Options

Dodgy stuff off the back of a van?

frisky pythonfrisky python Posts: 9,737
Forum Member
I'm wondering here how many DSers buy films that have been copied and are not the real deal? Or other fake goods, like named brands that are either poor replicas or have been smuggled in and not paid tax on? Or do some cash-in-hand work and don't register as self-employed?

I know quite a few people who do the above who see nothing wrong in it and I just wondered how common this is. Is it morally acceptable amongst your friends/acquaintances?
«1

Comments

  • Options
    gasheadgashead Posts: 13,833
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I would never, ever buy a copied film that's quite probably been illegally downloaded or cam'd from the screen. Sell them*, yes, but never buy.

    * That's a joke BTW. I give them away.
  • Options
    netcurtainsnetcurtains Posts: 23,494
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    People do what they need to do to get by.
  • Options
    frisky pythonfrisky python Posts: 9,737
    Forum Member
    I could understand that netcurtains if there was a need of something, but no-one needs a dodgy DVD, dodgy clothes etc
  • Options
    gasheadgashead Posts: 13,833
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I could understand that netcurtains if there was a need of something, but no-one needs a dodgy DVD, dodgy clothes etc
    Well, beyond food, shelter etc, no-one needs anything, however plenty of people want these things, and are happy to pay for knocked-off versions of them of varying quality.
  • Options
    SchadenfreudSchadenfreud Posts: 1,382
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I'm wondering here how many DSers buy films that have been copied and are not the real deal? Or other fake goods, like named brands that are either poor replicas or have been smuggled in and not paid tax on? Or do some cash-in-hand work and don't register as self-employed?

    I know quite a few people who do the above who see nothing wrong in it and I just wondered how common this is. Is it morally acceptable amongst your friends/acquaintances?

    I know a guy on the dole that makes a very good living out of it. He hasn't had a proper job for ten years plus.
    Yet he bought a brand new Ford last year and has a reasonably good lifestyle.

    He's a member of a usenet group that has access to rare British sit coms and dramas on their own download site. He cycles through about ten Ebay accounts per year as they keep getting banned for selling 'pirate' DVD's of these sitcoms etc. He doesn't try to hide what they are and he sells loads.

    He's a pretty good friend and most of us are a bit ambiguous about his activities, we take the piss out of him but none of us will report him. Probably nothing would happen to him if we did...
  • Options
    frisky pythonfrisky python Posts: 9,737
    Forum Member
    But is that morally right? I don't agree with it because I find it morally wrong to rip off the people who made the film or designed the clothes. I'm registered self-employed rather than do cash in hand.

    I guess my interest is piqued as to what the good people of DS think seeing there is moral outrage daily for anyone who claims benefits and doesn't spend them how they think they should for example. So, moral outrage in one area, but does it extend into others? And the reasoning behind it.
  • Options
    frisky pythonfrisky python Posts: 9,737
    Forum Member
    Schadenfreud - on a personal level, do you find what your friend does as morally acceptable?

    Also, when you say the dole, do you mean unemployment benefit? If so, how has he stayed on it for 10yrs?
  • Options
    Uncle FesterUncle Fester Posts: 15,357
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Psst , psst , what are you looking for ;);)
  • Options
    tysonstormtysonstorm Posts: 24,609
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    In the circles I know it's fairly common. And it is only going to get worse as people do what they feel they have to do to survive and to maintain their standard of living. Can't blame them really.

    I do buy "off the back of a lorry" now and again, but not films though, Christ, I can DL better quality ones myself. Buying knock-off DVD's is so 90's. :p
  • Options
    Sifter22Sifter22 Posts: 12,057
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    People still buy dodgy DVD copies? Thought that died in about 2005 with the rise of the internet download
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,133
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I do a lucrative sideline in British pornographic DVDs .
    3 for ten pounds . Tops up the dole nicely :cool:

    Old blokes are my best customers
  • Options
    technologisttechnologist Posts: 13,419
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    But just look at what happens if you dabble in this - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19253359 - 4 years imprisonment ...
    and if you sell DVD etc - without a BBFC rating trading standard will get you on that at well....
    so stop thieving..It is not worth it!
  • Options
    frisky pythonfrisky python Posts: 9,737
    Forum Member
    So peoples morals slide when they feel they're being unjustly squeezed?

    I just find it quite hard to believe the moral outrage I see on here (and Facebook) over benefit scroungers, immigrants etc with people feeling these groups are getting something they haven't worked for or deserved, but practically none at all about doing something dodgy on the side whereby the original artist or designer is defrauded!
  • Options
    netcurtainsnetcurtains Posts: 23,494
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    So peoples morals slide when they feel they're being unjustly squeezed?

    I just find it quite hard to believe the moral outrage I see on here (and Facebook) over benefit scroungers, immigrants etc with people feeling these groups are getting something they haven't worked for or deserved, but practically none at all about doing something dodgy on the side whereby the original artist or designer is defrauded!

    Something I have noticed is that people generally only feel moral outrage over something they wouldn't do or or can't do or don't want to do.
    Take for example the pensioners that don't bat an eyelid over the unemployed being forced into working for their benefits but they'd be outraged if the government forced them into working for their pensions.
    Take the family who don't bat an eyelid over claiming tax credits and child benefit but are outraged when a single mother is given a poxy council house and benefits.
    People get pissy over someone else getting what they can't have and our particular governemnt are fantastic at making us turn on each other. People just aren't seeing who is our real 'enemy', it isn't the geezer down the market selling dodgy perfume.
    They want you to grass on your neighbour, they positively encourage it.
    I'm not going to get pissy and grass on someone for selling something off the back of a lorry when I've spent all morning downloading. I'd be a fcking hypocrite. I'm not going to get pissy over my neighbour claiming a benefit I can't get not when my husband spent six months claiming JSA whilst delivering pizzas cash in hand because we were skint and the baby was going through nappies like nobodies business.
    Like I said in my other post we all do what we need to do in order to get by.
    From the stuff I read on DS I think a lot of the outrage stems from jealousy and that well known emotion of feeling hard done by. Why should my neighbour have a massive flat screen TV when I'm working all hours blah blah blah. I bet it fell of the back of lorry.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,133
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Something I have noticed is that people generally only feel moral outrage over something they wouldn't do or or can't do or don't want to do.
    Take for example the pensioners that don't bat an eyelid over the unemployed being forced into working for their benefits but they'd be outraged if the government forced them into working for their pensions.
    Take the family who don't bat an eyelid over claiming tax credits and child benefit but are outraged when a single mother is given a poxy council house and benefits.
    People get pissy over someone else getting what they can't have and our particular governemnt are fantastic at making us turn on each other. People just aren't seeing who is our real 'enemy', it isn't the geezer down the market selling dodgy perfume.
    They want you to grass on your neighbour, they positively encourage it.
    I'm not going to get pissy and grass on someone for selling something off the back of a lorry when I've spent all morning downloading. I'd be a fcking hypocrite. I'm not going to get pissy over my neighbour claiming a benefit I can't get not when my husband spent six months claiming JSA whilst delivering pizzas cash in hand because we were skint and the baby was going through nappies like nobodies business.
    Like I said in my other post we all do what we need to do in order to get by.
    From the stuff I read on DS I think a lot of the outrage stems from jealousy and that well known emotion of feeling hard done by. Why should my neighbour have a massive flat screen TV when I'm working all hours blah blah blah. I bet it fell of the back of lorry.

    Excellent post :)
  • Options
    cessnacessna Posts: 6,747
    Forum Member
    Something I have noticed is that people generally only feel moral outrage over something they wouldn't do or or can't do or don't want to do.
    Take for example the pensioners that don't bat an eyelid over the unemployed being forced into working for their benefits but they'd be outraged if the government forced them into working for their pensions.


    >>>

    Wasnt aware unemployed are being forced into working for their benefits - But on the point of Pensioners working for our pensions - Most of us already have ! In my case since leaving school aged 14 !
  • Options
    netcurtainsnetcurtains Posts: 23,494
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    cessna wrote: »
    Something I have noticed is that people generally only feel moral outrage over something they wouldn't do or or can't do or don't want to do.
    Take for example the pensioners that don't bat an eyelid over the unemployed being forced into working for their benefits but they'd be outraged if the government forced them into working for their pensions.


    >>>

    Wasnt aware unemployed are being forced into working for their benefits - But on the point of Pensioners working for our pensions - Most of us already have ! In my case since leaving school aged 14 !

    You've not heard of workfare?
  • Options
    TrollHunterTrollHunter Posts: 12,496
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    He's a member of a usenet group that has access to rare British sit coms and dramas on their own download site. He cycles through about ten Ebay accounts per year as they keep getting banned for selling 'pirate' DVD's of these sitcoms etc. He doesn't try to hide what they are and he sells loads.
    I'd actually pay money for some rare BBC dramas that were never released and not feel bad in the slightest. 'The Cops' aka 'Stanton Blues' being one of them Great British police drama that I've never seem hide nor hair of since it broadcast.
  • Options
    frisky pythonfrisky python Posts: 9,737
    Forum Member
    Something I have noticed is that people generally only feel moral outrage over something they wouldn't do or or can't do or don't want to do.
    Take for example the pensioners that don't bat an eyelid over the unemployed being forced into working for their benefits but they'd be outraged if the government forced them into working for their pensions.
    Take the family who don't bat an eyelid over claiming tax credits and child benefit but are outraged when a single mother is given a poxy council house and benefits.
    People get pissy over someone else getting what they can't have and our particular governemnt are fantastic at making us turn on each other. People just aren't seeing who is our real 'enemy', it isn't the geezer down the market selling dodgy perfume.
    They want you to grass on your neighbour, they positively encourage it.
    I'm not going to get pissy and grass on someone for selling something off the back of a lorry when I've spent all morning downloading. I'd be a fcking hypocrite. I'm not going to get pissy over my neighbour claiming a benefit I can't get not when my husband spent six months claiming JSA whilst delivering pizzas cash in hand because we were skint and the baby was going through nappies like nobodies business.
    Like I said in my other post we all do what we need to do in order to get by.
    From the stuff I read on DS I think a lot of the outrage stems from jealousy and that well known emotion of feeling hard done by. Why should my neighbour have a massive flat screen TV when I'm working all hours blah blah blah. I bet it fell of the back of lorry.

    I don't see it as who the "real" enemy is. I registered as self-employed because morally it's the right thing to do. I can hardly complain about the state of affairs if I'm not actually doing my bit to contribute. And the thing about the man selling dodgy perfumes - where did he purchase them from? Is it propping up some other illegal activities? Are they even safe to use? (I ask that as the things I make I have to ensure their safety before placing them on the market).

    Is that what it's about - getting one over on the Govt?
  • Options
    CaldariCaldari Posts: 5,890
    Forum Member
    There's a boozer around here that's well know for dodgy dealings like this. You can hand over a 'shopping list' to one of the more nefarious regulars and then they go and shoplift the goods for you. In recent times they've been doing a roaring trade.
  • Options
    tim59tim59 Posts: 47,188
    Forum Member
    I don't see it as who the "real" enemy is. I registered as self-employed because morally it's the right thing to do. I can hardly complain about the state of affairs if I'm not actually doing my bit to contribute. And the thing about the man selling dodgy perfumes - where did he purchase them from? Is it propping up some other illegal activities? Are they even safe to use? (I ask that as the things I make I have to ensure their safety before placing them on the market).

    Is that what it's about - getting one over on the Govt?

    It could be just trying to survive, I over the years have saved myself hundreds of pounds by asking can you do me a better deal for cash, 99.9 i get a better deal and save cash what that person does with the cash i give him is not my concern. I smoke i have a friend who works in france and comes home every weekend, bring my **** for me, he does not make any money from it, but a save myself a fortune. and a few other things like that, i dont feel guity at all
  • Options
    frisky pythonfrisky python Posts: 9,737
    Forum Member
    Bit if everyone took that attitude, of doing stuff for cash and not paying tax, then what would happen?
  • Options
    tim59tim59 Posts: 47,188
    Forum Member
    Bit if everyone took that attitude, of doing stuff for cash and not paying tax, then what would happen?

    Is that not big companys and rich people do anyway, they use loopholes not to pay tax .Its not the little man doing the little back hander for £50 thats landed use this way when companys and people can save millions or billions by useing the tax system there the ones that goverment are to scared to take on. Untill this is stopped i will save myself every penny i can. If someone offers me a good deal i will take it. My morals are to look after my family, if that means making money go futher so be it. Same as all my drinks at xmas were got for me by the same friend, and only payed half of what it would have cost over here
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 4,391
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Do people still buy pirate DVD's?

    Old style.
  • Options
    SchadenfreudSchadenfreud Posts: 1,382
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Schadenfreud - on a personal level, do you find what your friend does as morally acceptable?

    Also, when you say the dole, do you mean unemployment benefit? If so, how has he stayed on it for 10yrs?

    Sorry for not replying earlier but I've only just finished work.

    Morally it's wrong, no doubt about that and some of us let him know about it in very uncertain terms.

    I think he's been on so long because he has some sort of minor disability. I don't want to go into too much detail for obvious reasons.
Sign In or Register to comment.