to be children.
By the media.
So you are saying we have to be selective about which reports we believe and which we don't believe depending on what they are reporting ?