I think that teenagers are discriminated against by the media to such a large extent that their would be an outcry if it was any other age group.
Not everyone needs to be a leader. Sure don't be a mindless follower but we do need some people to help those in front. Alot of people are better suited to being in the background so why this push to create artificial leaders?
Not heroes to me : I don't think any soldier from any country who fires a gun or drops a bomb on another human being (because his leader/government told him to) is a hero as is comonly portrayed in the press, it disgusts me how society tries to get us to think of them as heroes and i cant think of anything more evil and insane than trying to kill someone you havent met yet with a gun or fly past in a plane and drop a hideous bomb on people. Children have more common sense that some adults in this respect and i really do mean that
That applies to the soldiers of any country in the world just to get that straight. Sure the army can do good when they want but lets face it, we could train people to do good things anyway without the armed element. far too many hideous evil weapons are being made for profit causing untold damage at the expense of good things in the world, and they call us civilised man :mad:
Kill one man and its murder, kill hundreds of thousands and its foreign policy
Not a sequel, part of a planned trilogy, completely different game.
The prequels were planned? I always assumed that Lucas just pointed the camera at some bad actors, told them to talk a load of nonsense, and stuck a lot of CGI in later
The prequels were planned? I always assumed that Lucas just pointed the camera at some bad actors, told them to talk a load of nonsense, and stuck a lot of CGI in later
I don't really care for the prequels, except perhaps Phantom Menace, I have a soft spot for that.
Comments
I agree and doughnuts too. Not a fan of either!
Not everyone needs to be a leader. Sure don't be a mindless follower but we do need some people to help those in front. Alot of people are better suited to being in the background so why this push to create artificial leaders?
I think it's because very very long threads can actually crash a forum though. That's what I've read on others anyway.
Also, I think Die Hard is the greatest film of all time.
Sequels are always better than the originals.
Please! by definition alone they're inferior films!
Gremlins 2 and Terminator 2 certainly were.
You couldn't be more wrong if you tried!
What about Star Wars? Technically the original trilogy are the sequels.
Aliens?
That applies to the soldiers of any country in the world just to get that straight. Sure the army can do good when they want but lets face it, we could train people to do good things anyway without the armed element. far too many hideous evil weapons are being made for profit causing untold damage at the expense of good things in the world, and they call us civilised man :mad:
Kill one man and its murder, kill hundreds of thousands and its foreign policy
That's DEFINITELY an unpopular opinion.:D
Not a sequel, part of a planned saga, completely different game.
Good, but not a patch on 'Alien', which is still the benchmark for SF Horror, along with 'The Thing'
The prequels were planned? I always assumed that Lucas just pointed the camera at some bad actors, told them to talk a load of nonsense, and stuck a lot of CGI in later
I don't really care for the prequels, except perhaps Phantom Menace, I have a soft spot for that.
But here's one, Scream or Scream 2?
The expression 'my bad' is wonderful and should be used more often.
Sorry