It doesn't mean people can't discuss it before hand. If those articles had supported Pa against Kp, we would have been discussing that on those threads.
If people are being advised to settle the case, it would imply that there is some strong evidence to support the action.
I wouldn't say she is blameless... But if it's proven that a hate campaign was set up to ruin her then he is a gutter snipe. She is the mother of his children
I dd happen to watch his show last night, and yes it does refer a lot to his brother. At the end of the day its about PA and his life and that includes his family and his brother. If he and his family wish to discuss it on TV then so be it.
Hopefully he will actually do something positive out of something so tragic, and I am sure it wont be about self promotion that will be a PR disaster but about the cause. PA is actually quite sensible about that
Originally Posted by artlesschaos
If clique means Group of Posters with a Different Opinion to Me, then there are several on here. That is to be expected in threads where there will be three or four sets of opinions floating around.
No, 'clique' means a group of posters bullying someone for saying they wondered why everyone gets so aeriated about PA when he's so bland and boring.
For what it's worth, I think there are times when comments about both of them have crossed the line but lately some of the language used against her has been disgusting, sexist. misogynistic and vile. I am actually embarrassed that any woman would use such ways of speaking about another woman.
Yes, she is vile but dragging yourself down to the gutter in apparent glee to see who can use the worst terms to describe her is sickening to see imo.
IMO, MOST of the posts about him are far more lighthearted and p*sstaking than many of the stuff about her which has become abusive and plain nasty. It's probably the worst I've seen in my 10 years on DS.
Although, after 10 years I shouldn't have to state for the millionth time that I can not stand either of them and, actually, if a gun was put to my head and I was forced to choose, I would say he is marginally preferable. So the inevitable comments about being a closet fan or baiting are not warranted and the last line of a weak defense.
I don't expect everyone to agree but just calling it how I see it.
Anyway, I'm off to the South Coast for a few days so won't be here to respond
No, 'clique' means a group of posters bullying someone for saying they wondered why everyone gets so aeriated about PA when he's so bland and boring.
Posts removed too.
Moving on.......:D
So you have been bullying/baiting too then - as you have had posts removed.
Bullying is not being disagreed with. And cliques (or groups of posters who do not agree with you) are common to all sides of this cube.
Back to Pa, he cannot afford to give up the tv shows, it is the only thing that keeps him going. That is why his oh so private holiday with his girlfriend included a film crew.
So you have been bullying/baiting too then - as you have had posts removed.
Bullying is not being disagreed with. And cliques (or groups of posters who do not agree with you) are common to all sides of this cube.
Back to Pa, he cannot afford to give up the tv shows, it is the only thing that keeps him going. That is why his oh so private holiday with his girlfriend included a film crew.
I watched ‘This Morning’ – good to see Pete trying to respond positively to Andrew’s death by working with Cancer Research to set up a couple of special buses which tour the country where people can be checked to help early detection of cancer. He’s got to raise half a million pounds a year to keep them running so not a trivial undertaking.
As for the alleged ‘hate campaign’, I’ll be very surprised if the case isn’t settled out of court because they both have too much to lose by it all becoming public. Going by the Tugendhat judgement the basis of the case is a 12 page sworn affidavit which Jamelah made to Pete’s solicitor concerning Kate’s relationship with ‘a number of other individuals’ including ‘Mr A’. She provided it to support defamation proceedings he was taking against ‘Now’ over statements attributed to Kate. She later met a ‘News of the World’ journalist to discuss selling a story based on the information but they didn’t publish and other media chose not to publish ‘save to the extent that it had already been made public’ by Kate.
Interestingly her counsel made the point that if Kate’s complaint concerns the accuracy of the information in the affidavit then the appropriate remedy would be to sue for defamation. However that would have the consequence that the law allows a defence of truth which is not available in defence of a privacy claim.
If Pete did instigate or collude with trying to sell stories on Kate – shame on him. But as it was in response to a wide ranging media attack on him by Kate – shame on her too. “A plague on both your houses!” I think the sooner they both recognise that they are linked for life through their shared children, draw a line and put aside the point scoring the better. They’re both in new relationships that they profess to be happy with so why not finally call a truce and attempt to get along for the sake of the children? I agree with Betty that it would be much easier to achieve that if Pete left CAN as I doubt Kate will ever be able to forgive Claire Powell’s role in the whole murky business.
Comments
What did I miss?
It doesn't mean people can't discuss it before hand. If those articles had supported Pa against Kp, we would have been discussing that on those threads.
If people are being advised to settle the case, it would imply that there is some strong evidence to support the action.
What 'hate campaign'?
That's a pretty paranoid view.
I know I shouldn't but that made me :D:D:D
Im not a supporter of eithe KP or PA
I dd happen to watch his show last night, and yes it does refer a lot to his brother. At the end of the day its about PA and his life and that includes his family and his brother. If he and his family wish to discuss it on TV then so be it.
Hopefully he will actually do something positive out of something so tragic, and I am sure it wont be about self promotion that will be a PR disaster but about the cause. PA is actually quite sensible about that
It is 100% certain then that Pete tried to sell pics of a burn to make Katie look like an abusive mother? Did he tell you that?
No, 'clique' means a group of posters bullying someone for saying they wondered why everyone gets so aeriated about PA when he's so bland and boring.
Posts removed too.
Moving on.......:D
and if he saves his own skin in the bargain.... win, win
All I can say is, "Slowly slowly catchy monkey."
Cracks me up too Mr H.
All these people getting so riled up about a monkey........:D
I see it pretty much as you do.
Have a lovely break! x :cool:
Oooh whose goal?
So you have been bullying/baiting too then - as you have had posts removed.
Bullying is not being disagreed with. And cliques (or groups of posters who do not agree with you) are common to all sides of this cube.
Back to Pa, he cannot afford to give up the tv shows, it is the only thing that keeps him going. That is why his oh so private holiday with his girlfriend included a film crew.
To see oursels as others see us!
It wad frae monie a blunder free us,
An' foolish notion.”
― Robert Burns,
Pa has a monkey???:eek:
Operation YouThree.
Maybe the German authorities gave him the one Justin Beiber's left behind?
^^Could not agree with you more,
As a carer?
:D:D:D
As for the alleged ‘hate campaign’, I’ll be very surprised if the case isn’t settled out of court because they both have too much to lose by it all becoming public. Going by the Tugendhat judgement the basis of the case is a 12 page sworn affidavit which Jamelah made to Pete’s solicitor concerning Kate’s relationship with ‘a number of other individuals’ including ‘Mr A’. She provided it to support defamation proceedings he was taking against ‘Now’ over statements attributed to Kate. She later met a ‘News of the World’ journalist to discuss selling a story based on the information but they didn’t publish and other media chose not to publish ‘save to the extent that it had already been made public’ by Kate.
Interestingly her counsel made the point that if Kate’s complaint concerns the accuracy of the information in the affidavit then the appropriate remedy would be to sue for defamation. However that would have the consequence that the law allows a defence of truth which is not available in defence of a privacy claim.
If Pete did instigate or collude with trying to sell stories on Kate – shame on him. But as it was in response to a wide ranging media attack on him by Kate – shame on her too. “A plague on both your houses!” I think the sooner they both recognise that they are linked for life through their shared children, draw a line and put aside the point scoring the better. They’re both in new relationships that they profess to be happy with so why not finally call a truce and attempt to get along for the sake of the children? I agree with Betty that it would be much easier to achieve that if Pete left CAN as I doubt Kate will ever be able to forgive Claire Powell’s role in the whole murky business.