Bollocks it does. It's a laugh reading all you women saying that Nicole is far more attractive than Cheryl. Tell that to heterosexual men and nine times out of ten they'll laugh in your face.
Agreed, Nicole is one of those people that I know is good looking but that's it. Sort of boring attractive.
Cheryl in my opinion looks more interesting and unique. Plus FIT AS FOOK in that new video, nothing wrong with her weight aswell, as far as i can see.
It's funny (but predictable) that there is a kind of radio silence about how good Nicole was.
The Sun had a short article about it, and quoted DS threads, but the Daily Mail has been very low key about it. I remember them going on about how bad Geri Halliwell was, but they've not said anything about how good Nicole was. I think Cheryl has a lot of pull with the DM and Heat magazine too.
Did the Sun really quote the DS threads Wow..I wonder how much pull DS actually has with these shows...:)
I really like her as well....I'm a lady and she is very beautiful, so you sort of feel like you shouldn't like her....But that isn't the case, because she is warm, funny and very likeable...She's better that C Cole any day of the week (I have never been overboard in rating her anyway)...someone who was in the right place at the right time and got very lucky...
And Nicole is super-talented and a far more accomplished singer than C Cole!
Nicole was a great guest judge, not surprised she was asked back at Boot Camp. Wish she would stay permanently in Cheryl's place, and get someone to replace the tedious and hypocritical Louis Walsh. Then, take away the live audience at the auditions and I would be a happy bunny.
Bollocks it does. It's a laugh reading all you women saying that Nicole is far more attractive than Cheryl. Tell that to heterosexual men and nine times out of ten they'll laugh in your face.
The reason I say she's more attractive is because I would much rather look like Nicole. In fact, as gorgeous as Cheryl's face looks fully made up etc, I'd rather stay looking like me than look like her (that might make me weird, I don't know). On the other hand, I'd love to look like Nicole.
Plus, like I said in another thread, it's all about taste. Most of my guy friends seem to prefer Nicole because they think she's actually sexier (bodywise in particular), although they'd obviously still love to 'do' Cheryl.
The reason I say she's more attractive is because I would much rather look like Nicole. In fact, as gorgeous as Cheryl's face looks fully made up etc, I'd rather stay looking like me than look like her (that might make me weird, I don't know). On the other hand, I'd love to look like Nicole.
Plus, like I said in another thread, it's all about taste. Most of my guy friends seem to prefer Nicole because they think she's actually sexier (bodywise in particular), although they'd obviously still love to 'do' Cheryl.
Well you're a girl, I don't know what these pictures are trying to prove, are they supposedly her best? because if I'm being honest she's still got the slight tranny look in the first pic, I prefer Cheryl, just my opinion. And as for personalities, how do you know? have you spent long periods of time with both?
And she isn't done up at all there, I bet all she had to do at school and even now is smile at people and they'd do whatever she wanted.
I also think Nicole like Cheryl wears far too much make up, whether she needs it I don't know.
No, if I'm honest. She does look lovely there but those are two well chosen 'natural' photos (and in the second she is still wearing mascara, eyeliner, lip gloss and foundation, with extensions and dyed hair)
Completely normal looking.
I'd rather stay looking like me and have all of the enhancements she does - if I looked like her, I'd still need all of those to look that good.
No, if I'm honest. She does look lovely there but those are two well chosen 'natural' photos (and in the second she is still wearing mascara, eyeliner, lip gloss and foundation, with extensions and dyed hair)
Completely normal looking.
I'd rather stay looking like me and have all of the enhancements she does - if I looked like her, I'd still need all of those to look that good.
Nowhere near 'normal looking' even in those shots.
Anyone can find bad pictures of people, that's what the tabloids do, then they compare them to good pictures at different angles and say 'wow look at the transformation'.
Those two "natural" pictures of Cheryl look like she is still wearing make up in them, quite a lot in the second one. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure she is pretty even without make up, but I'm not sure if I have ever even seen a shot where she is wearing no make up at all. I know she said she wasn't on the Kilimanjaro program, but it looked like she had got some lippy on at the very least. I'm sure she didn't bother for the final push, but you could hardly see her face underneath all the layers then!
I think shes been a really good judge so far, she's got a cracking voice herself and she looks amazing all the time [yeh i'm jealous!] but i just think shes waaaaaaaay better than the others so far.
She's definitely better than Danni thats for sure!
I think shes been a really good judge so far, she's got a cracking voice herself and she looks amazing all the time [yeh i'm jealous!] but i just think shes waaaaaaaay better than the others so far.
She's definitely better than Danni thats for sure!
Agreed with all of your post except the better than Danni, if you had posted she is better than Cheryl i would agree 100%;) but yes Nicole is great.
As usual, an innocent thread about someone else on XF turns into a Cheryl is better than [insert name here] thread :rolleyes:
Looking forward to seeing Nicole at bootcamp. Really pleased that she got invited back after Cheryl got poorly. I do love Dannii but Nicole has been better during the auditions. That said, Dannii is always much better in the live shows.
I have ever even seen a shot where she is wearing no make up at all. I know she said she wasn't on the Kilimanjaro program, but it looked like she had got some lippy on at the very least. I'm sure she didn't bother for the final push, but you could hardly see her face underneath all the layers then!
What I find amusing is that nearly 2 years on, the same people are spouting the same old claptrap.:rolleyes:
I don't like Nicole tbh, but hey, give her a chance - but I do think she only got the job because a. the other candidates weren't any good b. no one else wanted it.
Comments
Agreed, Nicole is one of those people that I know is good looking but that's it. Sort of boring attractive.
Cheryl in my opinion looks more interesting and unique. Plus FIT AS FOOK in that new video, nothing wrong with her weight aswell, as far as i can see.
<Impending hysterical responses>
Did the Sun really quote the DS threads Wow..I wonder how much pull DS actually has with these shows...:)
And Nicole is super-talented and a far more accomplished singer than C Cole!
Here is one article: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/tv/x_factor/3144086/Nicole-is-Scher-to-return.html
I know they're from DS.
There are more quotes here: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2010/09/19/does-simon-fancy-me-no-i-think-he-simply-respects-my-work-as-an-artist-115875-22572161/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1313481/X-Factor-2010-Third-time-lucky-Marlon-McKenzie.html#comments
The reason I say she's more attractive is because I would much rather look like Nicole. In fact, as gorgeous as Cheryl's face looks fully made up etc, I'd rather stay looking like me than look like her
Plus, like I said in another thread, it's all about taste. Most of my guy friends seem to prefer Nicole because they think she's actually sexier (bodywise in particular), although they'd obviously still love to 'do' Cheryl.
You wouldn't want to look like this?
http://www.cherylcolefan.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/cheryl-cole-kilimanjaro-climb-day5-post.jpg
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/01/24/article-1245699-07FF5057000005DC-428_233x423.jpg
And she isn't done up at all there, I bet all she had to do at school and even now is smile at people and they'd do whatever she wanted.
I also think Nicole like Cheryl wears far too much make up, whether she needs it I don't know.
Sorry, Nicole wins hands down - she's a million times better, looks wise and in particular, personality wise.
http://portalnicole.com/galeria/displayimage.php?pid=17068&fullsize=1
http://www.motorsport.com/photos/popup.asp?N=1&I=f1/2010/ger/f1-2010-ger-xp-0387.jpg&FS=F1&SN=1_86.166.48.170:35574&S=F1
http://www.motorsport.com/photos/popup.asp?N=0&I=f1/2010/ger/f1-2010-ger-xp-0386.jpg&FS=F1&SN=1_86.166.48.170:35574&S=F1
Well you're a girl, I don't know what these pictures are trying to prove, are they supposedly her best? because if I'm being honest she's still got the slight tranny look in the first pic, I prefer Cheryl, just my opinion. And as for personalities, how do you know? have you spent long periods of time with both?
No, if I'm honest. She does look lovely there but those are two well chosen 'natural' photos (and in the second she is still wearing mascara, eyeliner, lip gloss and foundation, with extensions and dyed hair)
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/44551000/jpg/_44551116_cheryl_tweedy226.jpg
http://www.wallpaperbase.com/wallpapers/celebs/cheryltweedy/cheryl_tweedy_3.jpg
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/11/12/article-0-026F8376000005DC-818_468x648.jpg (ignore the fake hair)
http://images.mirror.co.uk/upl/m4/nov2008/8/8/9C058413-9773-B90D-BB758C7FAED2436D.jpg
http://www.virginmedia.com/images/cheryl-cole-teeth-gal.jpg
Completely normal looking.
I'd rather stay looking like me and have all of the enhancements she does - if I looked like her, I'd still need all of those to look that good.
Nowhere near 'normal looking' even in those shots.
Anyone can find bad pictures of people, that's what the tabloids do, then they compare them to good pictures at different angles and say 'wow look at the transformation'.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfG0F3dWhts&feature=related
got in purely on looks
here's the actual kilimanjaro video to prove it wasn't just a good pic.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwolomSgDkg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHTGGlxYTao&feature=related
and you'll have to clarify what these 'enhancements' are
Bad pictures of Nicole
http://style.popcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/nicole-scherzinger-snubs-john-mayer.jpg
http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00567/NICNIC_380x525_567785a.jpg
http://entertainment.msn.co.nz/img/blog/may10/blog190510_nicole-pussycat-doll.jpg
but do I think that's a true representation of what she looks like in day to day life?
no.
edit- sorry to drag on but I wanted to prove a point. Not all celebrities are as fake as the media chooses to portray them to be.
Those two "natural" pictures of Cheryl look like she is still wearing make up in them, quite a lot in the second one. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure she is pretty even without make up, but I'm not sure if I have ever even seen a shot where she is wearing no make up at all. I know she said she wasn't on the Kilimanjaro program, but it looked like she had got some lippy on at the very least. I'm sure she didn't bother for the final push, but you could hardly see her face underneath all the layers then!
Fully Quoted!
Agreed with all of your post except the better than Danni, if you had posted she is better than Cheryl i would agree 100%;) but yes Nicole is great.
Looking forward to seeing Nicole at bootcamp. Really pleased that she got invited back after Cheryl got poorly. I do love Dannii but Nicole has been better during the auditions. That said, Dannii is always much better in the live shows.
More like an innocent thread about Nicole's judging turns into an excuse to simultaneously have a go at Cheryl, sorry for having an unpopular opinion.
Cheryl clearly wasn't wearing any, it's blatantly obvious.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwolomSgDkg
Looks miles better in those pictures than the tranny look. Beautiful.
I don't like Nicole tbh, but hey, give her a chance - but I do think she only got the job because a. the other candidates weren't any good b. no one else wanted it.