I have stated on an ongoing basis, that hatred in retort is not a viable solution to quell hatred.
How do you expect Helen to change in a world where everyone is slanderous?
Please have a think about it. Thank you.
and I asked how you could ask fms to post nicely whilst you are supporting one of the most foul-mouthed hms. If you are so concerned about people being nice the logic says you would not post in support of Helen having seen her disgraceful behaviour and, no doubt, read her even more disgraceful tweets (both before, now deleted for obvious reasons, and after BB).
Question ..... What is slanderous about posters saying that Helen was a foul mouthed viscous housemate?
We saw enough of her foul mouth during the series she was viscous in the way her face contorted when she was arguing.
I would say that if she took on board that her behaviour was not acceptable in decent society then perhaps she would learn to control herself.
If and I say if she changed her nasty ways then I for one would say "good on you Helen" but until that day I do not think she was a worthy winner.
Well said Janet.
Her behaviour inside the house was appalling imo. It isn't any better outside of the house is it from what I've been reading. So much for changing Helen huh!
and I asked how you could ask fms to post nicely whilst you are supporting one of the most foul-mouthed hms. If you are so concerned about people being nice the logic says you would not post in support of Helen having seen her disgraceful behaviour and, no doubt, read her even more disgraceful tweets (both before, now deleted for obvious reasons, and after BB).
It's down to her being a bitch. Simple as. Pathetic seeing her and Danielle on Twitter having it out. Forget about it. We all know what Helen was like.
It's down to her being a bitch. Simple as. Pathetic seeing her and Danielle on Twitter having it out. Forget about it. We all know what Helen was like.
The irony of a "Tzu" posting such a message made me giggle somewhat.
Janet Hatfield, cliaming someone's mouth is "foul" is defamation.
It is not a viable description but one of slander.
The correct description could be (as one example) that her mannerisms leave much to be desired for select people.
With words such as "foul mouth" you are defining the status quo and the standard of society so you set not a viable place where anyone is likely to change in accordance with your expectations.
Create then some positive contributions that might see her make that change.
Good vibes are contagious and they might well reach a woman who you see as rude, but is actually perhaps in a state of distress and needed help.
"Be the change you want to see in the world".
firstly:
"cliaming (sic) someone's mouth is "foul" is demfamation"
definition of foul mouthed: "adjective
using or characterized by a great deal of bad language.
synonyms: vulgar, crude, coarse; More"
definition of defamation: "a term that is used to describe when false statement is written or spoken about an individual"
therefore "foul mouthed " is in fact the correct adjective to describe Helen
Viable : you don't seem to know what viable is so here's the definition:
"ADJECTIVE
Capable of working successfully; feasible:"
so under those terms the description of Helen as "Foul mouthed" by Janet was not only extremely viable it was also not defamation.
Perhaps if you spent less time telling the FMs to revise themselves and more time using a dictionary you save us all this boring ritual of educating you.
Janet Hatfield, cliaming someone's mouth is "foul" is defamation.
It is not a viable description but one of slander.
The correct description could be (as one example) that her mannerisms leave much to be desired for select people.
With words such as "foul mouth" you are defining the status quo and the standard of society so you set not a viable place where anyone is likely to change in accordance with your expectations.
Create then some positive contributions that might see her make that change.
Good vibes are contagious and they might well reach a woman who you see as rude, but is actually perhaps in a state of distress and needed help.
"Be the change you want to see in the world".
Bit in bold one:
What a load of................... the definition of foul mouthed in the Oxford Dictionary is a tendency to use bad language.
Bit in bold two: eh? How is saying someone has a tendency to use bad language defining the existing social state of affairs? And how on earth could telling someone they have a tendency to use bad language be deemed a repellent to their chances of change?
Perhaps you should have a word with Helen about her 'vibes'.
Perhaps if you spent less time telling the FMs to revise themselves and more time using a dictionary you save us all this boring ritual of educating you.
Please don't be rude Planets.
I have explained myself thoroughly and very politely so I don't expect that tone in return.
"Foul mouthed" is a slang term for bad manners expressed orally. As such the mouth is not "foul" by any means. It is a slang term relating to choice of words.
firstly:
"cliaming (sic) someone's mouth is "foul" is demfamation"
definition of foul mouthed: "adjective
using or characterized by a great deal of bad language.
synonyms: vulgar, crude, coarse; More"
definition of defamation: "a term that is used to describe when false statement is written or spoken about an individual"
therefore "foul mouthed " is in fact the correct adjective to describe Helen
Viable : you don't seem to know what viable is so here's the definition:
"ADJECTIVE
Capable of working successfully; feasible:"
so under those terms the description of Helen as "Foul mouthed" by Janet was not only extremely viable it was also not defamation.
Perhaps if you spent less time telling the FMs to revise themselves and more time using a dictionary you save us all this boring ritual of educating you.
I have explained myself thoroughly and very politely so I don't expect that tone in return.
"Foul mouthed" is a slang term for bad manners expressed orally. As such the mouth is not "foul" by any means. It is a slang term relating to choice of words.
The term then stands as a form of slander.
Thank you.
No 'foul mouthed' is a dictionary defined reference to someone who has a tendency to use bad language. ...... as you've now been told several times.
I have explained myself thoroughly and very politely so I don't expect that tone in return.
"Foul mouthed" is a slang term for bad manners expressed orally. As such the mouth as not "foul" by any means, bu the words eminating from it questionable.
Thank you.
i am not being rude i am "revising" you.
There was no tone that is you defaming me.
"Foul Mouthed" is not a "slang term" it is as defined as i stated it.
You have continually baited FMs the entire series with your posts that mainly consist of telling people to "revise themselves".
I have given entirely correct dictionary definitions to all the words used and i did not do it rudely.
You use words and you patently don't know what they mean.
Must try harder to bait people into being rude and getting banned Corey you are failing miserably
And how on earth could telling someone they have a tendency to use bad language be deemed a repellent to their chances of change?
.
That is not what was said PatsyLimerick.
"Foul mouthed" was the term used and it stands as slander as mentioned - a word which carries no quality that's likely to encourage a person to change.
At the extreme end, we have someone who's introduce an even worse form of slander, so all in all, the message is; no-one is going to solve the hatred with hatred as I've said time and time again.
Comments
and I asked how you could ask fms to post nicely whilst you are supporting one of the most foul-mouthed hms. If you are so concerned about people being nice the logic says you would not post in support of Helen having seen her disgraceful behaviour and, no doubt, read her even more disgraceful tweets (both before, now deleted for obvious reasons, and after BB).
Well said Janet.
Her behaviour inside the house was appalling imo. It isn't any better outside of the house is it from what I've been reading. So much for changing Helen huh!
You have not paid attetion to my reply StarGazer.
It is not a viable description but one of slander.
It is only slander if it's an untruth. Which in this case it isn't an untruth.
The correct description could be (as one example) that her mannerisms leave much to be desired for select people.
Or, in the real world, she was a gobby vindictive wotnot.
I don't believe that to be true.
and I don't believe Helen to be this:
1.
grossly offensive to the senses; disgustingly loathsome; noisome:
I believe her to be projecting a mannerism which suggests she's perhaps in a state of inner conflict.
How can you berate FM's for speaking their minds, yet seem to applaud Helen for her behaviour?
That's a bit of a puzzle.
(No applauding here).
That is an untrue statement.
..and how people treat her is a reflection of how she treats them.
This is the vicious circle of unproductiivity and the very essence of the message I'm attempting to convey.
People need to play their part in breaking the circle, which in turn, can help people to break it themselves.
The irony of a "Tzu" posting such a message made me giggle somewhat.
firstly:
"cliaming (sic) someone's mouth is "foul" is demfamation"
definition of foul mouthed: "adjective
using or characterized by a great deal of bad language.
synonyms: vulgar, crude, coarse; More"
definition of defamation: "a term that is used to describe when false statement is written or spoken about an individual"
therefore "foul mouthed " is in fact the correct adjective to describe Helen
Viable : you don't seem to know what viable is so here's the definition:
"ADJECTIVE
Capable of working successfully; feasible:"
so under those terms the description of Helen as "Foul mouthed" by Janet was not only extremely viable it was also not defamation.
Perhaps if you spent less time telling the FMs to revise themselves and more time using a dictionary you save us all this boring ritual of educating you.
Lao Tzu is an ancient philosopher who lives life well and teaches others how to do the same.
Your follow up of calling Winston such a slanderous word was the icing on the cake too.
Bit in bold one:
What a load of................... the definition of foul mouthed in the Oxford Dictionary is a tendency to use bad language.
Bit in bold two:
Perhaps you should have a word with Helen about her 'vibes'.
Please don't be rude Planets.
I have explained myself thoroughly and very politely so I don't expect that tone in return.
"Foul mouthed" is a slang term for bad manners expressed orally. As such the mouth is not "foul" by any means. It is a slang term relating to choice of words.
The term then stands as a form of slander.
Thank you.
No applauding?
Posted re Helen by Corey Webster this morning:
Definatly one of the most fab winners. (sic)
No 'foul mouthed' is a dictionary defined reference to someone who has a tendency to use bad language. ...... as you've now been told several times.
I am sorry but her and her sordid little gang were than most than grossly offensive and loathsome for what they said about Chris.
i am not being rude i am "revising" you.
There was no tone that is you defaming me.
"Foul Mouthed" is not a "slang term" it is as defined as i stated it.
You have continually baited FMs the entire series with your posts that mainly consist of telling people to "revise themselves".
I have given entirely correct dictionary definitions to all the words used and i did not do it rudely.
You use words and you patently don't know what they mean.
Must try harder to bait people into being rude and getting banned Corey you are failing miserably
That is not what was said PatsyLimerick.
"Foul mouthed" was the term used and it stands as slander as mentioned - a word which carries no quality that's likely to encourage a person to change.
At the extreme end, we have someone who's introduce an even worse form of slander, so all in all, the message is; no-one is going to solve the hatred with hatred as I've said time and time again.
Thank you.
That is correct PatsyLimerick.
I thought she was a fabulous winner.