Chris & Christopher both sitting alongside Ashleigh - her friends - their votes apparently 'jumped' on to Helen in droves and swung it...
Especially Christopher, who was second favourite, and Irish, the Irish voted Helen instead of Ashleigh, heehee - must've been her charming disposition, ummmm!
Are we seriously meant to believe this, huge turn around in votes, this wasn't BB viewers voting and that's the problem.
I knew Pauline didn't know that she was giving Helen a pass to the final....but then had she chosen someone else to get the reward...would it have been a pass to the final? Probably not ;-)
Thankyou Erin for posting this, good to see the exact margins between the hms, was a huge swing towards Helen during the live final, thats when she won.
I knew Pauline didn't know that she was giving Helen a pass to the final....but then had she chosen someone else to get the reward...would it have been a pass to the final? Probably not ;-)[/QUOTE
what the hell do channel 5 have to gain from Helen winning other than a headache from idiotic fans behaving like children who havent got their own way?
There's so much wrong with that explanation I don't know where to start.
1. It fails to address the underlying issue of severe bias in editing and production process of the entire series.
2. The numbers don't add up.
3. Pauline knew who she was giving the pass to, she didn't know what the punishments and rewards were for Mark and Matthew.
4. The fact Ashleigh was ahead by a load up until the final vote where some how Helen made up the vote difference just to draw even and then continue to keep up with Ashleigh and surpassing her.
5. Where is the justification for keeping Helen in after so many warnings by formal and informal? One Housemate made a racist mark once and was immediately kicked out, Daley made an aggressive act and was kicked out, Helen make religious insults and physical insults and moves numerous times and she stayed in.
"13. In Helen’s case, the broadcasts twice showed her being reprimanded by Big Brother for her conduct (in relation to Danielle and Matthew). There were a number of further informal interventions with Helen about her conduct and during the course of the material broadcast Helen herself made reference to some of these, although these informal interventions were not themselves included in any broadcast. Informal interventions with other housemates, similarly, were not included in the material broadcast."
Im confused? BBOTS sho aired her being warned about her verbalised threat to smash in Ashleighs face,this is way after Matt and Dan left?? Was that just an intervention?
Dont aired stuff on BBOTS count? Dosent the fact it was aired mean by thier own words that it was formal?
Which scenario was edited to inaccurately reflect the status of the house?
Helen being the only one of the final few to have been privvy to Diary room conversation and yet the final Power HM gave her it again - reinforcing a perceived notion this time that she had changed. The reintroduction of the HMs - caused a 180° change in direction obviously linked.
Helen's road to change and the countless unscreened interventions from BB
The sudden change in BOTS opinions days before the final appearing completely contrived.
The voting numbers of Helen being 100k, yet she had more than 131k more votes than Pav...
I feel that there is something wrong, but acknwoledge that it could simply be a perception and not even BB's fault. I feel that trust has been lost and OFCOM could either confirm our fears or vindicate BB.
Surely this is a win/win situation for Big Brother as it itself says, it is above board.
Helen being the only one of the final few to have been privvy to Diary room conversation and yet the final Power HM gave her it again - reinforcing a perceived notion this time that she had changed.
You may be talking about something different and if so I apologise.but no they didn't. Big Brother chose her to be fake evicted, it had nothing to do with the power HM.
And in the Final Week when she was behind and long odds to win, she was 'selected' to be one of the HMs to be fake evicted - and her odds tumble immediately from 33/1 to about 7/1....hmmmm! :eek:
There were two Power HMs that week, why didn't they pick one HM each to go...
Why did BB feel the need to say the 'public' evicted' Helen.
So then it was like a road to redemption.
She was sat downstairs, gleaning info on the other HMs - at every stage of the process she was given an advantage, and was never in any danger of an eviction.
Most abject HM, who never tried at all because of her comfort blanket, but yet the WINNER!!
There's so much wrong with that explanation I don't know where to start.
1. It fails to address the underlying issue of severe bias in editing and production process of the entire series.
2. The numbers don't add up.
3. Pauline knew who she was giving the pass to, she didn't know what the punishments and rewards were for Mark and Matthew.
4. The fact Ashleigh was ahead by a load up until the final vote where some how Helen made up the vote difference just to draw even and then continue to keep up with Ashleigh and surpassing her.
5. Where is the justification for keeping Helen in after so many warnings by formal and informal? One Housemate made a racist mark once and was immediately kicked out, Daley made an aggressive act and was kicked out, Helen make religious insults and physical insults and moves numerous times and she stayed in.
If you think it's a fix the answer is simple, don't watch it.
I ceased watching Xfactor and Britains got talent as I felt the judges manipulated the ones they wanted to win, and I'd felt it for a couple of series.
The last time I watched it, I felt who was highly talented, but I knew who Simon wanted promoting, I said if that person was to go through over the person who had the real talent, that I would not watch it any more, it did happen, so I no longer watch it.
I have never felt I'm missing out on anything, as I why would I miss something that was fixed?
That statement is a poor attempt to conceal the lie
facts are they put helen in there she did not apply
no way on gods earth are the votes real. only a gullible hobbit would even consider it
she should of and would of been chucked out of that house many times over her anticts but bb wanted her in and wanted her to win. everything was done to see it happen that is the biggest fact of all and cannot be denied.
the fact they showed 2 warnings out of how many 20? just shows the level of their manipulation.
hopefully it will be investigated properly every minute part and the truth revealed.
the public have been conned. and some dont even realize it or refuse to believe it. when the facts are all there.
if it barks like a dog its not a chcken:)
Comments
You calling an independent auditor a liar?
But probably waited until it was one on one.
It wouldn't have mad sense to vote for Pav or Ash as they hadn't a hope in Hell of beating Ashleigh.
Especially Christopher, who was second favourite, and Irish, the Irish voted Helen instead of Ashleigh, heehee - must've been her charming disposition, ummmm!
Are we seriously meant to believe this, huge turn around in votes, this wasn't BB viewers voting and that's the problem.
Why have a show if it is open to abuse, by who?
Really? Watch this
"Pauline has decided you should be given a pass to the final"
The reward she chose was Mark winning 5k.
Maybe the Channel 5 supporters would like to comment on that as sure as hell Channel 5 haven't and won't.
And this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41wXt8eGQRQ
Again, you are wrong. Watch this
"Pauline, who do you wish to grant this pass to to the final to?"
1. It fails to address the underlying issue of severe bias in editing and production process of the entire series.
2. The numbers don't add up.
3. Pauline knew who she was giving the pass to, she didn't know what the punishments and rewards were for Mark and Matthew.
4. The fact Ashleigh was ahead by a load up until the final vote where some how Helen made up the vote difference just to draw even and then continue to keep up with Ashleigh and surpassing her.
5. Where is the justification for keeping Helen in after so many warnings by formal and informal? One Housemate made a racist mark once and was immediately kicked out, Daley made an aggressive act and was kicked out, Helen make religious insults and physical insults and moves numerous times and she stayed in.
Im confused? BBOTS sho aired her being warned about her verbalised threat to smash in Ashleighs face,this is way after Matt and Dan left?? Was that just an intervention?
Dont aired stuff on BBOTS count? Dosent the fact it was aired mean by thier own words that it was formal?
Helen being the only one of the final few to have been privvy to Diary room conversation and yet the final Power HM gave her it again - reinforcing a perceived notion this time that she had changed. The reintroduction of the HMs - caused a 180° change in direction obviously linked.
Helen's road to change and the countless unscreened interventions from BB
The sudden change in BOTS opinions days before the final appearing completely contrived.
The voting numbers of Helen being 100k, yet she had more than 131k more votes than Pav...
I feel that there is something wrong, but acknwoledge that it could simply be a perception and not even BB's fault. I feel that trust has been lost and OFCOM could either confirm our fears or vindicate BB.
Surely this is a win/win situation for Big Brother as it itself says, it is above board.
You may be talking about something different and if so I apologise.but no they didn't. Big Brother chose her to be fake evicted, it had nothing to do with the power HM.
Christopher fans?
There were two Power HMs that week, why didn't they pick one HM each to go...
Why did BB feel the need to say the 'public' evicted' Helen.
So then it was like a road to redemption.
She was sat downstairs, gleaning info on the other HMs - at every stage of the process she was given an advantage, and was never in any danger of an eviction.
Most abject HM, who never tried at all because of her comfort blanket, but yet the WINNER!!
Happy Days!!
One would hope so.
But the fact that they got the first two lot of vote counts the wrong way round in the terms of time frames will only make matters worse I feel.
And the paranoia ups another notch.
That plus the fact that they downright lied about Pauline not knowing she was giving Helen a pass to the final...
If you think it's a fix the answer is simple, don't watch it.
I ceased watching Xfactor and Britains got talent as I felt the judges manipulated the ones they wanted to win, and I'd felt it for a couple of series.
The last time I watched it, I felt who was highly talented, but I knew who Simon wanted promoting, I said if that person was to go through over the person who had the real talent, that I would not watch it any more, it did happen, so I no longer watch it.
I have never felt I'm missing out on anything, as I why would I miss something that was fixed?
That statement is a poor attempt to conceal the lie
facts are they put helen in there she did not apply
no way on gods earth are the votes real. only a gullible hobbit would even consider it
she should of and would of been chucked out of that house many times over her anticts but bb wanted her in and wanted her to win. everything was done to see it happen that is the biggest fact of all and cannot be denied.
the fact they showed 2 warnings out of how many 20? just shows the level of their manipulation.
hopefully it will be investigated properly every minute part and the truth revealed.
the public have been conned. and some dont even realize it or refuse to believe it. when the facts are all there.
if it barks like a dog its not a chcken:)
I know they really can't read can they.
Maybe they're signed to Richard Desmond's imaginary talent agency as well?