Options
Why wasn't Hazel removed?!
foreveralways
Posts: 537 Forum Member
✭✭
I can see why BB felt the need to remove Daley, but why wasn't Hazel removed as well then?
- she was provoking him
- she held him down AND held a pillow over his face
- she pulled his pants down
I agree he was in the wrong, but so was she. She went along with it all and was cuddling him but as soon as BB called them up on it she turned into the innocent, vurnable girl when in reality she knew exactly what she was doing.
If a man pulled a woman's pants down he would be thrown right out, yet she pulls his pants down and only gets a warning. pathetic.
- she was provoking him
- she held him down AND held a pillow over his face
- she pulled his pants down
I agree he was in the wrong, but so was she. She went along with it all and was cuddling him but as soon as BB called them up on it she turned into the innocent, vurnable girl when in reality she knew exactly what she was doing.
If a man pulled a woman's pants down he would be thrown right out, yet she pulls his pants down and only gets a warning. pathetic.
0
Comments
compare what Daley did to Hazel to what Hazel did to Daley, Daley was way worse :mad:
I don't think it was worse. As soon as BB spoke, he backed off. If he really was aggressive he would off carried on holding her down. Yes, he did over step the mark but i don't think he should of been kicked out. Or at least Hazel should of been as well. If it had stopped at Hazel holding a pillow over Daley's face, BB wouldn't of intervene.
Daley was kicked out not simply because of what he did, he was kicked out because he is male.
Should Hazel have been kicked out for what SHE did and her alone?
He was kicked out because he held another h/m's throat and pinned her to a bed whilst telling her he would finish her. It is an open and shut case. What Hazel did is nothing compared with what Daley did.
It makes no difference. What people are saying is that she provoked him and was involved in it too. So take him out of the equation and there's nothing to discuss. If Hazel and Dan were play fighting with pillows and Hazel took his cover etc that's the best way to look at it IMO. It makes no difference, she deserved a warning yeah, but not removed. It's just cos it's Hazel and no one likes her (me included)
At first she was mucking about but was taken aback by his aggression and threats. But she stood up to him - she didn't cower in a corner - and for that people condemn her.
Boy there are a lot of inadequate people on here completely unable to cope with strong women.
It's not who was worse, the facts are she did hold a pillow over his face, pulled his shorts down & exposed him, put her hand around his throat & kicked him in the balls (well attempted to, couldn't see too well as it was dark).
For what she did, Hazel should have been removed also.
Yes what Hazel did was punishable, but not ejectable. He was clearly being very aggresive, and people saying she provoked him. But Daley was clearly getting aggitated before she entered the SH. He started the play pillowfight. All she did was react to that playfulness!!!!
I am going to be completely honest here. If anyone put a pillow over my face, man or woman, I would kill them.
So you're saying that it's okay for her to hold a pillow over his face and hold him down, and also pull his pants down yet it's absolutely horrific that he held her down BUT as soon as BB started talking he backed away? I genuinely believe people are mistaking him for 'dangerous' because of the image he has. Yes, he did go a little far. But Hazel is in no way innocent. Just because she doesn't look intimidating doesn't mean what she did is acceptable. I'd put my parents house on it that if it was Dexter who did what Daley did, it wouldn't of been seen as aggressive. Daley looks intimidating, which in effect was probably his biggest downfall.
She looked pretty weak on that diary room chair trying to get him thrown out.
Shes certainly guilty of all three. Ok she wasnt as bad overall as Daley, but this isnt about comparisons its simply about judging Hazels behavior and its was distasteful. Had she behaved like that in the real word the outcome of such events might have been much more dangerous, she needs to realize their are repercussions from her actions.
The bit I find most hypocritical is her removing his boxers, had Daley pulled her knickers down without consent on live TV then he wouldve been removed and every women int he country would be baying for him.
Exactly - totally agree. What an absolutely disgusting man - pinning a woman down and threatening her - 'Pipe down and go to sleep now, understand? Don't f' with me, do you understand - before I nut you one'. This wasn't playing, this was just nasty and scary - the whole thing would probably have got much worse had Big Brother not intervened (though I agree, they should have stepped in a lot quicker)
Daley's not fit to be out on the streets - let alone in the Big Brother house.
It isnt anything to do with Gina, Hazel shouldnt have encouraged him when he was getting overly aggressive saying go on then, or I like aggressive men, and she certainly shouldnt be exposing his genitalia on national tv without consent either. Im not saying to remove her but had he done that the least he wouldve receive is a warning. Thats not excusing him, as hes an aggressive dog, but she isnt all innocent either.
Okay so if she was so "scared" why cuddle him and sleep in the same bed as him after all that?
I hope so
If he pulled her knickers down that would be deemed as being worse.. Why is it okay for her to pull his down?