Most people in the America's speak Spanish or Portuguese. The Spanish thoroughly colonized their discovery, they just focused on the warmer climates. There weren't enough of them to fully secure two huge continents before other countries were able to claim settlements of their own.
I thought it was because the Spanish colonised the central/southern areas, hence there being Spanish speaking countries there. The English went for the more northern regions.
That's what playing Colonization suggested to me anyway!
Most people in the America's speak Spanish or Portuguese. The Spanish thoroughly colonized their discovery, they just focused on the warmer climates. There weren't enough of them to fully secure two huge continents before other countries were able to claim settlements of their own.
Now you will confuse him by referring to the America's as opposed to America!
Now you will confuse him by referring to the America's as opposed to America!
I think that the Americas was plural, as in the whole region being north, south and whatever in between. The America's beggared another question, such as America's language (see other thread(s)!
I think that the Americas was plural, as in the whole region being north, south and whatever in between. The America's beggared another question, such as America's language (see other thread(s)!
I'm typing on my iPhone here, give me a break. Spotted the typo after I submitted and was quoted.
Leif Erikson, c. 1075 has the Chinese beat by a considerable margin. Although it could be argued that the Thule tribes that crossed the Bering Straits to populate N. America were there first.
One of the things I remember from my school history is that the Pope once divided the non-European world between Spain and Portugal, saying that they could have half each.
One of the things I remember from my school history is that the Pope once divided the non-European world between Spain and Portugal, saying that they could have half each.
Which Pope was that? I certainly don't see (having checked out on a map) that Spain and Portugal were evenly severed!! Maybe it is time for a more thorough discussion on this subject with said history teacher.
Comments
Watch Horrible Histories sometimes sometime all this is explained
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p-bWA1FOqs
That's what playing Colonization suggested to me anyway!
Now you will confuse him by referring to the America's as opposed to America!
I think that the Americas was plural, as in the whole region being north, south and whatever in between. The America's beggared another question, such as America's language (see other thread(s)!
I'm typing on my iPhone here, give me a break. Spotted the typo after I submitted and was quoted.
Because of the spurious apostrophe, you mean?
;-)
This is a typical, misinformed to create an argument, thread.:D
Yes, yes, we get it. I think the OP is far too confused already for stray punctuation to add to it.
Yes, this is my understanding too.
The Americas were discovered by a lost highly advanced ancient civilization long before the ice-age.
Love it - do you mean a typical
(fill in the blanks) or atypical!
Leif Erikson, c. 1075 has the Chinese beat by a considerable margin. Although it could be argued that the Thule tribes that crossed the Bering Straits to populate N. America were there first.
Wouldn't the first people been those who came across when there was still a bridge across from Asia?
Which Pope was that? I certainly don't see (having checked out on a map) that Spain and Portugal were evenly severed!! Maybe it is time for a more thorough discussion on this subject with said history teacher.
Quite small.
Bit like a troll in fact