Hope we never vote for a person like Helen ever ever again and hope we don't fall for the producers agenda too. >:(
Last year we were duped into their petty little games, this year we need to be stronger.
Did you vote for Helen
I assumed people that voted for her wanted her to win and weren't duped at all. I mean her character and personality was hardly hidden so I'd be surprised if people were only voting for her because they fell for an agenda. I think they meant their vote.
I voted for Helen to win (voted for Christopher too).
I thought she was the best of the bunch at the time - there wasn't much to choose from. I didn't like Ashleigh. Helen could be aggressive and argumentative but she was honest - I don't like sneaky.
I've not been impressed since she's been out - I don't approve of anyone throwing drinks over someone - it's not nice but ................unfortunately it's something that happens in pubs and clubs up and down the country. As for Danielle - I think she was/is a devious, manipulative character - I suppose Helen felt the same.
I thought she was the best of the bunch at the time - there wasn't much to choose from. I didn't like Ashleigh. Helen could be aggressive and argumentative but she was honest - I don't like sneaky.
Yeah, because Helen was such a loveable person inside the BB house. ;-)
Why on earth would you (or anyone) think she was the best of "a bad bunch"? theres a huge difference between being honest and being nasty and abusive...and she ALWAYS crossed that line.
The two Chris's might not have been to your taste but they were and always will be far better than the Helen's of this world.
Yeah, because Helen was such a loveable person inside the BB house. ;-)
Why on earth would you (or anyone) think she was the best of "a bad bunch"? theres a huge difference between being honest and being nasty and abusive...and she ALWAYS crossed that line.
The two Chris's might not have been to your taste but they were and always will be far better than the Helen's of this world.
Because I did .......along with a lot of others.
She was aggressive - she could be nasty at times - I chose her over the others .
I'm certainly not going down the route of arguing it all over again - I couldn't understand for the life of me why anyone voted JD or Gary Busey - I've given up arguing over it now though.
I have only been present on one occasion when someone threw a drink over someone else and that was many years ago. The bloke who did the throwing was a dangerous thug.
I assumed people that voted for her wanted her to win and weren't duped at all. I mean her character and personality was hardly hidden so I'd be surprised if people were only voting for her because they fell for an agenda. I think they meant their vote.
Helens cousin works for endemol so the whole thing was a blatant fix. >:( >:( >:(
I thought the Public would have chosen Christopher as the winner. He was much nicer and more deserving than either of them, in my opinion.
He was lovely .........he didn't seem to get the proper hard core public support though. I think he was better as a lone wolf - his teaming up with Mark did him no favours IMO.
I thought the Public would have chosen Christopher as the winner. He was much nicer and more deserving than either of them, in my opinion.
Maybe because Ashley made it known that she didn't like Helen and wasn't taking any of her nonsense, whereas Christopher sort of sat on the fence most of the time.
He was lovely .........he didn't seem to get the proper hard core public support though. I think he was better as a lone wolf - his teaming up with Mark did him no favours IMO.
Are you talking about male Ash in last years BB...."lovely"?
She was aggressive - she could be nasty at times - I chose her over the others .
I'm certainly not going down the route of arguing it all over again - I couldn't understand for the life of me why anyone voted JD or Gary Busey - I've given up arguing over it now though.
Hey listen, I don't want to go over old ground and argue this all over again either, but if you are going to make comments like that you must expect a little comeback. ;-)
BTW, please DO NOT put Gary Busey or Davidson in the same bracket as Helen please, they weren't a vile thuggish bullies.
Hey listen, I don't want to go over old ground and argue this all over again either, but if you are going to make comments like that you must expect a little comeback. ;-)
BTW, please DO NOT put Gary Busey or Davidson in the same bracket as Helen please, they weren't a vile thuggish bullies.
I do accept comeback but as I said - I'm not going to defend it all over again. It was exhausted (and more) at the time and I will happily put JD in the mix with the likes of Helen. I don't know enough of Gary Busey.
I agree. Danielle is one of my all-time least favourite HMs. I know some people found her innocuous or inoffensive, but she showed some of my least favourite traits in humans: hypocritical, deceitful, delusional, manipulative and weak.
All of those traits (except possibly 'weak') apply even more to Helen.
The only reason anyone ever liked Danielle was because she was anti-Helen. She was always horrible herself, as bad or worse than Helen.
None of that is true. No one in bb15 was always horrible, or as bad or worse than Helen; and there were times when at least some people liked Danielle for other reasons than her being anti-Helen. Being anti-Helen was rightly a big point in any HM's favour though.
I assumed people that voted for her wanted her to win and weren't duped at all. I mean her character and personality was hardly hidden so I'd be surprised if people were only voting for her because they fell for an agenda. I think they meant their vote.
Meaning their vote is not inconsistent with being duped or with falling for an agenda.
I thought she was the best of the bunch at the time - there wasn't much to choose from. I didn't like Ashleigh. Helen could be aggressive and argumentative but she was honest - I don't like sneaky.
Yeah, because Helen was such a loveable person inside the BB house. ;-)
Why on earth would you (or anyone) think she was the best of "a bad bunch"? theres a huge difference between being honest and being nasty and abusive...and she ALWAYS crossed that line.
The two Chris's might not have been to your taste but they were and always will be far better than the Helen's of this world.
To reduce cognitive dissonance. For instance, if someone liked Jale or Kim, they might deal with Jale or Kim becoming part of Helen's group and friendly with her by seeing Helen as not so bad, or by seeing other (anti-Helen) HMs as being as bad or worse.
Comments
Did you vote for Helen
I assumed people that voted for her wanted her to win and weren't duped at all. I mean her character and personality was hardly hidden so I'd be surprised if people were only voting for her because they fell for an agenda. I think they meant their vote.
I thought she was the best of the bunch at the time - there wasn't much to choose from. I didn't like Ashleigh. Helen could be aggressive and argumentative but she was honest - I don't like sneaky.
I've not been impressed since she's been out - I don't approve of anyone throwing drinks over someone - it's not nice but ................unfortunately it's something that happens in pubs and clubs up and down the country. As for Danielle - I think she was/is a devious, manipulative character - I suppose Helen felt the same.
Yeah, because Helen was such a loveable person inside the BB house. ;-)
Why on earth would you (or anyone) think she was the best of "a bad bunch"? theres a huge difference between being honest and being nasty and abusive...and she ALWAYS crossed that line.
The two Chris's might not have been to your taste but they were and always will be far better than the Helen's of this world.
Because I did .......along with a lot of others.
She was aggressive - she could be nasty at times - I chose her over the others .
I'm certainly not going down the route of arguing it all over again - I couldn't understand for the life of me why anyone voted JD or Gary Busey - I've given up arguing over it now though.
That is completely ridiculous.
She threw a drink over someone.
I have only been present on one occasion when someone threw a drink over someone else and that was many years ago. The bloke who did the throwing was a dangerous thug.
Helens cousin works for endemol so the whole thing was a blatant fix. >:( >:( >:(
Was that Conor's cousin too
No Connors cousins, step - brothers, niece was best friends with the daughter of the woman who cleaned the producers office.:o
I thought the Public would have chosen Christopher as the winner. He was much nicer and more deserving than either of them, in my opinion.
He was lovely .........he didn't seem to get the proper hard core public support though. I think he was better as a lone wolf - his teaming up with Mark did him no favours IMO.
Maybe because Ashley made it known that she didn't like Helen and wasn't taking any of her nonsense, whereas Christopher sort of sat on the fence most of the time.
It was ridiculous this time yes, but if we are honest she is the type that'll end up getting arrested for something serious...sooner or later.
Are you talking about male Ash in last years BB...."lovely"?
That guy who has no respect for women Ashley?
Has this forum gone mad while I've been away.
Hey listen, I don't want to go over old ground and argue this all over again either, but if you are going to make comments like that you must expect a little comeback. ;-)
BTW, please DO NOT put Gary Busey or Davidson in the same bracket as Helen please, they weren't a vile thuggish bullies.
I do accept comeback but as I said - I'm not going to defend it all over again. It was exhausted (and more) at the time and I will happily put JD in the mix with the likes of Helen. I don't know enough of Gary Busey.
All of those traits (except possibly 'weak') apply even more to Helen.
None of that is true. No one in bb15 was always horrible, or as bad or worse than Helen; and there were times when at least some people liked Danielle for other reasons than her being anti-Helen. Being anti-Helen was rightly a big point in any HM's favour though.
Meaning their vote is not inconsistent with being duped or with falling for an agenda.
Helen was sneaky and dishonest.
To reduce cognitive dissonance. For instance, if someone liked Jale or Kim, they might deal with Jale or Kim becoming part of Helen's group and friendly with her by seeing Helen as not so bad, or by seeing other (anti-Helen) HMs as being as bad or worse.