Look - if she had announced her pregnancy, stayed out of the limelight and hadn't done more of her tacky book promoting stuff, hadn't started off speculation about it being twins (coy references to "babies" and there being a reason for her bump being so big), hadn't made any reference to how far gone she was, hadn't made comments about having had a feeling there would be a drama surrounding the birth etc etc then no one would be asking any questions. She must have known it wasn't twins but even recently she was talking about the "babies". She is a lying liar who lies.
^^^
This!
I long ago gave up trying to work out what was truth and what was lies, and I suspect a lot of other people have done the same. Why bother giving anything she says the time of day, when she can't even be bothered to give an honest, straightforward answer to even the simplest question?
Lexi if she was 4 weeks pregnant when she got married her baby would of been due approx 18th sept...
My mistake, Betty, I thought she got married in Jan, not Feb. But the month she married is immaterial and makes no difference to my belief that she found out she was pregnant in Dec with the baby due in Aug. So, not premature.
Soft porn :rolleyes:
I believe baby was approx 4-6 weeks early ... And no I don't think she was lying... Just says things to get noticed..and judging from the who har on here IT WORKED
Yes, soft porn, gross and cheap and tacky. Like her.
Let's get this right, you believe the baby is 4-6 weeks early, she's telling all it was 8 weeks (so she can sell her son and this stinking story to the shittiest rag around with added dwama)....and she isn't lying!!!
How low can this skank go in selling a child to the highest and probable only bidder - the entire sorry saga is a money making scam, from the get go including Kev and the worst of it all is she has and continues to expose her children to her money grabbing desperate ways.
How on earth any one can suggest she put's her children first is utterly beyond me.
Because its her job? The goal is keeping the things she wants to keep private, private.
A bit like the pregnancy bump that she swore no one would ever see because she was keeping it private,she soon changed her mind when they got the cheque book out.
My mistake, Betty, I thought she got married in Jan, not Feb. But the month she married is immaterial and makes no difference to my belief that she found out she was pregnant in Dec with the baby due in Aug. So, not premature.
She got pregnant approx 19th Dec... Which will of made her approx 3/4 weeks pregnant when she got married.. By 19th June ( when she did interview) she will of been approx 26/27weeks pregnant ...
Which would of made her due date at 40 weeks approx 18th Sept
She got pregnant approx 19th Dec... Which will of made her approx 3/4 weeks pregnant when she got married.. By 19th June ( when she did interview) she will of been approx 26/27weeks pregnant ...
Which would of made her due date at 40 weeks approx 18th Sept
She never gave a date ...so tell me when she lied???
I've been reading this thread but not normally bothered about her enough to post but she did say she was in her thrid trimester when she clearly wasn't or the rest was a lie if the above was true. The things she has said are clearly mutually exclusive and not compatible and that seems indisputable.
She got pregnant approx 19th Dec... Which will of made her approx 3/4 weeks pregnant when she got married.. By 19th June ( when she did interview) she will of been approx 26/27weeks pregnant ...
Which would of made her due date at 40 weeks approx 18th Sept
Surely that means he wasn't 8 weeks premature then.
She got pregnant approx 19th Dec... Which will of made her approx 3/4 weeks pregnant when she got married.. By 19th June ( when she did interview) she will of been approx 26/27weeks pregnant ...
Which would of made her due date at 40 weeks approx 18th Sept
As I said, Betty, I don't believe the baby was 8wks premature. No list of dates can change that. Let's leave it there, eh.
She never gave a date ...so tell me when she lied???
OK
1. She stated on live TV mid June that she was third trimester and due soon. Fact- I've posted the link. So she was MINIMUM 28 weeks at that point.
2. Baby was born mid August and was announced as being 8 weeks prem.
3. If she had been 28 weeks at the time of the interview (which was roughly eight weeks before the birth) then Jett would have been four weeks prem,
Ergo she was lying either at the time of the interview or the time of the birth. Is that simple enough for you? Even you are now speculating a due date of 18th September which would make him about 4 weeks prem!
As I said, Betty, I don't believe the baby was 8wks premature. No list of dates can change that. Let's leave it there, eh.
As you know I've also said I believe he was 4-6 weeks early not 8 ... But the dates add up to what she has said..it's just that some don't want it to add up... Let's not forget some claimed she wasn't pregnant at all
As you know I've also said I believe he was 4-6 weeks early not 8 ... But the dates add up to what she has said..it's just that some don't want it to add up... Let's not forget some claimed she wasn't pregnant at all
They don't add up to 8 weeks prem which is what the whole dramalama as reported to the Sun was about!!! So if you now believe she was about 34/36 weeks then why would she decide to go on a road trip if she was that far gone with a difficult pregnancy?
OK
1. She stated on live TV mid June that she was third trimester and due soon. Fact- I've posted the link. So she was MINIMUM 28 weeks at that point.
2. Baby was born mid August and was announced as being 8 weeks prem.
3. If she had been 28 weeks at the time of the interview (which was roughly eight weeks before the birth) then Jett would have been four weeks prem,
Ergo she was lying either at the time of the interview or the time of the birth. Is that simple enough for you?
Point 1 so she was a week away from her 3rd trimester :rolleyes:
Point 2 .. Her son was born approx 14/15 august and as I've said I think he was 4-6 weeks early
Point 3 see point 1 and proves my post in point 2
It was an interview with her and they are her main press employers. I'm sure she would have been prattling on Twitter if she had been misquoted on something so fundamental.
As you know I've also said I believe he was 4-6 weeks early not 8 ... But the dates add up to what she has said..it's just that some don't want it to add up... Let's not forget some claimed she wasn't pregnant at all
In what way do the dates add up On 1st May she said she was over half way through (?? 20 weeks+?) by 19th June she was in third trimester... - she had the baby 15 weeks later, making it around 35 weeks. Not 8 weeks prem then.
In what way do the dates add up On 1st May she said she was over half way through (?? 20 weeks+?) by 19th June she was in third trimester... - she had the baby 15 weeks later, making it around 35 weeks. Not 8 weeks prem then.
I think Betty concedes that the dates do not add up but it woz the Sun wot done it. Not our whiter than white Pwincess Katie.
Comments
^^^
This!
I long ago gave up trying to work out what was truth and what was lies, and I suspect a lot of other people have done the same. Why bother giving anything she says the time of day, when she can't even be bothered to give an honest, straightforward answer to even the simplest question?
My mistake, Betty, I thought she got married in Jan, not Feb. But the month she married is immaterial and makes no difference to my belief that she found out she was pregnant in Dec with the baby due in Aug. So, not premature.
Then her baby would of been born in June :rolleyes:
Good.
Yes, soft porn, gross and cheap and tacky. Like her.
Let's get this right, you believe the baby is 4-6 weeks early, she's telling all it was 8 weeks (so she can sell her son and this stinking story to the shittiest rag around with added dwama)....and she isn't lying!!!
How low can this skank go in selling a child to the highest and probable only bidder - the entire sorry saga is a money making scam, from the get go including Kev and the worst of it all is she has and continues to expose her children to her money grabbing desperate ways.
How on earth any one can suggest she put's her children first is utterly beyond me.
So she's a professional lying liar who lies then.
She got pregnant approx 19th Dec... Which will of made her approx 3/4 weeks pregnant when she got married.. By 19th June ( when she did interview) she will of been approx 26/27weeks pregnant ...
Which would of made her due date at 40 weeks approx 18th Sept
So classy :rolleyes:
That would make ALL celebs LIARS then
Why? Do all celebs lie about their due dates then?
She never gave a date ...so tell me when she lied???
I've been reading this thread but not normally bothered about her enough to post but she did say she was in her thrid trimester when she clearly wasn't or the rest was a lie if the above was true. The things she has said are clearly mutually exclusive and not compatible and that seems indisputable.
Surely that means he wasn't 8 weeks premature then.
As I said, Betty, I don't believe the baby was 8wks premature. No list of dates can change that. Let's leave it there, eh.
OK
1. She stated on live TV mid June that she was third trimester and due soon. Fact- I've posted the link. So she was MINIMUM 28 weeks at that point.
2. Baby was born mid August and was announced as being 8 weeks prem.
3. If she had been 28 weeks at the time of the interview (which was roughly eight weeks before the birth) then Jett would have been four weeks prem,
Ergo she was lying either at the time of the interview or the time of the birth. Is that simple enough for you? Even you are now speculating a due date of 18th September which would make him about 4 weeks prem!
As you know I've also said I believe he was 4-6 weeks early not 8 ... But the dates add up to what she has said..it's just that some don't want it to add up... Let's not forget some claimed she wasn't pregnant at all
They don't add up to 8 weeks prem which is what the whole dramalama as reported to the Sun was about!!! So if you now believe she was about 34/36 weeks then why would she decide to go on a road trip if she was that far gone with a difficult pregnancy?
Point 1 so she was a week away from her 3rd trimester :rolleyes:
Point 2 .. Her son was born approx 14/15 august and as I've said I think he was 4-6 weeks early
Point 3 see point 1 and proves my post in point 2
Well it's the scum... I rest my case
It was an interview with her and they are her main press employers. I'm sure she would have been prattling on Twitter if she had been misquoted on something so fundamental.
In what way do the dates add up
I think Betty concedes that the dates do not add up but it woz the Sun wot done it. Not our whiter than white Pwincess Katie.