It is true, and it's been very noticeable for many years.
We've had panel members supporting Helen, for example, whilst the other panelists rip her apart.
Neither was the approved line at the time.
You know, maybe opinions of Chris would be nicer if... you know, he didn't act like a creep to begin with? You can hardly blame the audience/panel for thinking that.
And yet there's been a noticeable change in the audience view, along with Emma's. Very convenient that they're suddenly more positive about Chris just was Emma's taken a similar turn.
And yet there's been a noticeable change in the audience view, along with Emma's. Very convenient that they're suddenly more positive about Chris just was Emma's taken a similar turn.
Because they are protecting themselves because the consensus was that they went too far. It does not mean that they don't believe that, and it certainly doesn't mean that Chris isn't acting like a creep.
Because they are protecting themselves because the consensus was that they went too far. It does not mean that they don't believe that, and it certainly doesn't mean that Chris isn't acting like a creep.
1. It doesn't mean that who doesn't believe what?
2. Of course that doesn't mean he isn't acting like a creep. What means he's not actingl like a creep is that he's not acting like a creep.
Comments
It is true, and it's been very noticeable for many years.
Neither was the approved line at the time.
And yet there's been a noticeable change in the audience view, along with Emma's. Very convenient that they're suddenly more positive about Chris just was Emma's taken a similar turn.
Oh yes.
But probably shaped to fit the narrative rather than the true information from the outside
Because they are protecting themselves because the consensus was that they went too far. It does not mean that they don't believe that, and it certainly doesn't mean that Chris isn't acting like a creep.
One of them is currently in the audience wearing a white short sleeved shirt and gurning at the camera - just behind Emma
Linda Nolan
Steve-O
You can. 60 is 120% of 50, for example.
Exactly. Unemployed actors.
Which came first: selection for the focus group, or appearing in the audience.
And why weren't some of the regular regulars there?
https://twitter.com/balfourUK/status/494614625183612928
1. It doesn't mean that who doesn't believe what?
2. Of course that doesn't mean he isn't acting like a creep. What means he's not actingl like a creep is that he's not acting like a creep.
I can only hope so in order to see some shocked faces.
However those numpties on BB are inferring that they are pushing beyond the 100 of the percent and going beyond that limit (hence 110% or more).
So whilst I agree with your statement I disagree with theirs