I must say the recent case of a call centre girl wanting to look like Jordan via NHS money because she wanted to be a glamour model is not what the NHS is really for.
Gender change operations, IVF, cosmetic surgery, laser eye surgery and bariatric surgery can all be considered not really necessary for curing someone's bodilly health, although it could change their mental health.
Then there are those people brought over from foreign shores who are in need of an operation. They get the best treatment and are nursed for months at an enormous cost by the NHS in Britain.
But I don't know where the line should be drawn.
I saw this doing the rounds on Facebook. On the opposite page there was a picture of a little girl with no hair, who needed further cancer treatment drugs but was being denied. I know to take what I see in The sun with a pinch of salt but it left a very bitter taste in my mouth.
I saw her being interviewed and it seems she has been suffering because of her lack of breast tissue .... but why get such big ones? She will get attention she does not want imo When I was a teenager I was watching a rock group and some man tried to put his hand down my top and mine weren't as big as hers. I think she has not thought about this properly and will regret what she has done one day.
I saw her being interviewed and it seems she has been suffering because of her lack of breast tissue .... but why get such big ones?
Stupidity - she does want to be the next Katie Cut-Price after all.
As to why the NHS paid for such large tits, at a guess the cost is the same whether you go for B or DD as most of the cost is cutting her open and not for a lump of silicone.
I saw her being interviewed and it seems she has been suffering because of her lack of breast tissue .... but why get such big ones? She will get attention she does not want imo When I was a teenager I was watching a rock group and some man tried to put his hand down my top and mine weren't as big as hers. I think she has not thought about this properly and will regret what she has done one day.
I wonder if she will be back at hospital one day with severe back pain.
They do. Still relatively small and slightly oddly shaped. But since the Sun currently see her as somewhat of a sideshow attraction, she'll probably get her 15 minutes of fame out of this but she will absolutely not get a modelling career out of it.
Maybe a dermatologist can do something about her strange skin pigmentation. She goes from corned beef legs, to pale and topped off with an orange head!
Personally i dont think they look good at all! So round and so far apart. At least with natural boobs you get a nicer shape and they dont look like two balls have just been placed in the body!
Everytime i see a story about someone whos gone up so many bra sizes, the breasts look like theyre miles apart. Are they supposed to look like that?
I also thought that people were advised not to go too big. If she was an a cup before, would there be enough fatty tissue and skin to be able to fit double d cups in for a long time? Or is she likely to suffer complications a few years down the line?
I don't know if it's the creosote, but she looks like she needs a good wash. I hope she enjoys her 15 seconds but I think she needs to grow up and look after her kids. Tbh the sun shouldn't be encouraging her but I'm sure Katie price is glad there's someone making her look classy.
They are horrible! They might give her some vague confidence when she's clothed but she should not be showing them off, they're very unattractive naked.
As for the 'glamma' shots, think they missed the glamourous bit out. She doesn't have the face or the figure for glamma modelling. With or without the boobs, she has a fairly average figure, a bit thick waisted and shapeless. And yes, so am I, but I'm not on the front of the Sun with only my knickers on.
The editors at the Sun must be pissing themselves at her.
I saw her being interviewed and it seems she has been suffering because of her lack of breast tissue .... but why get such big ones? She will get attention she does not want imo When I was a teenager I was watching a rock group and some man tried to put his hand down my top and mine weren't as big as hers. I think she has not thought about this properly and will regret what she has done one day.
I saw her interviewed on telly too. She may aspire to be the next Katie Price but she lacks the self promotion that KP has. I'm not a KP fan but she does know how to make the most of any given situation, this young lady didn't seem particularly articulate.
I'll repost what I said in another thread yesterday:
I read about this yesterday and still believe what I thought yesterday, she shouldn't have wasted the op on her boobs when it was her face that needed doing.
now I want to be the new Katie Price
Then please do us all a favour and kill yourself right now, I can live with the financial loss. Anyone who "aspires" to be anything like KP should be denied oxygen.
I must say the recent case of a call centre girl wanting to look like Jordan via NHS money because she wanted to be a glamour model is not what the NHS is really for.
Gender change operations, IVF, cosmetic surgery, laser eye surgery and bariatric surgery can all be considered not really necessary for curing someone's bodilly health, although it could change their mental health.
Then there are those people brought over from foreign shores who are in need of an operation. They get the best treatment and are nursed for months at an enormous cost by the NHS in Britain.
But I don't know where the line should be drawn.
A lot of places like the Arab Emirates fund these overseas patients. Also any one who arrives in casualty from overseas without a life threatening illness gets immediately told they will be charged and a lot leave the hospital I work in as they have no cash. And I work in a hospital next to a main airports express line
Also gender reassignment - having looked after these patients it isn't really unnecessary- a lot of people denied it commit suicide. Bariatric surgery actually saves NHS cash as they need much less life long treatment when they aren't obese
She's rank and very likely to end up doing some dodgy porn movies to make cash. Fake tits aside, it sums up much of what is wrong and worrying with some youngster todays - aspiring to be famous celebrities and on the cover of HEAT and such.
It's unfathomable to me that someone can claim that having very small breasts is now considered to be an affliction/medical condition that is tantamount to mental torture and trauma.
Do women with very small breasts never get married, have boyfriends, have sex etc? Is there any evidence to suggest this?
And does it automatically follow that women with large breasts are guaranteed to be more successful in life as far as relationships, sex, marriage etc? As far as I can see the only thing having larger breasts will guarantee for a woman is simply more attention.
To be fair I guess you can say larger breasted women are more likely to have sex on a casual basis, but I am talking more about long-term stuff here.
Finally, there was a quote from the woman in the article that days
'I live in terror of being seen in a bikini'.
Is that not the most ridiculous thing you have ever heard...'living in terror'? What does that even mean, that someone is going to run up to her in the street, rip her clothes off and put a bikini on her?
If you 'live in terror' of being seen in a bikini...then DON'T WEAR A BIKINI!.
Usual chavvy 'glamour model' with all that horrible writing on her body.:( I think the porn industry is still money making?
Both of those things just look like they're stuck on and she could do with a bag over her head. I thought The Sun at one time had a campaign against fake boobs?
The nature of this story is a bit disturbing really. First they reported her operation and the fact the NHS had picked up the bill.. which in itself was a blatant attack on an individual playing up to the guaranteed "outrage" when they suggest "we" have paid for it.
And now they've gone one step further and have got her to get her kit off and taken photos of her half naked to hammer home the original article. It's all a bit wrong really.
I would hope she is fully aware of the fact they're mocking her and is simply going along with it for the money.. but my worry is she's been led on and actually has no idea what they're doing. Surely she must see they're simply making fun of her?
News it certainly isn't. But I guess she has gone along with it.
Surely she must see they're simply making fun of her?
Doubtful - she really doesn't seem to have that level of awareness. She's probably still star struck that The Sun have paid for a glamour shoot with her, so she probably thinks it's her 'break' in modelling and that the pots of cash will follow soon afterwards.
Comments
Gender change operations, IVF, cosmetic surgery, laser eye surgery and bariatric surgery can all be considered not really necessary for curing someone's bodilly health, although it could change their mental health.
Then there are those people brought over from foreign shores who are in need of an operation. They get the best treatment and are nursed for months at an enormous cost by the NHS in Britain.
But I don't know where the line should be drawn.
As to why the NHS paid for such large tits, at a guess the cost is the same whether you go for B or DD as most of the cost is cutting her open and not for a lump of silicone.
Really? Blimey!
Like, I wouldn't wear NHS glasses, for example.
"Ew, you have NHS boobs..."
Everytime i see a story about someone whos gone up so many bra sizes, the breasts look like theyre miles apart. Are they supposed to look like that?
I also thought that people were advised not to go too big. If she was an a cup before, would there be enough fatty tissue and skin to be able to fit double d cups in for a long time? Or is she likely to suffer complications a few years down the line?
http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Josie-Cunningham-NHS-Free-Boob-Job-Model/348490271939216?fref=ts
I'm not a boob man, honest ..
For her frame, they do look small - ish. I'm not saying they're tiny, but I don't consider them as 'massive' as people seem to think.
As for the 'glamma' shots, think they missed the glamourous bit out. She doesn't have the face or the figure for glamma modelling. With or without the boobs, she has a fairly average figure, a bit thick waisted and shapeless. And yes, so am I, but I'm not on the front of the Sun with only my knickers on.
The editors at the Sun must be pissing themselves at her.
I saw her interviewed on telly too. She may aspire to be the next Katie Price but she lacks the self promotion that KP has. I'm not a KP fan but she does know how to make the most of any given situation, this young lady didn't seem particularly articulate.
Also gender reassignment - having looked after these patients it isn't really unnecessary- a lot of people denied it commit suicide. Bariatric surgery actually saves NHS cash as they need much less life long treatment when they aren't obese
I think they have different postcodes.
Do women with very small breasts never get married, have boyfriends, have sex etc? Is there any evidence to suggest this?
And does it automatically follow that women with large breasts are guaranteed to be more successful in life as far as relationships, sex, marriage etc? As far as I can see the only thing having larger breasts will guarantee for a woman is simply more attention.
To be fair I guess you can say larger breasted women are more likely to have sex on a casual basis, but I am talking more about long-term stuff here.
Finally, there was a quote from the woman in the article that days
'I live in terror of being seen in a bikini'.
Is that not the most ridiculous thing you have ever heard...'living in terror'? What does that even mean, that someone is going to run up to her in the street, rip her clothes off and put a bikini on her?
If you 'live in terror' of being seen in a bikini...then DON'T WEAR A BIKINI!.
Both of those things just look like they're stuck on and she could do with a bag over her head. I thought The Sun at one time had a campaign against fake boobs?
And now they've gone one step further and have got her to get her kit off and taken photos of her half naked to hammer home the original article. It's all a bit wrong really.
I would hope she is fully aware of the fact they're mocking her and is simply going along with it for the money.. but my worry is she's been led on and actually has no idea what they're doing. Surely she must see they're simply making fun of her?
News it certainly isn't. But I guess she has gone along with it.
Doubtful - she really doesn't seem to have that level of awareness. She's probably still star struck that The Sun have paid for a glamour shoot with her, so she probably thinks it's her 'break' in modelling and that the pots of cash will follow soon afterwards.