Options

International Cricket 2015

16791112249

Comments

  • Options
    tiger2000tiger2000 Posts: 8,541
    Forum Member
    England 182/6

    Taylor leading the Victory Charge :-)
  • Options
    R82n8R82n8 Posts: 3,656
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Broad is going to be like a superhuman and win this for England. :kitty:

    Scratch that. :blush:
  • Options
    swingalegswingaleg Posts: 103,122
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    R82n8 wrote: »
    Broad is going to be like a superhuman and win this for England. :kitty:

    Scratch that. :blush:

    :D

    oh dear..........
  • Options
    cantoscantos Posts: 7,368
    Forum Member
    Surely that should have been 'Dead Ball'.
  • Options
    R82n8R82n8 Posts: 3,656
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Wouldn't change the outcome, but the ball was dead, bad decision.
  • Options
    tiger2000tiger2000 Posts: 8,541
    Forum Member
    Farcical end to the game.

    Does this mean you can now get both batsmen out with a single ball?
  • Options
    walterwhitewalterwhite Posts: 56,965
    Forum Member
    We weren't going to win, but if it comes down to net run rate that decision could cost England dearly. Ridiculous decision.
  • Options
    tiger2000tiger2000 Posts: 8,541
    Forum Member
    We weren't going to win, but if it comes down to net run rate that decision could cost England dearly. Ridiculous decision.
    Why did'nt the 3rd Umpire or Match Commissioner intervene, surly someone must know the rules!
  • Options
    alanwarwicalanwarwic Posts: 28,396
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Well, it wont stop us making the quarters, though making the final is now a slimmer bet.


    And Boycs, wear that 'ranter' badge with pride. The other chap is best left to kiss ass in the jungle of reality TV.
  • Options
    dtcdtcdtcdtcdtcdtc Posts: 16,992
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I know it's a team game, but that decision has robbed Taylor the chance of an important personal milestone of an International hundred

    I realise the umpire's decision is always right but this time it's wrong !
  • Options
    misawa97misawa97 Posts: 11,579
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    The mighty England never fail to deliver entertainment value.
  • Options
    tiger2000tiger2000 Posts: 8,541
    Forum Member
    dtcdtcdtc wrote: »
    I know it's a team game, but that decision has robbed Taylor the chance of an important personal milestone of an International hundred

    I realise the umpire's decision is always right but this time it's wrong !

    The Sky pundits have just read out the specific law regarding 3rd Umpire decisions, The Ball is Dead the moment the batsman is given out before the appeal.

    Shocking lack of knowledge by the on field and 3rd umpires.
  • Options
    gomezzgomezz Posts: 44,633
    Forum Member
    On TMS Sir Geoffrey was commenting on the absurdity of having the one big "discovery" from the warm up games that Taylor was the best number 3 we had then playing him in the biggest game of the cup we are likely to play down the order and drafting in someone else who did not do much in the warm ups.
  • Options
    LostFoolLostFool Posts: 90,662
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    tiger2000 wrote: »
    The Sky pundits have just read out the specific law regarding 3rd Umpire decisions, The Ball is Dead the moment the batsman is given out before the appeal.

    Shocking lack of knowledge by the on field and 3rd umpires.

    Fortunately it made no difference to the result (other than denying Taylor a ton) but just imagine what could happen in a more pivotal game.
  • Options
    alanwarwicalanwarwic Posts: 28,396
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Anyone else notice that in a continuation of the Ashes ODIs, both Broad and Anderson are far too impotent as opening bowlers.

    However, they may likely 'get by' against lesser opposition.
  • Options
    HaydenHayden Posts: 32,949
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The same points now being discussed across two different threads.
  • Options
    Steveaustin316Steveaustin316 Posts: 15,779
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Hayden wrote: »
    The same points now being discussed across two different threads.

    Not sure why a new thread was created when it wasn't needed. Perhaps the mods will merge the threads.
  • Options
    gomezzgomezz Posts: 44,633
    Forum Member
    So as not get World Cup discussion mixed up with anything else going on in world cricket at the moment ... Oh, wait! Hang on ... :kitty:
  • Options
    Mitu_PappiMitu_Pappi Posts: 1,341
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The run out referral was made by the square leg umpire same time as the lbw decision given by Dar. Third umpire gave correct answer to the square leg referral.
  • Options
    abecernabecern Posts: 151
    Forum Member
    England are never going to get off to a blazing start with Ali and Bell opening (despite the field restrictions). Compare that to Australia with Warner and Finch who more often than not will score very quickly. Two very contrasting opening partnerships. Anyway, the way this World Cup is structured, all England have to do is take care of the minnows and they will be in the quarters. One good day there and then all of a sudden in the semis, which will be seen as success, when in truth it will hide the many deficiencies.
  • Options
    Mitu_PappiMitu_Pappi Posts: 1,341
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    abecern wrote: »
    England are never going to get off to a blazing start with Ali and Bell opening (despite the field restrictions). Compare that to Australia with Warner and Finch who more often than not will score very quickly. Two very contrasting opening partnerships. Anyway, the way this World Cup is structured, all England have to do is take care of the minnows and they will be in the quarters. One good day there and then all of a sudden in the semis, which will be seen as success, when in truth it will hide the many deficiencies.

    Ali is far too suspect against the rising delivery. Fast bowlers now have his measure. Does not bode well for the future. His other main attribute is spin. But we need a good spinner not a makeshift one.
  • Options
    Jason CJason C Posts: 31,336
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Not sure why a new thread was created when it wasn't needed.

    Disagree; the World Cup is more significant than other run-of-the-mill international matches and as such deserves its own thread.
  • Options
    Steveaustin316Steveaustin316 Posts: 15,779
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Jason C wrote: »
    Disagree; the World Cup is more significant than other run-of-the-mill international matches and as such deserves its own thread.

    The mods need to lock one of the threads for the duration of the World Cup so that we don't get two seperate threads discussing the same subject.
  • Options
    Jason CJason C Posts: 31,336
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The mods need to lock one of the threads for the duration of the World Cup so that we don't get two seperate threads discussing the same subject.

    Yeah, that would be sensible.
  • Options
    SULLASULLA Posts: 149,789
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    cantos wrote: »
    Surely that should have been 'Dead Ball'.
    tiger2000 wrote: »
    Why did'nt the 3rd Umpire or Match Commissioner intervene, surly someone must know the rules!
    It would appear that they didn't. Disgraceful.
    gomezz wrote: »
    On TMS Sir Geoffrey was commenting on the absurdity of having the one big "discovery" from the warm up games that Taylor was the best number 3 we had then playing him in the biggest game of the cup we are likely to play down the order and drafting in someone else who did not do much in the warm ups.
    Balance should have been playing the warm up games. Taylor should have been higher in the order.
    Mitu_Pappi wrote: »
    The run out referral was made by the square leg umpire same time as the lbw decision given by Dar. Third umpire gave correct answer to the square leg referral.

    The Third umpire should also have known the law. >:(

    Anyway, Finch and Maxwell playing for Yorkshire this year.
Sign In or Register to comment.