Options
This fake winner needs to be stripped of her win
[Deleted User]
Posts: 3,306
Forum Member
✭✭✭
Using a fake dog and not telling the public, she was a cheat and needs to be stripped of the title and everyone who voted have the money refunded.
0
Comments
No.
Anyone who paid to vote should realise it was their own fault anyway because you can have five free votes on the app; you don't need to pay. And why should she be stripped of her win over a non-issue?
It's like going to see a Oscar-winning movie and demanding it's stripped of its Oscar because there was a stunt double in it.
Great so I can now enter miming to a great singer and win, even without telling anyone.. Now where is the entry form!
That's completely different. And anyway, it could work if played as a comedy similar to the end scene in Singin' In The Rain.
yes but not the one everyone voted for...
Yes it was. People voted for Chase as well as Matisse in the semi final. If some people thought Chase wouldn't be part of the final performance, then they're unbelievably thick and should probably audition for TOWIE.
Therefore even though lots of people (myself included) hadn't twigged at the time that it was Chase who was walking the wire we'd already accepted that performers other than "Jules" and "Matisse" were part of the act. We already knew Chase exists because of the semis so it shouldn't be a massive shock at his reintroduction.
Why should they believe Chase was in the final, the dog was not in the first round. Only Matisse, so why would the public not believe it was only this dog again, if both were in all the rounds then yes your comment is right,,but that was not the case.
Because Chase was in the semi final and helped them get through to the final in the first place?
TOWIE is waiting for you, myscimitar...
Ok, be honest when you watched it, did you get it was Chase going across the ropes at the time!
Oh you are still - still the same old rant - give it a rest you are boring
No but I wasn't too surprised when she said it was Chase a day later.
It's almost like the country's talent barrel has been scraped completely dry, so anything goes...
As the human half of a dog act she was much less likeable than Ashleigh was when she won BGT.
And, of course, Asheligh did it for the love of her dog without any thoughts initially of making money out of it all.
Jules, on the other hand is old enough, and experienced enough in the animal training world, (where she earns her living anyway), to be fully motivated by the potential for extra income.
Yep, she entered the biggest televised talent show in the country with absolutely no thoughts of fame and fortune. She might have been young but I doubt if she was stupid.
Love all the dogs, cant stand her and not just this incident just something about her
I really dislike immensely
Because it is acceptable and not in any way cruel.
As it happens Ashleigh and her family are experienced dog trainers too, Pudsey isn't just a one off pet he's part of a business and was bred and has offspring for the purpose of performing. That said what you said about Ashleigh charismatically vs Jules is fair comment.