Options

Peter Andre (part 3)

15556586061122

Comments

  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 245
    Forum Member
    NotaTypo wrote: »
    They also must check out of town gardening centres and car parks to see if the private girlfriend of a z-lister might just be around at that exact moment. Or they've been informed in advance by the person or their managment...


    "At FameFlynet we have a PR department that specialises in working directly with celebrities and their agents. We work hand in hand with our clients to achieve maximum press coverage in national newspapers and magazines. Our achievements in this market place are unprecedented compared to other picture agencies.

    We pay agents and Celebrities directly from all sales generated from the pictures we work on]

    http://www.fameflynet.biz/

    To be fair this is nothing new, Victoria Beckham was infamous for tipping off the press about 10 years ago. Although, I agree, the garden centre pictures took this practice to a new low!
  • Options
    Blondie XBlondie X Posts: 28,662
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    To be fair this is nothing new, Victoria Beckham was infamous for tipping off the press about 10 years ago. Although, I agree, the garden centre pictures took this practice to a new low!

    Have a look in the staged photo's thread if you want to see some real lows :)
  • Options
    GORTONIANGORTONIAN Posts: 8,673
    Forum Member
    On the subject of press being tipped off there's at least a couple of celebs and I use that term very loosely who bring their own
    I've forgotten her name at the moment but one of the Towie stars decided to visit her local takeaway with a photographer in tow
    This non event was witnessed by a regular listener to Steve Allens early breakfast show on lbc radio who lost no time telling his listeners about it

    And if you think we rip loves his kids toss toss and Kkkaty and co to pieces on here you've never heard Steve in full flow an excellent listen
  • Options
    Blondie XBlondie X Posts: 28,662
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    GORTONIAN wrote: »
    On the subject of press being tipped off there's at least a couple of celebs and I use that term very loosely who bring their own
    I've forgotten her name at the moment but one of the Towie stars decided to visit her local takeaway with a photographer in tow
    This non event was witnessed by a regular listener to Steve Allens early breakfast show on lbc radio who lost no time telling his listeners about it

    And if you think we rip loves his kids toss toss and Kkkaty and co on here you've never heard Steve in full flow an excellent listen

    That was Chantelle.

    My mate lives in Brentwood as she's seen Joey Essex, Chantelle and Gemma all pull up with a photographer in the passenger seat. She often sees paps hanging round the high street looking at their watches so they've obviously been told to be ther at a certain time.

    I've also got a DM article where her son's football team was sponsored by Amy Childs. The kids were playing over the fields then several cars pulled up and photographers got out followed by Amy. She then proceeded to pose kicking a ball then with the kids, didn't speak to anyone at all and then shot off again within a 5 minute window. It was in the DM SOS that afternoon dressed up as Amy spending a whole morning playing with the kids. I'll get her to send me the link :)
  • Options
    Daisy BennybootsDaisy Bennyboots Posts: 18,375
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Peter Andre and Emily use both a babycarrier car seat and a pram. I'm not going to post the picture of the pram because there are lots of Juniors friends in the picture and it's an invasion of the privacy of his classmates. But there is the carrier:

    http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/05/27/article-2640582-1E3E4E4E00000578-528_634x851.jpg

    PAwas obviously paid to promote a baby sling, fair enough - every pap will tell you that parents holding or playing with their children are more sought after and give out a more 'caring. perfect' image of the parent that the client wishes to portray.

    Finally...
    The Bristol University graduate cradled Amelia to her chest and shielded her gaze from the cameras
    Give me a forking break. If you wanted to shield your baby from the press don't follow daddy around a work when you know the press camp out - i.e the back of the ITV studio (they would be tipped off anyway). What is the point of parading your baby in front of the media...then sheltering your baby from them? Oh yes - the tell the world what a cracking mummy you are. I know people that worship z-listery without questioning are quite gullible but there is no need to treat them like morons.
  • Options
    GORTONIANGORTONIAN Posts: 8,673
    Forum Member
    Blondie X wrote: »
    That was Chantelle.

    My mate lives in Brentwood as she's seen Joey Essex, Chantelle and Gemma all pull up with a photographer in the passenger seat. She often sees paps hanging round the high street looking at their watches so they've obviously been told to be ther at a certain time.

    I've also got a DM article where her son's football team was sponsored by Amy Childs. The kids were playing over the fields then several cars pulled up and photographers got out followed by Amy. She then proceeded to pose kicking a ball then with the kids, didn't speak to anyone at all and then shot off again within a 5 minute window. It was in the DM SOS that afternoon dressed up as Amy spending a whole morning playing with the kids. I'll get her to send me the link :)

    Thanks Blondie indeed it was😄

    By the way for those who don't listen to Steve we call Ems toss toss due to her habit of constantly. Tossing her hair and that's all ...😳🙀

    I'm still interested to see what will happen now Rylan is on CANS books
    As has already been noted he and Mr Andrex will be no doubt slugging it out for attention from St Clare and presenting jobs
    Whether Ryan will be reporting back to his very good friend KP about the former DOTY's forthcoming projects is worth speculating about
    It will make the tit for tat twitter and media war they have with each other even more entertaining
    I forecast more 'intimate private ' photo shoots though as he gets increasingly desperate
  • Options
    GORTONIANGORTONIAN Posts: 8,673
    Forum Member
    Peter Andre and Emily use both a babycarrier car seat and a pram. I'm not going to post the picture of the pram because there are lots of Juniors friends in the picture and it's an invasion of the privacy of his classmates. But there is the carrier:

    http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/05/27/article-2640582-1E3E4E4E00000578-528_634x851.jpg

    PAwas obviously paid to promote a baby sling, fair enough - every pap will tell you that parents holding or playing with their children are more sought after and give out a more 'caring. perfect' image of the parent that the client wishes to portray.

    Finally...Give me a forking break. If you wanted to shield your baby from the press don't follow daddy around a work when you know the press camp out - i.e the back of the ITV studio (they would be tipped off anyway). What is the point of parading your baby in front of the media...then sheltering your baby from them? Oh yes - the tell the world what a cracking mummy you are. I know people that worship z-listery without questioning are quite gullible but there is no need to treat them like morons.

    I'm waiting to see if they will have the poor little mite scribbling on bits of paper for his fan at his public appearances as soon as she can toddle 😳
    He already has Junior and Bister posing and signing if I remember rightly ?
  • Options
    Azura's StarAzura's Star Posts: 3,190
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    GORTONIAN wrote: »
    I'm waiting to see if they will have the poor little mite scribbling on bits of paper for his fan at his public appearances as soon as she can toddle 😳
    He already has Junior and Bister posing and signing if I remember rightly ?



    Yes, you're right.
    I believe that Princess accompanied Tangoman to a shopping centre on one of his pong-flogging extravaganzas, and not only signed autographs, but was pawed at by numerous Tangofans.
    According to some people, this was absolutely fine because her doting Daddy was just giving the fans what they wanted, and lucky Princess was spending quality time with the ex-DOTY.
    Signing autographs.
    And being touched by strangers.
    She's a little girl.
    >:(
    @ing scuzzbucket.

    And the very private Emily not only signed up for this, she signed her baby up as well.
  • Options
    BelaBela Posts: 2,568
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Peter Andre and Emily use both a babycarrier car seat and a pram. I'm not going to post the picture of the pram because there are lots of Juniors friends in the picture and it's an invasion of the privacy of his classmates. But there is the carrier:

    http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/05/27/article-2640582-1E3E4E4E00000578-528_634x851.jpg

    PAwas obviously paid to promote a baby sling, fair enough - every pap will tell you that parents holding or playing with their children are more sought after and give out a more 'caring. perfect' image of the parent that the client wishes to portray.

    Finally...Give me a forking break. If you wanted to shield your baby from the press don't follow daddy around a work when you know the press camp out - i.e the back of the ITV studio (they would be tipped off anyway). What is the point of parading your baby in front of the media...then sheltering your baby from them? Oh yes - the tell the world what a cracking mummy you are. I know people that worship z-listery without questioning are quite gullible but there is no need to treat them like morons.

    ^BIB Totally. It's not the pics per se that bother me (zelebs will do what zelebs will do), it's the accompanying sickly, sycophantic, nauseating CAN-generated 'caring hands-on private parents' tosh.

    Although this - http://i3.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article3916685.ece/alternates/s615b/Peter-Andre-with-his-fiance-Emily-MacDonagh-and-daughter-Amelia.jpg - did make me laugh. The expressions on Emily and Amelia's faces is SO not in tune with the accompanying narrative which is full of 'caring loving awww private awww doty aww aww aww f*ckwittery.

    I particularly love the expression on Amelia's face. ;-)
  • Options
    BelaBela Posts: 2,568
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    GORTONIAN wrote: »
    You mean a bit like the testcard????😳

    :D A bit but not. Isn't the testcard used to judge image quality? How would we ever know if the colour setting was correct? ;-)
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 1,170
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Blondie X wrote: »
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2705891/Doting-father-Peter-Andre-heads-fianc-e-Emily-MacDonagh-six-month-old-baby-Amelia.html

    Why does the media fawn all over the cheesy buffoon? That article sounds like it was written by Mills and Boon

    *Hey, just realised I might have just written a TM standard song in my post :D

    Well that photo kind off sums it up :D
    Mcdonawho the misery :cry:
    She forgot to shield meal tickets face? Have to be careful for the next exclusive shoot.
    She forgot to do the cheesy grin?
    Didn't toss:cry: the hair properly?
    Forgot she was wearing primark?
    Suddenly dawned on her she might have to work for a living?
    Poor little meal ticket :cry: daddy did I earn enough to have a pair of socks?
  • Options
    HmmbopHmmbop Posts: 2,099
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    It seems Peter has started a disturbing trend. Now the Beckham's are exploiting their children by being photographed out and about with them. And look poor little Harper is shoe-less and not in a pushchair!!!!

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2706930/Victoria-Beckham-son-Brooklyn-sport-matching-fluorescent-trainers-leave-spin-class-David-Harper.html

    The Beckhams don't need to use their children to make their money. David was a very talented footballer in his day, and along with sponsorship deals over the years, he's made for life. VB was in one of the most successful pop acts of all time and now makes her money by designing very expensive dresses which A listers are falling over themselves to wear.

    Most of the pics I see are of the Beckham family traipsing through airports.

    To compare TM to the Beckhams, even in jest, is laughable.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 245
    Forum Member
    Hmmbop wrote: »
    The Beckhams don't need to use their children to make their money. David was a very talented footballer in his day, and along with sponsorship deals over the years, he's made for life. VB was in one of the most successful pop acts of all time and now makes her money by designing very expensive dresses which A listers are falling over themselves to wear.

    Most of the pics I see are of the Beckham family traipsing through airports.

    To compare TM to the Beckhams, even in jest, is laughable.

    Brand Beckham is based almost entirely on their wholesome family image. Victoria is generally not seen as likeable and David (although he's got a bit better with lots of training) is inarticulate. It's their family image that has helped propel them to become a super couple. They are extremely wealthy now but their kids/ family helped them get there!

    They don't need to do it now, but they have also had their fair share of OK covers (many featuring their kids) over the years. Not to mention one of the little boys modelling - I can only imagine the outcry if Pete let Junior do this!

    I also note you have ignored my comment about Harper being carried/ shoeless and yet it was the crime of the century on here when it was baby Amelia!
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 1,170
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Yes, you're right.
    I believe that Princess accompanied Tangoman to a shopping centre on one of his pong-flogging extravaganzas, and not only signed autographs, but was pawed at by numerous Tangofans.
    According to some people, this was absolutely fine because her doting Daddy was just giving the fans what they wanted, and lucky Princess was spending quality time with the ex-DOTY.
    Signing autographs.
    And being touched by strangers.
    She's a little girl.
    >:(
    @ing scuzzbucket.

    And the very private Emily not only signed up for this, she signed her baby up as well.
    Bleurgh, that really is disgusting. It's a parents duty to protect your children, not sell them off like lumps of meat.
    What if one of those fans turned out to be a bit too obsessive >:( why would anyone want a small child's autograph.
    As for that Emily, she is getting just as bad as him and the sooner she disappears the better.
  • Options
    HmmbopHmmbop Posts: 2,099
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Brand Beckham is based almost entirely on their wholesome family image. Victoria is generally not seen as likeable and David (although he's got a bit better with lots of training) is inarticulate. It's their family image that has helped propel them to become a super couple. They are extremely wealthy now but their kids/ family helped them get there!

    They don't need to do it now, but they have also had their fair share of OK covers (many featuring their kids) over the years. Not to mention one of the little boys modelling - I can only imagine the outcry if Pete let Junior do this!

    I also note you have ignored my comment about Harper being carried/ shoeless and yet it was the crime of the century on here when it was baby Amelia!

    VB made enough money from the SG to live like a queen for the rest of her life. Same with DB and his sponsorship deals over the years - for the worlds biggest and most well known Brands. Usually to do with his talent or his good looks, not his children. Not sure why you mention being inarticulate, he has always came across as a lovely and super nice guy, so being perceived as the brain of Britain wasn't something he probably felt the need to portray. He had plenty of other redeeming qualities. Not sure who says VB is unlikeable? The red tops say so? Oh it must be true as they speak for the whole country!! I'm sure she's really bothered;-)

    And when they did the OK covers years ago, that was at a time when they were actually seen as big, credible celebrities. Unlike now, when some two bit, talentless, orange media **** who loves money and will use his kids to make as much of it as possible makes the cover 5 times in as many months. Not fussy if Junior begins to model. I wouldn't expect anything less. And I equally wasn't bothered that Romeo started modelling. Makes no odds to me.

    Who said it was the crime of the century? It was merely commented on. Looks to me like the little one is being carried by her big brother as her shoes have been left elsewhere. I doubt she left the house shoeless, whilst the rest of her family had shoes on :p she's also getting a bit big for a pram. And maybe they were just going on a short walk from a building to a waiting car;-) Seems that would be an acceptable and logical explanation;-)
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 1,170
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Hmmbop wrote: »
    The Beckhams don't need to use their children to make their money. David was a very talented footballer in his day, and along with sponsorship deals over the years, he's made for life. VB was in one of the most successful pop acts of all time and now makes her money by designing very expensive dresses which A listers are falling over themselves to wear.

    Most of the pics I see are of the Beckham family traipsing through airports.

    To compare TM to the Beckhams, even in jest, is laughable.
    That's hilarious, comparing the Beckhams to that gimp Andre.
    Anyway I'm sure the anti Beckhams can pop along and start a thread.
    I forgot to tell you the concert at Epsom, there was a poster of Andre and seems like were not the only people that don't like him. I can't repeat what was said, but the air was a bit blue.
    Hope you had a nice holiday by the way.
  • Options
    NotaTypoNotaTypo Posts: 4,253
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Hmmbop wrote: »
    The Beckhams don't need to use their children to make their money. David was a very talented footballer in his day, and along with sponsorship deals over the years, he's made for life. VB was in one of the most successful pop acts of all time and now makes her money by designing very expensive dresses which A listers are falling over themselves to wear.

    Most of the pics I see are of the Beckham family traipsing through airports.

    To compare TM to the Beckhams, even in jest, is laughable.
    I can't imagine Posh'n'Becks selling family trips to Homebase. Despite not pimping their kids' birthday parties etc out for profit, I'm pretty sure the Beckhams love their kids as much as ex-DOTY does.
  • Options
    BelaBela Posts: 2,568
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Brand Beckham is based almost entirely on their wholesome family image. Victoria is generally not seen as likeable and David (although he's got a bit better with lots of training) is inarticulate. It's their family image that has helped propel them to become a super couple. They are extremely wealthy now but their kids/ family helped them get there!

    They don't need to do it now, but they have also had their fair share of OK covers (many featuring their kids) over the years. Not to mention one of the little boys modelling - I can only imagine the outcry if Pete let Junior do this!

    I also note you have ignored my comment about Harper being carried/ shoeless and yet it was the crime of the century on here when it was baby Amelia!

    Coul.d you direct me to the 'crime of the century' posts please so I can see for myself the outrage that you apparently saw on here.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 245
    Forum Member
    Kat_12 wrote: »
    My mother works with people who are friends of hers, but she doesn't drag us all to work for a "catch-up". Since when is Gino a good friend of Emily's? Or even Andre's? Or are you going by the z-lister standard of friendship? As in they may have met briefly once?

    Look around you the next time you're out - see how many babies Amelia's age are being constantly carried around by their mothers. I certainly wasn't at that age, and neither are any of the babies I know. For any more than a very short distance, they go in a pram, otherwise the parents only have one arm free and would get pretty tired after a while. Babies aren't light.

    On this particular day, Emily was probably only going to the car so fair enough, but what about all the other times they've been "accidentally" papped? Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I've never seen them anywhere near a pram. Even while allegedly on proper "days out" when even Earth Mother Emily would undoubtedly get sick of carrying her all day.

    This is a good example, Bela. Emily's decision to carry her little one seemed to be seen as very controversial by some. The vast majority of pictures show Harper Beckham being carried but apparently this is totally different. I'm sure if it was Amelia there would be cries of 'why isn't she walking herself or in a buggy?'
  • Options
    Azura's StarAzura's Star Posts: 3,190
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I honestly don't give a shiny one whether Amelia is being carried or is in a pushchair.
    I equally don't care whether she's wearing shoes or not.
    What I find utterly despicable is the fact that despite their protestations to the contrary before she was born, her parents are more than happy to hawk her around in an attempt to prolong her father's career.
    And before anyone tries to argue with this, ask yourselves why Amelia's publicity shy mother didn't ask for her daughter's face to be pixelated to protect her privacy.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 245
    Forum Member
    I honestly don't give a shiny one whether Amelia is being carried or is in a pushchair.
    I equally don't care whether she's wearing shoes or not.
    What I find utterly despicable is the fact that despite their protestations to the contrary before she was born, her parents are more than happy to hawk her around in an attempt to prolong her father's career.
    And before anyone tries to argue with this, ask yourselves why Amelia's publicity shy mother didn't ask for her daughter's face to be pixelated to protect her privacy.

    That I can agree with! I've always admired Kate Moss for protecting her daughter in this way.
  • Options
    JerrybobJerrybob Posts: 1,685
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Kat_12 wrote: »
    My mother works with people who are friends of hers, but she doesn't drag us all to work for a "catch-up". Since when is Gino a good friend of Emily's? Or even Andre's? Or are you going by the z-lister standard of friendship? As in they may have met briefly once?

    Look around you the next time you're out - see how many babies Amelia's age are being constantly carried around by their mothers. I certainly wasn't at that age, and neither are any of the babies I know. For any more than a very short distance, they go in a pram, otherwise the parents only have one arm free and would get pretty tired after a while. Babies aren't light.

    On this particular day, Emily was probably only going to the car so fair enough, but what about all the other times they've been "accidentally" papped? Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I've never seen them anywhere near a pram. Even while allegedly on proper "days out" when even Earth Mother Emily would undoubtedly get sick of carrying her all day.

    They are very good friends - the Andres and Gino and his family. Thought you would have known that, given that people here seem such experts on every aspect of Pete's life and relationships ;-)
  • Options
    HmmbopHmmbop Posts: 2,099
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I honestly don't give a shiny one whether Amelia is being carried or is in a pushchair.
    I equally don't care whether she's wearing shoes or not.
    What I find utterly despicable is the fact that despite their protestations to the contrary before she was born, her parents are more than happy to hawk her around in an attempt to prolong her father's career.
    And before anyone tries to argue with this, ask yourselves why Amelia's publicity shy mother didn't ask for her daughter's face to be pixelated to protect her privacy.

    Yup, if they were truly sincere about all their false declarations and mere lip service re: privacy, it would be pretty easy to ask for Amelia's face to be pixelated, but then what would would happen when they do the OK! Shoots? Don't think OK! would be prepared to pay the big bucks if they couldn't publish their 'exclusive pics' of the family Andre in Dubai and Amelia with her face pixelated.
  • Options
    JerrybobJerrybob Posts: 1,685
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Hmmbop wrote: »
    VB made enough money from the SG to live like a queen for the rest of her life. Same with DB and his sponsorship deals over the years - for the worlds biggest and most well known Brands. Usually to do with his talent or his good looks, not his children. Not sure why you mention being inarticulate, he has always came across as a lovely and super nice guy, so being perceived as the brain of Britain wasn't something he probably felt the need to portray. He had plenty of other redeeming qualities. Not sure who says VB is unlikeable? The red tops say so? Oh it must be true as they speak for the whole country!! I'm sure she's really bothered;-)

    And when they did the OK covers years ago, that was at a time when they were actually seen as big, credible celebrities. Unlike now, when some two bit, talentless, orange media **** who loves money and will use his kids to make as much of it as possible makes the cover 5 times in as many months. Not fussy if Junior begins to model. I wouldn't expect anything less. And I equally wasn't bothered that Romeo started modelling. Makes no odds to me.

    Who said it was the crime of the century? It was merely commented on. Looks to me like the little one is being carried by her big brother as her shoes have been left elsewhere. I doubt she left the house shoeless, whilst the rest of her family had shoes on :p she's also getting a bit big for a pram. And maybe they were just going on a short walk from a building to a waiting car;-) Seems that would be an acceptable and logical explanation;-)


    A bit like Emily and Amelia - oh wait.........
  • Options
    HmmbopHmmbop Posts: 2,099
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Jerrybob wrote: »
    A bit like Emily and Amelia - oh wait.........

    Oh dear. You obvs didn't get it. Even though I added the little wink. Oh well.:blush:

    Anyway I'm bored out of my brain discussing the ins and outs of who wears shoes, in what capacity and at what time. So I think I'll bow out of this particular conversation now before I nod off at the ipad.
This discussion has been closed.