Gonna have to explain how the process of two animals doing an act using only their bodies isn't natural.
Also, by this logic it would also be preferable to have a leg amputation carried out without any anaesthetic because that would be a more natural experience.
I'll keep this as clean as I possibly can, but this is my final word on the matter. A man's penis has a nice, comfortable, pleasurable, natural fit into a woman's vagina, because ultimately we are attracted to one another to reproduce. The purpose of the hole in your behind is to remove faeces from your body. Any other use for that orifice is very dirty and unnatural, and may well lead to damage and disease. I hope this is nice and clear for you.
I'll keep this as clean as I possibly can, but this is my final word on the matter. A man's penis has a nice, comfortable, pleasurable, natural fit into a woman's vagina, because ultimately we are attracted to one another to reproduce. The purpose of the hole in your behind is to remove faeces from your body. Any other use for that orifice is very dirty and unnatural, and may well lead to damage and disease. I hope this is nice and clear for you.
So it's unnatural cause you said so then? Ok, great.
And also, the logic of natural = better in all circumstances is still absurd.
Sex between man and a woman is best because it's natural. I don't believe for a single second that homosexual acts are natural. The purpose of the hole in your backside is for removing waste products from the body. It is not a sex organ.
Homosexual acts have been observed in many different species and are completely natural. Blowjobs are pretty good too, right? (assuming you're a man). And anal sex isn't restricted to homosexual men. I don't think you've thought this through, to be honest.
As a strictly heterosexual male the thought of sex with a man repulses me, but given that a large proportion of people can and do reach orgasm through anal sex (with a bit of a reacharound, obviously ;-)) I'm inclined to believe that I could too, were it not for the psychological obstacle. That I have no wish to overcome.
I'll keep this as clean as I possibly can, but this is my final word on the matter. A man's penis has a nice, comfortable, pleasurable, natural fit into a woman's vagina, because ultimately we are attracted to one another to reproduce. The purpose of the hole in your behind is to remove faeces from your body. Any other use for that orifice is very dirty and unnatural, and may well lead to damage and disease. I hope this is nice and clear for you.
A man's penis is also not supposed to go into a woman's mouth but I doubt you or any bloke would turn down head.
A man's penis is also not supposed to go into a woman's mouth but I doubt you or any bloke would turn down head.
Exactly. Vibrators are pretty popular too. And yet for some people simply eating, say, a Brussels sprout, a natural and nutritious foodstuff, is unpleasant. How odd! ^_^
I supppose only bisexual people are really qualified to answer this but I have had some experience of both and I am inclined to say that gay sex is better. Gay sex is so much more reciprocal and to my mind what sex should be about, whereas straight sex seems to be about the woman lying back, opening her legs, and the guy doing all the work, which is all a bit boring I think.
I'm bisexual (although I'm married in a heterosexual monogamous relationship now) and if you think gay sex is reciprocal then I'd have loved to have been with the guys you've been with. When it came to anal I preferred to be bottom, but that didn't mean I didn't like guys to get me off as well, and quite a few would shoot their load and fall asleep leaving me to sort myself out. I don't mind the odd occasion, but every time with some of the guys kind of kaboshed it for me. I'm not sure whether they've read the fact I prefer to be bottom as I'm passive or not I don't know, but I'd have appreciated them at least trying. I've had 3 serious relationships with guys and they only became serious because they made an effort to make sure I came at some point.
As for straight sex being boring? Yeah, OK, whatever. My wife does not do boring. We've been together 6 years and even a quicky (which is about an hour) encompasses quite a few positions, and she definitely puts just as much work in as I do.
Obviously hetero sex is far better. The vagina is designed to receive a penis and it is the best feeling in the world.
A hot wet soft vagina is a hundred times better than anal, and yes I have tried anal with female partner and it is not very good, far too tight and dry and not designed for sex at all.
Straight sex between man and woman is just so good, nothing else comes close.
Interestingly, even though the vagina is 'designed' that way, the moment anything enters it there's actually an immune response triggered. While there are several very good reasons for this, theoretically it shouldn't actually happen during sex. By the way guys, if you and your missus are trying for a baby, there's scientific evidence that shows blow jobs to completion, complete with swallowing, actually lessens the immune response and makes a woman more likely to conceive (although obviously not from a blow job) as the body stops treating sperm as an alien invader. Actually, if she's happy to "clean you up" that will work to, but not as much.
If anal was too dry then you haven't used enough lube, and if it's too tight then she definitely wasn't into it. Don't assume you can just ram it in and you'll both love it. It really doesn't work like that. You've got to spend your time getting her to relax and teasing her so she kind of 'opens up'. You then need to be gentle and let her take you in as opposed to just going for it. This is where the whole communication bit comes into play. I'd also recommend condoms from a hygiene point of view, and don't do it after a large meal or if she hasn't been recently otherwise it could be quite messy.
Why do gay men have to pretend that vaginas make them queasy? I don't understand. I am a straight woman and vaginas don't make me queasy.
Is it to make sure that everyone knows you are properly gay? So you all sit around in the pub talking about how vaginas are gross etc?
Really....
That's not quite the same though, because you've got one of the organs in question and you know what it does and how it works and why it does what it does and when.
If lesbians were to say that the thought of a penis makes them want to vomit, that'd be comparable.
But as you say it is rather tedious to hear men who will never have the slightest reason to have anything at all to do with such an orifice wibbling on about how they don't like the very idea of it.
I have no interest in football or cats or Eastenders, so I don't bother with any of them in real life. Nor do I go into threads about them to say how rubbish they are, because I am well aware that lots of people do like them and moreover, they do not impinge on my life in any way whatsoever.
Sex between man and a woman is best because it's natural. I don't believe for a single second that homosexual acts are natural. The purpose of the hole in your backside is for removing waste products from the body. It is not a sex organ.
Same gender sex happens with non-humans as well. It's not just something that only happens in the human race. Some animals that have no idea what homosexual means have sex with the same gender as them.
I'll keep this as clean as I possibly can, but this is my final word on the matter. A man's penis has a nice, comfortable, pleasurable, natural fit into a woman's vagina, because ultimately we are attracted to one another to reproduce. The purpose of the hole in your behind is to remove faeces from your body. Any other use for that orifice is very dirty and unnatural, and may well lead to damage and disease. I hope this is nice and clear for you.
I notice you didn't answer their point about some animals having gay sex.
Surely heterosexual sex always has the potential to be better than homosexual sex, simply because there're more options to choose from.
Which is better will depend on your orientation and your choice of partner.
I'll keep this as clean as I possibly can, but this is my final word on the matter. A man's penis has a nice, comfortable, pleasurable, natural fit into a woman's vagina, because ultimately we are attracted to one another to reproduce. The purpose of the hole in your behind is to remove faeces from your body. Any other use for that orifice is very dirty and unnatural, and may well lead to damage and disease. I hope this is nice and clear for you.
You sound rather lacking in imagination. And obsessed with one particular form of gay male sexual activity. No mention of what lesbians might get up to either!
Comments
Most people do, the silent majority, but those who don't, do tend to make a lot of noise about it!
But there is one particular orifice (with extendible protuberance) I could name that I suspect both camps do not use wholly for its intended purposes!
I'll keep this as clean as I possibly can, but this is my final word on the matter. A man's penis has a nice, comfortable, pleasurable, natural fit into a woman's vagina, because ultimately we are attracted to one another to reproduce. The purpose of the hole in your behind is to remove faeces from your body. Any other use for that orifice is very dirty and unnatural, and may well lead to damage and disease. I hope this is nice and clear for you.
So it's unnatural cause you said so then? Ok, great.
And also, the logic of natural = better in all circumstances is still absurd.
Homosexual acts have been observed in many different species and are completely natural. Blowjobs are pretty good too, right? (assuming you're a man). And anal sex isn't restricted to homosexual men. I don't think you've thought this through, to be honest.
As a strictly heterosexual male the thought of sex with a man repulses me, but given that a large proportion of people can and do reach orgasm through anal sex (with a bit of a reacharound, obviously ;-)) I'm inclined to believe that I could too, were it not for the psychological obstacle. That I have no wish to overcome.
A man's penis is also not supposed to go into a woman's mouth but I doubt you or any bloke would turn down head.
Exactly. Vibrators are pretty popular too. And yet for some people simply eating, say, a Brussels sprout, a natural and nutritious foodstuff, is unpleasant. How odd! ^_^
As for straight sex being boring? Yeah, OK, whatever. My wife does not do boring. We've been together 6 years and even a quicky (which is about an hour) encompasses quite a few positions, and she definitely puts just as much work in as I do. Interestingly, even though the vagina is 'designed' that way, the moment anything enters it there's actually an immune response triggered. While there are several very good reasons for this, theoretically it shouldn't actually happen during sex. By the way guys, if you and your missus are trying for a baby, there's scientific evidence that shows blow jobs to completion, complete with swallowing, actually lessens the immune response and makes a woman more likely to conceive (although obviously not from a blow job) as the body stops treating sperm as an alien invader. Actually, if she's happy to "clean you up" that will work to, but not as much.
If anal was too dry then you haven't used enough lube, and if it's too tight then she definitely wasn't into it. Don't assume you can just ram it in and you'll both love it. It really doesn't work like that. You've got to spend your time getting her to relax and teasing her so she kind of 'opens up'. You then need to be gentle and let her take you in as opposed to just going for it. This is where the whole communication bit comes into play. I'd also recommend condoms from a hygiene point of view, and don't do it after a large meal or if she hasn't been recently otherwise it could be quite messy.
Sex should be pleasurable for both participants, is that right ?
Not if her fanny is like a bucket......
Why do gay men have to pretend that vaginas make them queasy? I don't understand. I am a straight woman and vaginas don't make me queasy.
Is it to make sure that everyone knows you are properly gay? So you all sit around in the pub talking about how vaginas are gross etc?
Really....
You don't kiss, then ?
That's not quite the same though, because you've got one of the organs in question and you know what it does and how it works and why it does what it does and when.
If lesbians were to say that the thought of a penis makes them want to vomit, that'd be comparable.
But as you say it is rather tedious to hear men who will never have the slightest reason to have anything at all to do with such an orifice wibbling on about how they don't like the very idea of it.
I have no interest in football or cats or Eastenders, so I don't bother with any of them in real life. Nor do I go into threads about them to say how rubbish they are, because I am well aware that lots of people do like them and moreover, they do not impinge on my life in any way whatsoever.
Same gender sex happens with non-humans as well. It's not just something that only happens in the human race. Some animals that have no idea what homosexual means have sex with the same gender as them.
I notice you didn't answer their point about some animals having gay sex.
Being Wales I'm sure, even if those parts aren't always human.
Precisely. I don't think they like LGBT people at all. Either that, or they're just on a wind-up.
Which is better will depend on your orientation and your choice of partner.
You sound rather lacking in imagination. And obsessed with one particular form of gay male sexual activity. No mention of what lesbians might get up to either!
From that statement, you've either never had sex with a woman, or were really very bad at it.
You were doing it wrong.