They are absolutely nothing like each other. Helen actually has a personality. She was a huge character throughout the Big Brother process. The public chose her as our winner. Katie Price is like a blank canvas. Most of the time she just sits there with a blank expression. She has no chance of winning the show.
I think she won because of a betting scam personally.
Huge characters aren't always hugely nice. The drunk in a pub is a huge character but that doesn't make them interesting.
I don't call not wanting to get involved with the childish antics in the house being a blank canvas. I call it being better than that and not desperate for camera time.
Imagine KP hating on some one for weeks then letting them chase her round the garden whilst giggling like a school girl. What would you call that...game playing?
Even Big Brother had to check it out because it was that ridiculous.
Rather a blank canvas than a canvas full of hypocritical s**t imo.
A basic google search will provide the information you require.
I have already provided the definition for a journalist. Helen is a journalist.
Katie Price had a column in the sun and over the years various mag columns, you seem to think she made money from her tits, but by your definition she is a journalist.
By no stretch of the imagination....I think the word you struggle to find is PROSTITUTE
You are indeed correct she is not a journalist. I figured for every time Rufus incorrectly points out Helen is a journalist I can point out the proof of her not being a journalist so here you go...Research I did about a week ago...Took me about 2 minutes.
" Out of respect for how much you defend Helen which even though I disagree with your opinions Rufus I do find somewhat admirable.
So I wanted to dig a little deeper and thought if there was proof of her being a Journalist I will back down and apologize.
The "By Helen Wood" is a clickable link which leads to the profile page of Daily Star Journalist - Nadia Mendoza. The Digital Showbiz Editor for the Daily Star.
So the articles are indeed written by a Journalist but its not Helen Wood. Helen Wood would give her story and opinions to Nadia who then writes a column and posts it under the name of Helen Wood.
Nothing for Helen to be ashamed off. A Newspaper are paying her for her opinions, but they are not paying her to be a journalist "
To which when I post this Rufus tries to play it down and refers to Nadia as "Just the editor" and to "Move on please". I just provide facts...Rufus did indeed correctly identify what a jorunalist is...Helen isn't one though. Her opinions but not her writing ;-)
You are indeed correct she is not a journalist. I figured for every time Rufus incorrectly points out Helen is a journalist I can point out the proof of her not being a journalist so here you go...Research I did about a week ago...Took me about 2 minutes.
" Out of respect for how much you defend Helen which even though I disagree with your opinions Rufus I do find somewhat admirable.
So I wanted to dig a little deeper and thought if there was proof of her being a Journalist I will back down and apologize.
The "By Helen Wood" is a clickable link which leads to the profile page of Daily Star Journalist - Nadia Mendoza. The Digital Showbiz Editor for the Daily Star.
So the articles are indeed written by a Journalist but its not Helen Wood. Helen Wood would give her story and opinions to Nadia who then writes a column and posts it under the name of Helen Wood.
Nothing for Helen to be ashamed off. A Newspaper are paying her for her opinions, but they are not paying her to be a journalist "
To which when I post this Rufus tries to play it down and refers to Nadia as "Just the edito:-)r" and to "Move on please". I just provide facts...Rufus did indeed correctly identify what a jorunalist is...Helen isn't one though. Her opinions but not her writing ;-)
Thank you for that RabidWolverine.. confirms what I thought
A basic google search will provide the information you require.
I have already provided the definition for a journalist. Helen is a journalist.
Except she isn't. If she wrote her column herself maybe she could very loosely describe herself as a journalist, but as her column is written for her by a staff writer then she isn't a journalist. Having a conversation with someone by phone or email and then having that conversation transcribed into a readable format by someone employed by the Daily Star does not make your cousin a journalist. You can say she is a journalist as many times as you like, but just saying it will not make it so.
What a perverted question to ask. She is revolting.
I've had quite enough of this total nonentity. Once she's gone through the ex boyfriends and the sex talk there really isn't much else to her.
I have also noticed her facial expression seems to stay the same, regardless. She is one very cold woman. No wonder her husbands don't last long. Pete had a lucky escape.
Do you like tall men or short men>? do you like a woman with big bewbs or a thin fit small chested one? Are you crazy about Blondes or prefer brunettes
people ask questions like that all the time, Whether a gay guy is bottom top or variable, its a personal question but not perverted IMHO
Katie asking those kind of questions just proves she has very little substance. Talk like that I would expect from a 19yr old, not a mother of five who's nearly 40 and well aware that she's on tv. Unless she's talking about her exes, sex or how she's been done wrong, and how she's really really this nice loving person, there is nothing. It's me me me & some with Katie Price.
Except she isn't. If she wrote her column herself maybe she could very loosely describe herself as a journalist, but as her column is written for her by a staff writer then she isn't a journalist. Having a conversation with someone by phone or email and then having that conversation transcribed into a readable format by someone employed by the Daily Star does not make your cousin a journalist. You can say she is a journalist as many times as you like, but just saying it will not make it so.
Absolutely. Calling minor celebs and reality tv show winners who stick their face at the top of their column that they dictate and then someone else translates into proper English is a huge insult of those real journalists who get their degree and then serve their time on the local rag covering fêtes and lost cat stories desperately hoping one of the nationals will come calling.
Do you like tall men or short men>? do you like a woman with big bewbs or a thin fit small chested one? Are you crazy about Blondes or prefer brunettes
people ask questions like that all the time, Whether a gay guy is bottom top or variable, its a personal question but not perverted IMHO
Do't think so, but nice try.... this is not analagous to blondes etc as the sexual position is not noted...
This is akin to asking someone if they like it 'doggystyle' - which is rude to someone you hardly know and bold even to someone you do!
What a perverted question to ask. She is revolting.
I've had quite enough of this total nonentity. Once she's gone through the ex boyfriends and the sex talk there really isn't much else to her.
I have also noticed her facial expression seems to stay the same, regardless. She is one very cold woman. No wonder her husbands don't last long. Pete had a lucky escape.
She is disgusting, it doesn't matter about his sexuality, she is crude and shouldn't ask.
I don't think she is- I think she's really quite boring and only speaks about sex all the time and asks questions like that because she likes to portray that she's some vixen in the bedroom - and that's what she sells, sex. Her male fans imo are into the image that she's some sort of dirty nympho and she plays into that.
'
I think she's probably not really bothered about sex that much, hence why she goes on and on about it so much - but a glamour model who has sex on bdays and xmas isn't going to sell as well as one who portrays themselves as sex mad.
Just my opinion of course.
What a perverted question to ask. She is revolting.
I've had quite enough of this total nonentity. Once she's gone through the ex boyfriends and the sex talk there really isn't much else to her.
I have also noticed her facial expression seems to stay the same, regardless. She is one very cold woman. No wonder her husbands don't last long. Pete had a lucky escape.
Speaking as a gay guy I would not be offended if someone I knew asked me the same question. Obviously there may be a different context if a stranger asked me on a bus.
I feel these days most people who are offended are never actually offended, they are just offended on behalf of other group who mostly don't give a shit. An example being Michelle's over reaction to Perez dancing in the garden. I'm one of the gays and I thought he was halarious.
I do wonder though if Pricey asked Perez the same question and what his answer was, and whether it matched my theory.
LMAO You are such a hypocrite lol. You are offended by a question she asks and here you are telling someone off for being offended....brilliant
Laughable isn't it.
You couldn't write a book about it. Well, you could and dictate it to another to write for you. Would that then make you an author? Presumably, the same as dictating an article and having another write that for you, makes you a journalist.
Katie Price tries too hard to convince the world that she loves sex and is sexy. Unfortunately, she fails miserably on both counts. Her idea of demonstrating her love of sex is to talk about it...all the time...in anatomical detail! Her idea of being sexy is glaring aggressively at the camera while adopting a porn-esque pose (and being airbrushed to buggery)! What she fails to realise is that effectively showing (and telling) everything you've got isn't sexy. Leaving a bit to the imagination and having a good sense of humour is - but Katie is incapable of discretion and her sense of humour appears to be non-existent!
A journalist who lives off the back of her breasts.
A journalist who was offered that position on the back of winning Big Brother as voted for by the public. The Daily Star offered her that role as they knew there was obviously a lot of interest in her. She wouldn't have won the show otherwise. They knew she's a controversial and opinionated character who would not be afraid to tackle the big issues.
A journalist who was offered that position on the back of winning Big Brother as voted for by the public. The Daily Star offered her that role as they knew there was obviously a lot of interest in her. She wouldn't have won the show otherwise. They knew she's a controversial and opinionated character who would not be afraid to tackle the big issues.
The big issues like "Friends With Benefits" Or what its like to "Find a cheating partner with texts and eyelashes"
Hey, Guardian, Times, Telegraph, Mirror...This is where your going wrong guys...
Comments
But she writes for The Daily Star. Therefore she is a journalist ;-);-);-)
A basic google search will provide the information you require.
I have already provided the definition for a journalist. Helen is a journalist.
I think she won because of a betting scam personally.
Huge characters aren't always hugely nice. The drunk in a pub is a huge character but that doesn't make them interesting.
I don't call not wanting to get involved with the childish antics in the house being a blank canvas. I call it being better than that and not desperate for camera time.
Imagine KP hating on some one for weeks then letting them chase her round the garden whilst giggling like a school girl. What would you call that...game playing?
Even Big Brother had to check it out because it was that ridiculous.
Rather a blank canvas than a canvas full of hypocritical s**t imo.
Katie Price had a column in the sun and over the years various mag columns, you seem to think she made money from her tits, but by your definition she is a journalist.
You are indeed correct she is not a journalist. I figured for every time Rufus incorrectly points out Helen is a journalist I can point out the proof of her not being a journalist so here you go...Research I did about a week ago...Took me about 2 minutes.
" Out of respect for how much you defend Helen which even though I disagree with your opinions Rufus I do find somewhat admirable.
So I wanted to dig a little deeper and thought if there was proof of her being a Journalist I will back down and apologize.
So I found one of her recent columns where she "Rips Into Poisonous Dwarf Perez Hilton" and where it shows underneath the column headline "By Helen Wood"
The "By Helen Wood" is a clickable link which leads to the profile page of Daily Star Journalist - Nadia Mendoza. The Digital Showbiz Editor for the Daily Star.
So the articles are indeed written by a Journalist but its not Helen Wood. Helen Wood would give her story and opinions to Nadia who then writes a column and posts it under the name of Helen Wood.
Nothing for Helen to be ashamed off. A Newspaper are paying her for her opinions, but they are not paying her to be a journalist "
To which when I post this Rufus tries to play it down and refers to Nadia as "Just the editor" and to "Move on please". I just provide facts...Rufus did indeed correctly identify what a jorunalist is...Helen isn't one though. Her opinions but not her writing ;-)
Except she isn't. If she wrote her column herself maybe she could very loosely describe herself as a journalist, but as her column is written for her by a staff writer then she isn't a journalist. Having a conversation with someone by phone or email and then having that conversation transcribed into a readable format by someone employed by the Daily Star does not make your cousin a journalist. You can say she is a journalist as many times as you like, but just saying it will not make it so.
Do you like tall men or short men>? do you like a woman with big bewbs or a thin fit small chested one? Are you crazy about Blondes or prefer brunettes
people ask questions like that all the time, Whether a gay guy is bottom top or variable, its a personal question but not perverted IMHO
A journalist who lives off the back of her breasts.
Absolutely. Calling minor celebs and reality tv show winners who stick their face at the top of their column that they dictate and then someone else translates into proper English is a huge insult of those real journalists who get their degree and then serve their time on the local rag covering fêtes and lost cat stories desperately hoping one of the nationals will come calling.
Do't think so, but nice try.... this is not analagous to blondes etc as the sexual position is not noted...
This is akin to asking someone if they like it 'doggystyle' - which is rude to someone you hardly know and bold even to someone you do!
I think they were playing truth or dare they have been playing it for days
Do you suffer from some sort of problem? You seem delusional. Looks like YOU'RE the only one who needs to step off the outrage bus.
Strange.
I don't think she is- I think she's really quite boring and only speaks about sex all the time and asks questions like that because she likes to portray that she's some vixen in the bedroom - and that's what she sells, sex. Her male fans imo are into the image that she's some sort of dirty nympho and she plays into that.
'
I think she's probably not really bothered about sex that much, hence why she goes on and on about it so much - but a glamour model who has sex on bdays and xmas isn't going to sell as well as one who portrays themselves as sex mad.
Just my opinion of course.
Anytime ;-)
Botox.
I feel these days most people who are offended are never actually offended, they are just offended on behalf of other group who mostly don't give a shit. An example being Michelle's over reaction to Perez dancing in the garden. I'm one of the gays and I thought he was halarious.
I do wonder though if Pricey asked Perez the same question and what his answer was, and whether it matched my theory.
LMAO You are such a hypocrite lol. You are offended by a question she asks and here you are telling someone off for being offended....brilliant
Laughable isn't it.
You couldn't write a book about it. Well, you could and dictate it to another to write for you. Would that then make you an author? Presumably, the same as dictating an article and having another write that for you, makes you a journalist.
Hmmm!
;-):)
From the poster who just made a thread detailing how very offended they are by a total non-event?
A journalist who was offered that position on the back of winning Big Brother as voted for by the public. The Daily Star offered her that role as they knew there was obviously a lot of interest in her. She wouldn't have won the show otherwise. They knew she's a controversial and opinionated character who would not be afraid to tackle the big issues.
The big issues like "Friends With Benefits" Or what its like to "Find a cheating partner with texts and eyelashes"
Hey, Guardian, Times, Telegraph, Mirror...This is where your going wrong guys...
TACKLE THE REAL ISSUES