Not necessarily. In Touch prints all sorts of libellous 'exclusive' rubbish about other people every week, affairs based on 'sources' and 'a pal said' and 'onlookers' and 'a friend told us'...
But it's not too difficult to believe it's true, considering his track record...
Boo!!!! Good lord I am such a bad person hoping for scandal
hmm. It's In Touch Magazine... the one that has Angie and Brad splitting every week and Brad going back to Aniston... .not the most reliable of sources
IF this is true then it would explain the Dave visits "Thai Massage Parlour" weird and seemingly innocuous stories from earlier in the week as this would stop any super-injunctions.
Boo!!!! Good lord I am such a bad person hoping for scandal
When/if it hits other media and if this alleged hooker speaks, then yeah, he's well and truly f*ked. But I'm just saying, re In Touch, not the most reliable source....
Why?. Think l'll save my sympathy for some more deserving cause.
Why what? Why shouldn't I feel sorry for her? What's so not deserving about her? If you don't like her, fine, but by asking me why, you're suggesting she's not worth feeling sorry for?
Why what? Why shouldn't I feel sorry for her? What's so not deserving about her? If you don't like her, fine, but by asking me why, you're suggesting she's not worth feeling sorry for?
If it is true, l was just wondering why you would feel sorry for her. It wont be the first time he has deceived her, so she knows what he is like, and decided to stick with him , so whats to feel sorry for. . And by the way, l do not dislike Victoria.
IF this is true then it would explain the Dave visits "Thai Massage Parlour" weird and seemingly innocuous stories from earlier in the week as this would stop any super-injunctions.
As it's in the US press, would someone be able to get something smiliar to a super injunction in the States?
Does sort of explain the massage parlour story if the UK press had wind this was coming
If it is true, l was just wondering why you would feel sorry for her. It wont be the first time he has deceived her, so she knows what he is like, and decided to stick with him , so whats to feel sorry for. . And by the way, l do not dislike Victoria.
That's very black and white. Knowing what he's like is not the same thing as knowing he's going to do the same thing again. She really seems to love him, people forgive for all sorts of reasons. The fact, if this is true, that he's publicly humiliated and screwed around on her again is just such a shitty betrayal after him playing reformed family man and happy families for so long for his public image.
That's actually genuinely been reported in the states, I'm assuming someone's heard a big story was coming out and assumed it was the kid when in fact it's hookers.
EDIT: Whoops, should have read the whole thread first but I still think that story about him having a kid is a pile of shit.
2007?! Beckhams are now taking legal action against in touch. Also holy moly said he thought it was another story, so I think we are left with gay? Or lovechild? Apparently NOTW nearly broke it last year??
The thing I found odd about the massage parlour story was how far into the papers it was (well the paper I saw it in!).
I'd have thought they'd have gone straight to front page with that little tale.
Yes but it's a reputable massage place and not one that offers happy finishes which is why it was buried in side. He wasn't actually doing anything wrong them.
That's actually genuinely been reported in the states, I'm assuming someone's heard a big story was coming out and assumed it was the kid when in fact it's hookers.
There's no need to "FFS" at anybody; the first line of the forum terms and conditions is "please treat other users with respect". You'd be wise to abide by it.
And if you had any sense of context you would realise that the thread was started before the prostitute story was released.
2007?! Beckhams are now taking legal action against in touch. Also holy moly said he thought it was another story, so I think we are left with gay? Or lovechild? Apparently NOTW nearly broke it last year??
I don't blame them. If it is indeed 2007 then it's obviously old ground for the couple (they've either gotten over it or it just didn't happen) and it isn't really in the public interest as it occurred so long ago.
Yes but it's a reputable massage place and not one that offers happy finishes which is why it was buried in side. He wasn't actually doing anything wrong them.
Sorry - I didnt explain myself very well there!!
I agree - when I saw it and realised that it was buried around page 7 I guessed there was nowt seedy in it and that they'd have whooshed it to front page if it was scandal.
2007?! Beckhams are now taking legal action against in touch. Also holy moly said he thought it was another story, so I think we are left with gay? Or lovechild? Apparently NOTW nearly broke it last year??
Didn't they threaten legal action against Loos/NOTW, which never actually happened.
Comments
Boo!!!! Good lord I am such a bad person hoping for scandal
Why?. Think l'll save my sympathy for some more deserving cause.
I've read veiled references to that in the alledged saucy secrets thread.
Big deal, really. I'm surprised that news of his same sex indiscretions haven't broken.
When/if it hits other media and if this alleged hooker speaks, then yeah, he's well and truly f*ked. But I'm just saying, re In Touch, not the most reliable source....
I'll be watching this one closely though. Time will tell.
Why what? Why shouldn't I feel sorry for her? What's so not deserving about her? If you don't like her, fine, but by asking me why, you're suggesting she's not worth feeling sorry for?
If it is true, l was just wondering why you would feel sorry for her. It wont be the first time he has deceived her, so she knows what he is like, and decided to stick with him , so whats to feel sorry for. . And by the way, l do not dislike Victoria.
As it's in the US press, would someone be able to get something smiliar to a super injunction in the States?
Does sort of explain the massage parlour story if the UK press had wind this was coming
http://bit.ly/dh0uCh
http://twitter.com/holymoly
:eek:;)
The thing I found odd about the massage parlour story was how far into the papers it was (well the paper I saw it in!).
I'd have thought they'd have gone straight to front page with that little tale.
That's very black and white. Knowing what he's like is not the same thing as knowing he's going to do the same thing again. She really seems to love him, people forgive for all sorts of reasons. The fact, if this is true, that he's publicly humiliated and screwed around on her again is just such a shitty betrayal after him playing reformed family man and happy families for so long for his public image.
Oh FFS people are so gullible and Twitter is so reliable with the Gerrard rumours and all.
And it's not the Beckham story because THIS is:
http://www.holymoly.com/celebrity-news/david-beckham-prostitute-another-us-mag-alleges-2007-claridges-shenanigans49022
That's actually genuinely been reported in the states, I'm assuming someone's heard a big story was coming out and assumed it was the kid when in fact it's hookers.
EDIT: Whoops, should have read the whole thread first but I still think that story about him having a kid is a pile of shit.
Yes but it's a reputable massage place and not one that offers happy finishes which is why it was buried in side. He wasn't actually doing anything wrong them.
There's no need to "FFS" at anybody; the first line of the forum terms and conditions is "please treat other users with respect". You'd be wise to abide by it.
And if you had any sense of context you would realise that the thread was started before the prostitute story was released.
I don't blame them. If it is indeed 2007 then it's obviously old ground for the couple (they've either gotten over it or it just didn't happen) and it isn't really in the public interest as it occurred so long ago.
Sorry - I didnt explain myself very well there!!
I agree - when I saw it and realised that it was buried around page 7 I guessed there was nowt seedy in it and that they'd have whooshed it to front page if it was scandal.
Didn't they threaten legal action against Loos/NOTW, which never actually happened.
Surely "the ultimate betrayal" would be him shagging one of the other Spice Girls? Or her mum? Or Alex Ferguson?